Reproductive politics and Latinxs’ politics demonstrate a preoccupation with representations and discourses across time and space. Intersectional feminists theorize how controlling images function as mechanisms of social control by distorting holistic perceptions of marginalized people. While social movement research documents the importance of culture in collective action, little research applies a controlling images interpretive framework to social movement contexts. An important case for examining Latina/x representations is the ideological terrain created by pro-abortion Latina/x feminist advocates. Utilizing a three-year ethnography with California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (CLRJ), written materials produced by the organization, and in-depth interviews with staff, I argue that CLRJ highlights the limitations of existing research, uses feminist approaches to dialogue, and creates structural analyses of inequalities to challenge la santa (the saint), a controlling image centering cisgender mestiza and white Latinas used to assume that all Latinas make poor advocates for reproductive autonomy.
AlvirezDavidBeanFrank D.. 1976. “The Mexican-American Family.” Pp. 271–92 in Ethnic Families in America, edited by MindelCharles H.HabensteinRobert W.. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
2.
AmentaEdwinPollettaFrancesca. 2019. “The Cultural Impacts of Social Movements.”Annual Review of Sociology45:279–99.
3.
Baca ZinnMaxine. 1982/1983. “Familism among Chicanos: A Theoretical Review.”Humboldt Journal of Social Relations10(1):224–38.
4.
Beauboeuf-LafontantTamara. 2009. Behind the Mask of the Strong Black Woman: Voice and the Embodiment of a Costly Performance. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
5.
BenzTerressa A.2020. “Black Femininity and Stand Your Ground: Controlling Images and the Elusive Defense of Self-defense.”Critical Sociology46(7–8):1093–107.
6.
BettieJulie. 2003. Women without Class: Girls, Race, and Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
BullaroGrace Russo. 2005. “Salvatore Morelli, John Stuart Hall and the Victorian ‘Angel of the Hearth’ Feminine Role Paradigm.”Forum Italicum: A Journal of Italian Studies39(1):157–66.
8.
CastañedaAntonia. 1990. “The Political Economy of Nineteenth Century Stereotypes of Californianas.” Pp. 213–236 in Between Borders: Essays on Mexicana/Chicana History, edited by Del CastilloA. R.. Encino, CA: Floricanto Press.
9.
ChavezLeo R.2008. The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Clonan-RoyKatherine. 2019. “Latina Girls’ Sexual Education in the (New) Latinx Diaspora.”Girlhood Studies12(2):65–81.
11.
CrenshawKimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.”Stanford Law Review43(6):1241–99.
12.
Cruz-JanzenMartha I.2017. “Latinegras: Desired Women—Undesirable Mothers, Daughters, Sisters, and Wives.” Pp. 282–95 in The Afro-Latin@ Reader: History and Culture in the United States, edited by Jiménez RománM.FloresJ.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
DávilaArlene. 2012. Latinos Inc.: The Marketing and Making of a People. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
DeckardNatalie DeliaBrowneIreneRodriguezCassaundraMartinez-ColaMariselaLealSofia Gonzalez. 2020. “Controlling Images of Immigrants in the Mainstream and Black Press: The Discursive Power of the ‘Illegal Latino.’”Latino Studies18:581–602.
15.
DennerJillGuzmanBianca L., eds. 2006. Latina Girls: Voices of Adolescent Strength in the United States. New York: New York University Press.
16.
DowDawn. 2016. “The Deadly Challenges of Raising African American Boys: Navigating the Controlling Image of the ‘Thug.’”Gender & Society30(2):161–88.
17.
FergusonAnn Arnett. 2000. Bad Boys: Public Schools in the Making of Black Masculinity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
18.
FineGary A.2002. “The Storied Group: Social Movements as ‘Bundles of Narratives.’” Pp. 229–45 in Stories of Change: Narratives and Social Movements, edited by DavisJ. E.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
FregosoRosa Linda. 2003. MeXicana Encounters: The Making of Social Identities on the Borderlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20.
GarcíaLorena. 2009. “Now Why Do You Want to Know about That? Heteronormativity, Sexism, and Racism in the Sexual (Mis)education of Latina Youth.”Gender & Society23(4):520–41.
21.
Gaspar de AlbaAlicia. 2014. (Un)Framing the “Bad Woman”: Sor Juana, Malinche, Coyolxauhqui, and Other Rebels with a Cause. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
22.
GilRosa MariaVásquezCarmen Inoa. 1996. The Maria Paradox: How Latinas Can Merge Old World Traditions with New World Self-esteem. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
23.
GurusamiSusila. 2019. “Motherwork under the State: The Maternal Labor of Formerly Incarcerated Black Women.”Social Problems66:128–43.
24.
GutiérrezElena. 2008. Fertile Matters: The Politics of Mexican Origin Women’s Reproduction. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
25.
HallStuart. 1989. “Ethnicity: Identity and Difference.”Radical America23(4):9–20.
26.
Hill CollinsPatricia. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.”Social Problems33(6):14–32.
27.
Hill CollinsPatricia. [1990]2000. Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge Press.
28.
KellyMaura. 2010. “Regulating the Reproduction and Mothering of Poor Women: The Controlling Image of the Welfare Mother in Television News Coverage of Welfare Reform.”Journal of Poverty14:76–96.
29.
KennellyIvy. 1999. “‘That Single-mother Element’: How White Employers Typify Black Women.”Gender & Society13(2):168–92.
30.
LaraIrene. 2005. “Bruja Positionalities: Toward a Chicana/Latina Spiritual Activism.”Chicana/Latina Studies4(2):10–45.
31.
Le EspirituYen. 1997. Asian American Women and Men: Labor, Laws, and Love. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LunaZakiya. 2016. “Truly a Women of Color Organization: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in Pursuit of Intersectionality.”Gender & Society30(5):769–90.
34.
McMillan CottomTressie. 2019. Thick and Other Essays. New York: The New Press.
35.
MeghjiAli. 2018. “Activating Controlling Images in the Racialized Interaction Order: Black Middle-class Interactions and the Creativity of Racist Action.”Symbolic Interaction42(2):229–49.
36.
Molina-GuzmánIsabel. 2010. Dangerous Curves: Latina Bodies in the Media. New York: New York University Press.
37.
MoraG. Cristina. 2014. Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a New American. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
NorrisAdele N.BillingsJoseph. 2017. “Colorblind Ideology, Mass Incarceration, and Controlling Racial Images: An Intersectional Analysis of Presidential Rhetoric from 1969-1996.” Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice15(1):78–98.
39.
OchoaGilda. 2013. Academic Profiling: Latinos, Asian Americans, and the Achievement Gap. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
PadillaYajaira M.2009. “Domesticating Rosario: Conflicting Representations of the Latina Maid in U.S. Media.”Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies13:41–59.
41.
PollettaFrancesca. 1998. “Contending Stories: Narratives in Social Movements.”Qualitative Sociology21(4):419–46.
42.
PollettaFrancesca. 2006. It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
RamirezOscarArceCarlos H.. 1981. “The Contemporary Chicano Family: An Empirically Based Review.” Pp. 3–28 in Explorations in Chicano Psychology, edited by Baron, JrAugustine. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44.
ReyesDaisy Verduzco. 2016. “Conundrums of Desire: Sexual Discourses of Mexican-origin Mothers.”Sexuality & Culture20:1020–41.
45.
RobertsDorothy. 1997. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Vintage Books.
SaidEdward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
48.
SchmitzRachel M.RobinsonBrandon AndrewTablerJennifer. 2020. “Navigating Risk Discourses: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Care Among LBQ+ Latina Young Adults.”Sexuality Research and Social Policy17:61–74.
49.
Sena-RiveraJaime. 1979. “Extended Kinship in the United States: Competing Models and the Case of La Familia Chicana.”Journal of Marriage and the Family41:121–29.
50.
SimmsRupe. 2001. “Controlling Images and the Gender Construction of Enslaved Black Women.”Gender & Society15(6):879–97.
51.
SolingerRickie. 2005. Pregnancy and Power: A Short History of Reproductive Politics in America. New York: New York University Press.
52.
Stanger-HallKathrin F.HallDavid W.. 2011. “Abstinence-only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S.”PLoS ONE6(10):e24658.
53.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.”Sociological Theory30(3):167–86.
54.
UchidaAki. 1998. “The Orientalization of Asian Women in America.”Women’s Studies International Forum21(2):161–74.
55.
Vasquez-TokosJessicaNorton-SmithKathryn. 2017. “Talking Back to Controlling Images: Latinos’ Changes Responses to Racism over the Life Course.”Ethnic and Racial Studies40(6):912–30.
56.
WingfieldAdia Harvey. 2009. “Racializing the Glass Escalator: Reconsidering Men’s Experiences with Women’s Work.”Gender & Society23(1):5–26.
