Deciding whether Americans have become decreasingly involved in group life entails a methodological issue: Does the standard question about the associations to which respondents belong, asked for decades by the General Social Survey (GSS) and many others, miss newer and more diverse forms of group involvement? Following on Paxton and Rap, we mine a recent panel survey, UCNets, that provides several different means for allowing respondents to describe their group involvement. We observe more and much more varied kinds of group involvement than those elicited by the last GSS administration of the standard question in 2004. (Analyses in the Supplement of a few additional surveys confirm this diversity.) These results lead to suggestions for how to better measure involvement in groups, in particular being more sensitive to many axes of difference in the general population. The results have implications for the larger debate as well.
AngShannon. 2019. “Life Course Social Connectedness: Age-cohort Trends in Social Participation.” Advances in Life Course Research39:13–22.
2.
BaerDouglasCurtisJamesGrabbEdward. 2001. “Has Voluntary Association Activity Declined? Cross-national Analyses for Fifteen Countries.” Canadian Review of Sociology38(3):249–74.
3.
BumgartnerFrank R.WalkerJack T.1988. “Survey Research and Membership in Voluntary Associations.” American Journal of Political Science32(4):908–28.
4.
ChambréSusan M. 2020. “Has Volunteering Changed in the United States? Trends, Styles, and Motivations in Historical Perspective.” Social Service Review94(2):373–421.
5.
ChildStephanie T.LawtonLeora E.2020. “Personal Networks and Associations with Psychological Distress among Young and Older Adults.” Social Science Medicine246:112714.
6.
CohenJean L.1999. “Does Voluntary Association Make Democracy Work?” Pp. 263–92 in Diversity and Its Discontents: Cultural Conflict and Common Ground in Contemporary American Society, edited by SmelserNeil J.AlexanderJefferey C.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
CostaDoraKahnMatthew E.2003. “Understanding the American Decline in Social Capital, 1952-1998.” Kyklos56:17–46.
8.
FineGary AlanHarringtonBrooke. 2004. “Tiny Publics: Small Groups and Civil Society.” Sociological Theory22(3):341–56.
9.
FischerClaude S.2005. “Bowling Alone: What’s the Score?” Social Networks27:155–67.
10.
FischerClaude S.2011. Still Connected: Family and Friends since 1970. New York: Russell Sage.
11.
FischerClaude S.2020. UC Berkeley Social Networks Study (UCNets), San Francisco Bay Area, 2015-2018 (ICPSR 36975). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36975.v2.
12.
FischerClaude S.BayhamLindsay. 2019. “Mode and Interviewer Effects in Egocentric Network Research.” Field Methods31(3):195–213.
13.
LaddEverett C.1999. The Ladd Report. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
MarsdenPeter V.SrivastavaSameer B.2012. “Trends in Informal Social Participation, 1974-2008.” Pp. 240–65 in Social Trends in American Life: Findings from the General Social Survey Since1972, edited by MarsdenPeter V.Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
15.
National Opinion Research Center. 1994. “GSS: America’s National Survey.” Version 2. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
16.
OfferShiraFischerClaude S.2018. “Difficult People: Who is Perceived to be Demanding in Personal Networks and Why Are They There?” American Sociological Review83(1):111–42.
17.
PainterMatthew A.IIPaxtonPamela. 2014. “Checkbooks in the Heartland: Change over Time in Voluntary Association Membership.” Sociological Forum29(2):408–28.
18.
PaxtonPamela. 1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology105:88–127.
19.
PaxtonPamelaRapRobyn. 2016. “Does the Standard Voluntary Association Question Capture Informal Associations?” Social Science Research60:212–221.
PutnamRobert D.1995a. “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital.” Journal of Democracy6(1):65–78.
23.
PutnamRobert D.1995b. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science & Politics28:664–83.
24.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
25.
RainieLeeWellmanBarry. 2014. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
RapRobynPaxtonPamela. 2021. “How Accurate Are Self-reports of Voluntary Association Memberships?” Sociological Methods & Research50:866–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799384
27.
RotoloThomas. 1999. “Trends in Voluntary Association Participation.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28:199–212.
SampsonRobert J.McAdamDougMacIndoeHeatherWeffer-ElizondoSimon. 2005. “Civil Society Reconsidered: The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology111(3):673–714.
30.
SkocpolTheda. 1997. “The Tocqueville Problem: Civic Engagement in American Democracy.” Social Science History21:455–79.
31.
SkocpolTheda. 2004. “Voice and Inequality: The Transformation of American Civic Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics2(1):3–20.
32.
SmallMario L.GoseLeah E.2020. “How Do Low-Income People Form Survival Networks? Routine Organizations as Brokers.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science689(1):89–109.
33.
SmithDavid Horton. 1994. “Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly23(3):243–63.
34.
StolleDietlandHoogheMarc. 2004. “Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies.” British Journal of Political Science35:149–67.
35.
Theiss-MorseElizabethHibbingJohn R.2005. “Citizenship and Civic Engagement.” Annual Review of Political Science8:227–49.
36.
ThomsonIrene Taviss. 2005. “The Theory That Won’t Die: From Mass Society to the Decline of Social Capital.” Sociological Forum20(3):421–48.
37.
TorresStacy. 2019. “On Elastic Ties: Distance and Intimacy in Social Relationships.” Sociological Science. doi:10.15195/v6.a10.
38.
VacaRaffaele. 2020. “Structure in Personal Networks: Constructing and Comparing Typologies.” Network Science8(2):142–67.
39.
VerbaSidneyNieNorman H.1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
40.
VerbaSidneyNieNorman H.2000. “Political Participation In America, 1967” [Computer file, Conducted by University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center and University of California at Berkeley, Survey Research Center. ICPSR Ed]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Producer and Distributor] 2000. doi:10.3886/ICPSR07015.v1.
41.
VerderyAshtonCampbellColin. 2019. “Social Support in America: Stratification and Trends in Access over Two Decades.” Social Forces98(2):725–52.
42.
WuthnowRobert. 1998. Loose Connections: Joining Together in America’s Fragmented Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
