We consider the association between state political ideology and population mobility during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. We use first-party geo-behavioral data to estimate the average distance traveled by approximately 15,000,000 devices over 10 weeks (February 24, 2020 to April 27, 2020). Regression models with state clustered robust standard errors show lower shelter-in-place rates and higher mobility scores in states with larger percentages of voters who supported Trump in the 2016 presidential election. We also find that shelter-in-place rates increased and mobility scores declined at slower rates in states with greater Trump support. Shelter-in-place rates and average mobility scores were comparable in states governed by Republicans and Democrats. There was some evidence that shelter-in-place rates increased and average mobility scores declined at slower rates in states governed by Republicans. Overall, states with more Trump voters are more resistant to public health recommendations and state stay-at-home orders during the coronavirus pandemic.
BenegalSalilScruggsLyle. 2018. “Correcting Misinformation about Climate Change: The Impact of Partisanship in an Experimental Setting.” Climatic Change14:861–80.
5.
BerinskyAdam. 2015. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation.” British Journal of Political Science47:241–62.
Coronavirus Resource Center. 2020. “COVID-19 Dashboard.” Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved November 26, 2020 (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html).
GrahamAmandaCullenFrankPickettJustinJonsonCherylHanerMuratSloanMelissa. 2020. “Faith in Trump, Moral Foundations, and Social Distancing Defiance during the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Socius6:1–23.
18.
GrammichCliffordHadawayKirkHousealRichardJonesDaleKrindatchAlexeiStanleyRichieTaylorRichard. 2018. “U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations and Membership Study, 2010 (State File).” Retrieved November 26, 2020 (http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/RCMSST10.asp).
HillTerrenceGonzalezKelseyBurdetteAmy. 2020. “The Blood of Christ Compels Them: State Religiosity and State Population Mobility during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic.” Journal of Religion and Health59:2229–42.
21.
JorgensonAndrew. 2007. “Foreign Direct Investment and Pesticide use Intensity in Less-developed Countries: A Quantitative Investigation.” Society and Natural Resources20:73–83.
MottaMatt. 2018a. “The Dynamics and Political Implications of Anti-intellectualism in the United States.” American Politics Research46:465–98.
27.
MottaMatt. 2018b. “The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists.” Political Science & Politics51:782–88.
28.
MottaMattSteculaDominikFarhartChristina. 2020. “How Right-leaning Media Coverage of COVID-19 Facilitated the Spread of Misinformation in the Early Stages of the Pandemic in the US.” Canadian Journal of Political Science53:335–42.
29.
NisbetErikCooperKathrynGarrettR. Kelly. 2015. “The Partisan Brain: How Dissonant Science Messages Lead Conservatives and Liberals to (Dis)Trust Science.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science658:36–66.
30.
OreskesNaomiConwayErik. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscure the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
31.
PerrySamuelWhiteheadAndrewGrubbsJoshua. 2020. “Culture Wars and COVID-19 Conduct: Christian Nationalism, Religiosity, and Americans’ Behavior during the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion59:405–16.
RobitzschAlexanderGrundSimon. 2020. “miceadds: Some Additional Multiple Imputation Functions, Especially for ‘Mice.’” R Package Version 3.8-9. Retrieved November 26, 2020 (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=miceadds).
SwireBrionyBerinskyAdamLewandowskyStephanEckerUllrich. 2017. “Processing Political Misinformation: Comprehending the Trump Phenomenon.” Royal Society Open Science4:160802.
