We examine the global rise of environmental protest events reported in major news outlets from 1970 to 2010, based on a new cross-national dataset. The paper addresses conventional arguments regarding resources and political opportunities, but focuses principally on the international dynamics that affect local protest and its visibility. World society theory as well as scholarship on transnational movements and advocacy networks suggests that international organizations and institutions play an important role in bringing resources, opportunities, and global media attention to local movements. We argue that international forces will be especially important in nondemocratic countries. Cross-national quantitative analyses suggest that nations with strong organizational ties to the international community have more protests that get covered in international media, and that the effects of international forces are stronger in less democratic societies.
AlimiE. Y.2009. “Mobilizing under the Gun: Theorizing Political Opportunity Structure in a Highly Repressive Setting.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly14(2):219–37.
2.
AllisonP. D.2012. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3.
AlmeidaP. D.2003. “Opportunity Organizations and Threat-induced Contention: Protest Waves in Authoritarian Settings.” American Journal of Sociology109(2):345–400.
4.
AlmeidaP. D.2018. “The Role of Threat in Collective Action.” Pp. 43–62 in Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J.Oxford, England: Blackwell.
AmentaE.2006. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
AndrewsK. T.CarenN.2010. “Making the News: Movement Organizations, Media Attention, and the Public Agenda.” American Sociological Review75(6):841–66.
8.
BaverS. L.LynchB. D.2006. Beyond Sun and Sand: Caribbean Environmentalisms. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9.
BeckfieldJ.2003. “Inequality in the World Polity: The Structure of International Organization.”American Sociological Review68(3):401–424.
10.
BergerP. L.LuckmanT.1966. The Social Construction of Reality. London, England: Penguin Books.
11.
BoliJ.ThomasG. M.1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BoudreauV.1996. “Northern Theory, Southern Protest: Opportunity Structure Analysis in Cross-national Perspective.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly1(2):175–89.
13.
BrentonT.1994. The Greening of Machiavelli: The Evolution of International Environmental Politics. London, England: Royal Institute of International Affairs, Energy and Environmental Programme.
14.
BrownM. C.HalabyC. N.1984. “Bosses, Reform, and the Socioeconomic Bases of Urban Expenditure, 1890–1940.” Pp. 69–89 in The Politics of Urban Fiscal Policy, edited by McDonaldT. S.WardS. K.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
CarenN.GabyS.HerroldC. E.2017. “Economic Breakdown and Collective Action.” Social Problems64(1):133–55.
16.
ChristenC.HerculanoS.HochstetlerK.PrellR.PriceM.RobertsJ. T.1998. “Latin American Environmentalism: Comparative Views.” Studies in Comparative International Development33(2):58–87.
17.
ColeW. M.2006. “When All Else Fails: International Adjudication of Human Rights Abuse Claims, 1976–1999.” Social Forces84(4):1909–35.
18.
de la Luz InclanM.2008. “From the !Ya Basta! to the Caracoles: Zapatista Mobilization under Transitional Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology113(5):1316–50.
19.
della PortaD.TarrowS.2005. “Transnational Processes and Social Activism: An Introduction.” Pp. 1–21 in Transnational Protest and Global Activism, edited by della PortaD.TarrowS.Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
DunlapR. E.YorkR.2008. “The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys.” Sociological Quarterly49(3):529–63.
21.
EarlJ.MartinA.McCarthyJ. D.SouleS. A.2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology30:65–80.
22.
EdwardsB.McCarthyJ. D.2007. “Resources and Social Movement Mobilization.” Pp. 116–52 in Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
FaginA.2000. “Environmental Protest in the Czech Republic: Three Stages of Post-communist Development.” Czech Sociological Review8(2):139–56.
24.
FeenstraR. C.InklaarR.TimmerM. P.2015. “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table.”American Economic Review105(10):3150–82.
25.
FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A.GerhardsJ.RuchtD.2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
FrankD. J.HironakaA.SchoferE.2000. “The Nation-state and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review65:96–116.
27.
FrankD. J.RobinsonK. J.OlesenJ.2011. “The Global Expansion of Environmental Education in Universities.”Comparative Education Review55(November): 546-73.
28.
Gallo-CruzS. R.2012. Have Repertoire, Will Travel: INGOs and the Globalization of Nonviolence. Emory University, Laney Graduate School. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository.
29.
GamsonJ.ModiglianiA.1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology95(1):1–37.
30.
GitlinT.1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
GiugniM.2002. Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective. Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
GreenA.2007. Introduction to Health Planning for Developing Health Systems. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33.
GusfieldJ. R.1976. “The Literary Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver Research.” American Sociological Review41(1):16–34.
34.
Hafner-BurtonE. M.2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology110(5):1373–1411.
35.
HausmanJ.HallB. H.GrilichesZ.1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship.” Econometrica52(4):909–38.
36.
HironakaA.2014. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
InglehartR.1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
JohnsonE. W.FrickelS.2011. “Ecological Threat and the Founding of U.S. National Environmental Movement Organizations, 1962–1998.” Social Problems58(3):305–29.
39.
JohnsonE. W.McCarthyJ. D.2005. “The Sequencing of Transnational and National Social Movement Mobilization: The Organizational Mobilization of the Global and U.S. Environmental Movements.” Pp. 71–93 in Transnational Protest and Global Activism, edited by della PortaD.TarrowS.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
JosselinD.2007. “From Transnational Protest to Domestic Political Opportunities: Insights from the Debt Cancellation Campaign.” Social Movement Studies6(1):21–38.
41.
KeckM.SikkinkK.1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
KriesiH.KoopmansR.DuyvendakJ. W.GiugniM.1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Social Movements, Protest, and Contention. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
LonghoferW.SchoferE.2010. “National and Global Origins of Environmental Association.” American Sociological Review75(4):505–33.
45.
LonghoferW.SchoferE.MiricN.FrankD. J.2016. “NGOs, INGOs, and Environmental Policy Reform, 1970–2010.” Social Forces94(4):1743–68.
46.
MarshallM. G.GurrT. R.JaggersK.2014. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2012.” Dataset Users’ Manual. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
47.
McAdamD.1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
McAdamD.BoudetH. S.2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000–2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
McCarthyJ. D.McPhailC.SmithJ.1996. “Images of Protest: Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington, D.C. Demonstrations.” American Sociological Review61:478–99.
50.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology82(6):1212–41.
51.
MeyerD. S.1990. A Winter of Discontent: The Nuclear Freeze and American Politics. New York: Praeger.
52.
MeyerD. S.2003. “Political Opportunity and Nested Institutions.” Social Movement Studies2(1):17–35.
53.
MeyerD. S.2012. “National Human Rights Institutions, Opportunities, and Activism.” Pp. 324–34 in Human Rights, State Compliance, and Social Change, edited by GoodmanR.PegramT.New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
MeyerD. S.LascheverE.2015. “Social Movements and the Institutionalization of Dissent in America.” Pp. 563–93 in The Oxford Handbook of American Political Development, edited by LiebermanR.MettlerS.ValelleyR.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
55.
MeyerD. S.LupoL.2010. “Assessing the Politics of Protest: Political Science and the Study of Social Movements.” Pp. 111–56 in Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines, edited by KlandermansB.RoggebandC.New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
56.
MeyerD. S.RohlingerD. A.2012. “Big Books and Social Movements: A Myth of Ideas and Social Change.” Social Problems59(1):136–53.
57.
MeyerD. S.TarrowS.1998. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
58.
MeyerJ. W.BoliJ.ThomasG. M.RamirezF. O.1997. “World Society and the Nation-state.” American Journal of Sociology103(1):144–81.
59.
MeyerJ. W.JeppersonR. L.2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory18(1):100–20.
60.
MurdieA.BhasinT.2011. “Aiding and Abetting: Human Rights INGOs and Domestic Protest. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(2): 163–191.
61.
NwankwoA. A.1982. “After Oil What Next? Oil and Multi-nationals in Nigeria.” Enugu, Nigeria: Fourth Dimension Publisher.
62.
OlzakS.2006. The Global Dynamics of Racial and Ethnic Mobilization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
O’NeillK.2012. “The Comparative Study of Environmental Movements.” Pp. 115–42 in Comparative Environmental Politics: Theory, Practice, and Prospects, edited by SteinbergP. F.VandeveerS. D.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
PellowD. N.2007. Resisting Global Toxics: Transnational Movements for Environmental Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
PilatiK.2011. “Political Context, Organizational Engagement, and Protest in African Countries.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly16(3):351–68.
66.
ReddyM.2014. “The Transnationalization of Social Movements.” Pp. 334–58 in Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements, edited by Van Der HeijdenH.Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
67.
RohlingerD. A.2002. “Framing the Abortion Debate: Organizational Resources, Media Strategies, and Movement Countermovement Dynamics.” Sociological Quarterly43(4):479–507.
68.
RohlingerD. A.2015. Abortion Politics, Mass Media, and Social Movements in America. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
69.
SchockK.1999. “People Power and Political Opportunities: Social Movement Mobilization and Outcomes in the Philippines and Burma.” Social Problems46:355–75.
70.
ShriverT. E.AdamsA. E.2010. “Cycles of Repression and Tactical Innovation: The Evolution of Environmental Dissidence in Community Czechoslovakia.” Sociological Quarterly51:329–54.
71.
ShriverT. E.AdamsA. E.LongoS. B.2015. “Environmental Threats and Political Opportunities: Citizen Activism in the North Bohemian Coal Basin.” Social Forces94(2):699–722.
72.
SmithJ.2001. “Globalizing Resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the Future of Social Movements.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly6(1):1–20.
73.
SnowD.CressD.DowneyL.JonesA.1998. “Disrupting the ‘Quotidian’: Reconceptualizing the Relationship between Breakdown and the Emergence of Collective Action.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly3(1):1–22.
74.
SteinbergP. F.2001. Environmental Leadership in Developing Countries: Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75.
TarrowS.1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76.
TarrowS.2001. “Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science4:1–20.
77.
TaylorB.HadsellH.LorentzenL.ScarceR.1993. “Grass-roots Resistance: The Emergence of Popular Environmental Movements in Less Affluent Countries.” Pp. 69–90 in Environmental Politics in the International Arena: Movements, Parties, Organizations, and Policy, edited by KamienieckiS.Albany, NY: State University Press of New York.
78.
TaylorV.1989. “Social Movement Continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance.” American Sociological Review54(5):761–75.
79.
TsutsuiK.2006. “Redressing Past Human Rights Violations: Global Dimensions of Contemporary Social Movements.” Social Forces85(1):331–54.
80.
TsutsuiK.2018. Rights Make Might: Global Human Rights and Minority Social Movements in Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.
81.
TsutsuiK.ShinH. J.2008. “Global Norms, Local Activism, and Social Movement Outcomes: Global Human Rights and Resident Koreans in Japan.” Social Problems55(3):391–418.
82.
TsutsuiK.WhitlingerC.LimA.2012. “International Human Rights Law and Social Movements: States’ Resistance and Civil Society’s Insistence.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science8:367–96.
83.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
