This article investigates whether the commitment to social rights as integral to a well-functioning democracy exists among Americans in comparison with their European counterparts. In our comparison of data from the European Social Survey in 2012 with a special parallel module of the U.S. Cooperative Congressional Election Survey in 2014, the findings suggest that similar conceptions of ideal democracy are found on both sides of the Atlantic. Although Americans are less likely than Europeans to consider fighting poverty and reducing income inequality as important democratic ideals, the analysis shows that the United States is not exceptional in the existence of a social rights conception of democracy. A distinct feature of U.S. public opinion is that support for social rights is more strongly associated with a left-right divide than in Europe. The observed congruence between policy and public opinion in the United States highlights the importance of investigating the direction of causality between both phenomena.
AarøeLenePetersenMichael B.2014. “Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues”. Journal of Politics76(3):684–97.
2.
AgrestiAlan. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoAngeletosGeorge-Marios. 2005. “Fairness and Redistribution”. American Economic Review95(4):960–80.
4.
AlesinaAlbertoGlaeserEdward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
ArielyGal. 2011. “Exploring Citizenship Spheres of Inclusion/Exclusion: Rights as ‘Potential for Power.’”Patterns of Prejudice45(3):241–58.
6.
BonikowskiBartGidronNoam. 2016. “The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952–1996”. Social Forces94(4):1593–621.
7.
BulmerMartinReesAnthony M.1996. Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall. London, England: UCL Press.
8.
CollinsLinda M.LanzaStephanie T.2010. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
ConnellAndrew. 2012. “Civil Rights and Social Welfare: Some Thoughts on the Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall”. Political Quarterly83(3):551–59.
10.
Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). 2014. Team Module of the Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
11.
CormanJulianLevinDavid. 2016. “Support for Government Provision of Health Care and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”. Public Opinion Quarterly80(1):114–79.
12.
CoxRobert H.1998. “The Consequences of Welfare Reform: How Conceptions of Social Rights Are Changing”. Journal of Social Policy27(1):1–16.
13.
DaltonRussell J.WelzelChristian. 2014. The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DeckardNatalie D.HeslinAlison. 2016. “After Postnational Citizenship: Constructing the Boundaries of Inclusion in Neoliberal Contexts”. Sociology Compass10(4):294–305.
15.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
ESS Round 6. 2012. European Social Survey Round 6 (ESS-6) 2012. Data file edition 2.1. Bergen, Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
17.
ESS Round 6. 2014. European Social Survey Round 6 (ESS-6) 2012. Documentation report, edition 2.1, European Social Survey Data Archive. Bergen, Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
18.
GarfinkelIrwinRainwaterLeeSmeedingTimothy. 2010. Wealth and Welfare States: Is America a Laggard or Leader?New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HicksAlexander M.SwankDuane H.1992. “Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82”. American Political Science Review86(3):658–74.
20.
HoogheMarcMarienSofieOserJennifer. 2017. “Great Expectations: The Effect of Democratic Ideals on Political Trust in European Democracies”. Contemporary Politics23(2):214–30.
21.
HoogheMarcOserJennifer. Forthcoming. “Social and Political Citizenship in European Public Opinion: An Empirical Analysis of T. H. Marshall’s Concept of Social Rights”. Government and Opposition.
22.
HoogheMarcOserJenniferMarienSofie. 2016. “A Comparative Analysis of ‘Good Citizenship’: A Latent Class Analysis of Adolescents’ Citizenship Norms in 38 Countries”. International Political Science Review37(1):115–29.
23.
JacobsLawrenceSkocpolTheda. 2015. Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
JægerMads M.2006. “Welfare Regimes and Attitudes towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited”. European Sociological Review22(2):157–70.
25.
JægerMads M.2009. “United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution”. European Sociological Review25(6):723–36.
26.
KangShin-GooPowellG. BinghamJr.2010. “Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending”. Journal of Politics72(4):1014–28.
27.
KankarašMilošMoorsGuyVermuntJeroen K.2010. “Testing for Measurement Invariance with Latent Class Analysis”. Pp. 359–84 in Cross-cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications, edited by DavidovE.SchmidtP.BillietJ.New York: Routledge.
28.
KankarašMilošVermuntJeroen K.2014. “Simultaneous Latent Class Analysis across Groups”. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-being Research, edited by MichalosA. C.Heidelberg, Germany: Springer:5969-74.
29.
KorpiWalter. 1989. “Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship. Social Rights during Sickness in 18 OECD Countries”. American Sociological Review54(3):309–328.
30.
LipsetSeymour M.MarksGary. 2001. It Didn’t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
MagidsonJayVermuntJeroen K.2004. “Latent Class Models”. Pp. 175–98 in The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by KaplanD.London, England: Sage Publications.
33.
MarshallThomas H.1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MarshallThomas H.1964. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
35.
MarshallMonty G.GurrTed R.JaggersKeith. 2013. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013. Vienna, Austria: Center for Systemic Peace. Retrieved March7, 2017 (http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html).
36.
MeadLawrence M.1997. “Citizenship and Social Policy: T. H. Marshall and Poverty”. Social Philosophy & Policy14(2):197–230.
37.
MettlerSuzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
38.
MillerDavid. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
NylundKaren L.AsparouhovTihomirMuthénBengt O.2007. “Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study”. Structural Equation Modeling14(4):535–69.
40.
ObamaBarack. 2016. “United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps”. Journal of the American Medical Association316(5):525–32.
41.
O’BrienTimothy L.NoyShiri. 2015. “Traditional, Modern, and Post-secular Perspectives on Science and Religion in the United States”. American Sociological Review80(1):92–115.
42.
OserJennifer.2017. “Assessing How Participators Combine Acts in Their ‘Political Tool Kits’: A Person-centered Measurement Approach for Analyzing Citizen Participation”. Social Indicators Research. Published online before print May30, 2016, doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1364-8.
43.
QuadagnoJillPedersonJo-Ellen. 2012. “Has Support for Social Security Declined? Attitudes toward the Public Pension Scheme in the USA, 2000 and 2010”. International Journal of Social Welfare21(s1):S88–S100.
44.
ReviBen. 2014. “TH Marshall and His Critics: Reappraising ‘Social Citizenship’ in the Twenty-first Century”. Citizenship Studies18(3–4):452–64.
45.
ScruggsLyleAllanJames P.2006. “The Material Consequences of Welfare States: Benefit Generosity and Absolute Poverty in 16 OECD Countries”. Comparative Political Studies39(7):880–904.
46.
SomersMargaret R.2008. Genealogies of Citizenship: Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
TelesSteven M.1998. “Why Is There No Affirmative Action in Britain?”American Behavioral Scientist41(7):1004–1026.
48.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2016. Social Expenditure Update (November2016). Paris, France: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
