This article examines social shareholder advocacy and socially responsible investing (SRI) to better understand the marketization of activism and the intersection of business and social justice. We use archival, interview, and participant observation data to explore how social shareholder activism has increasingly come to be practiced for profit. We show how the movement’s history in social justice activism of the 1960s and 1970s continues to shape the practice today, even while it is increasingly commodified, marketized, and shaped by the ideals and practices of business and finance. Shareholder activists and other SRI advocates have created a new market and a hybrid form of investing that melds social and environmental concerns with financial profit. However, as the fundamental principles of capital accumulation remain unaltered, these practitioners find themselves pulled and pushed between the competing logics of activist ideals and investment finance.
BattilanaJulieDoradoSylvia. 2010. “Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal53 (6): 1419-1440.
4.
BleeKathleenTaylorVerta. 2002. “The Uses of Semi-Structured Interviews in Social Movement Research.” In KlandermansBertStaggenborgSuzanne, eds., Methods in Social Movement Research, pp. 92-117. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BourdieuPierreWacquantLoïc. 1992. Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
BurchellJonCookJoanne. 2006. “Assessing the Impact of Stakeholder Dialogue: Changing Relationships between NGOs and Companies.” Journal of Public Affairs6:210–27.
7.
DauvergnePeterLeBaronGenevieve. 2014. Protest, Inc.: The Corporatization of Activism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
8.
ErnstYoung. 2012. Four Key Trends of the 2012 Proxy Season: Engagement Drives Change. Ernst & Young, LP.
9.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2011. “Towards a Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory29:1–26.
10.
GreenwoodRoystonRaynardMiaKodeihFarahMicelottaEvelyn R.LounsburyMichael. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” The Academy of Management Annals5(1): 317-371.
11.
GuthmanJulie. 2004. Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
HawkenPaul. 2004. Socially Responsible Investing: How the SRI Industry Has Failed to Respond to People Who Want to Invest with Conscience and What Can Be Done to Change It. Sausalito, CA: Natural Capital Institute.
JaffeeDaniel. 2012. “Weak Coffee: Certification and Co-optation in the Fair Trade Movement.” Social Problems59(1):94–116.
15.
JaffeeDanielHowardPhilip H.2010. “Corporate Cooptation of Organic and Fair Trade Standards.” Agriculture and Human Values27(4):387–99.
16.
JohnstonJosée Johnston. 2008. “The Citizen-consumer Hybrid: Ideological Tensions and the Case of Whole Foods Market.” Theory and Society37(3): 229-70.
17.
KingSamantha. 2006. Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
LeeMin-Dong PaulLounsburyMichael. 2011. “Domesticating Radical Rant and Rage: An Exploration of the Consequences of Environmental Shareholder Resolutions on Corporate Environmental Performance.” Business & Society50(1):155–88.
19.
LichtermanPaul. 2002. “Seeing Structure Happen: Theory-Driven Participant Observation.” In KlandermansBertStaggenborgSuzanne, eds., Methods of Social Movements Research, pp. 118–145. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
LogsdonJeanne M.Van BurenHarry J.III. 2008. “Justice and Large Corporations: What do Activists Shareholder Want?”Business & Society47(4):523–48.
21.
LogsdonJeanne M.HarryJ.Van BurenIII. 2009. “Beyond the Proxy Vote: Dialogues Between Shareholder Activists and Corporations.” Journal of Business Ethics87: 353– 365.
22.
LounsburyMichael. 2005. “Institutional Variation in the Evolution of Social Movements: Competing Logics and the Spread of Recycling Advocacy Groups.” Pp. 73–95 in Social Movements and Organizational Theory, edited by DavisG.McAdamD.Richard ScottW.ZaldM. N.New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LounsburyMichaelVentrescaMarcHirschPaul M.2003. “Social Movements, Field Frames and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective on U.S. Recycling.” Socio-Economic Review203(1):71–104.
24.
MarensRichard. 2008. “Going to War with the Army You Have: Labor’s Shareholder Activism in an Era of Financial Hegemony.” Business & Society47(3):312–42.
NickelPatricia M.EikenberryAngela M.2009. “A Critique of the Discourse of Marketized Philanthropy.” American Behavioral Scientist52:974–89.
30.
NybergDanielWrightChristopher. 2013. “Corporate Corruption of the Environment: Sustainability as a Process of Compromise.” British Journal of Sociology64(3):405–24.
31.
O’RourkeAnastasia. 2003. “A New Politics of Engagement: Shareholder Activism for Social Responsibility.” Business Strategy and the Environment12:227–39.
32.
PacheAnne-ClaireSantosFilipe M.2010. “When Worlds Collide:The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review35(3), 455-476.
33.
PellowDavid N.SchnaibergAllanWeinbergAdam. 2000. “Putting the Ecological Modernisation Thesis to the Test: The Promises and Performances of Urban Recycling.” Environmental Politics9(1):109–37.
34.
RaoHayagreeva. 2009. Market Rebels: How Activists Make or Break Radical Innovations. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
35.
SalazarArturo. 2007. Social Screening in the Mutual Fund Industry: An Analysis of Calvert Fund. IR/PS CSR Case #07–23. San Diego, CA: Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California.
36.
SnowDavidSouleSarah A.2010. A Primer on Social Movements. New York: W.W. Norton.
37.
SoederbergSuzanne. 2009. “The Marketization of Social Justice.” New Political Economy14(2):211–29.
38.
SouleSarah A.2009. Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
StraussAnselmCorbinJuliet. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW.1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990.” American Journal of Sociology105 (3): 801-843.
41.
TkacPaula. 2006. “One Proxy at a Time: Pursuing Social Change through Shareholder Proposals.” Economic Review91(3):1–20.
