This article draws from criminological research on victimization and on organizational models of the social context of sexual harassment to propose a routine activities explanation of sexual harassment victimization. The authors propose that certain features of organizations can be used to conceptualize guardianship as well as the proximity component of target suitability in the routine activities framework. The authors also discuss the features of individuals (target attractiveness) that may make them more or less susceptible to victimization, holding organizational features constant. They test hypotheses from a routine activities explanation of sexual harassment using data from a national company in the U.S. telephone industry. The authors find general support for the importance of both organizational features and individual characteristics in the prediction of sexual harassment victimization. However, they find little evidence that individual characteristics and organizational features interact in the production of harassment victimization, which is counter to a routine activities approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arvey, R. D.
, & Cavanaugh, M. A. (1995). Using surveys to assess the prevalence of sexual harassment: Some methodological problems. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 39-52.
2.
Berk, R. A.
(1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386-398.
3.
Brownmiller, S.
(1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
Bursik, R.J., Jr.
(1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26, 519-551.
5.
Clarke, R. V.
, & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders' decisions: A framework for policy and research. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 6). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Clarke, R. V.
, & Felson, M. (1993). Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In C. V. Felson & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 5). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
Cohen, J.
, & Cohen, P. (1985). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Cohen, L. E.
, & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
9.
Cohen, L. E.
, Kluegel, J. R., & Land, K. C. (1981). Social inequality and criminal victimization. American Sociological Review, 46, 505-524.
10.
Collins, J. J.
, Cox, B. G., & Langan, P. A. (1987). Job activities and personal crime victimization: Implications for theory. Social Science Research, 16, 345-360.
11.
Farley, L.
(1978). Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Fitzgerald, L. F.
, Hulin, C. L., & Drasgow, F. (1994). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: An integrated model. In G. P. Keita & J. J. Hurrell, Jr. (Eds.), Job stress in a changing work force: Investigating gender, diversity, and family issues (pp. 55-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
Gartner, R.
, & McCarthy, B. (1991). The social distribution of femicide in urban Canada, 1921-1988. Law and Society Review, 25, 287-311.
14.
Gottfredson, M.
, & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
Groth, A. N.
(with Birnbaum, H. J.). 1979. Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. New York: Plenum.
16.
Gutek, B.
(1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
17.
Gutek, B.
(1989). Sexuality in the workplace: Key issues in social research and organizational practice. In J. Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, & G. Burrell (Eds.), The sexuality of organization (pp. 56-70). London: Sage Ltd.
18.
Gutek, B. A.
, Cohen, A. G. (1985). Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men's and women's experiences. Human Relations, 40, 97-115.
19.
Gutek, B. A.
, Cohen, A. G., & Konrad, A. (1990). Predicting sexual harassment at work: A contact hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 560-577.
20.
Gutek, B. A.
, & Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28-48.
21.
Gutek, B. A.
, & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex ratios, sex-spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. The Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55-74.
22.
Hindelang, M. J.
(1976). Criminal victimization in eight American cities: A descriptive analysis of common theft and assault. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23.
Hindelang, M. J.
, Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24.
Hough, M.
(1987). Offenders' choice of target: Findings from victim surveys. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 355-369.
25.
Hulin, C. L.
, Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In M. S. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace (pp. 127-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Jensen, G. F.
, & Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity. Violence and Victims, 1, 85-99.
27.
Katz, J.
(1994). Empirical and theoretical dimensions of obscene phone calls to women in the U.S.Human Communications Research, 21, 155-182.
28.
Kennedy, L. W.
& Forde, D. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28, 137-152.
29.
Long, J. S.
(1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Lynch, J. P.
(1987). Routine activities and victimization at work. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 283-300.
31.
MacKinnon, C.
(1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
MacKinnon, C.
(1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Massey, J. L.
, Krohn, M. D., & Bonati, L. M. (1989). Property crime and the routine activities of individuals. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 26, 378-400.
34.
Messerschmidt, J. W.
(1986). Capitalism, patriarchy, and crime: Toward a socialist feminist criminology. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
Messner, S. F.
& Tardiff, K. (1985). The social ecology of urban homicide: An application of the routine activities approach. Criminology, 23, 241-267.
36.
Miethe, T. D.
, & Meier, R. F. (1990). Opportunity, choice and criminal victimization: A test of a theoretical model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 243-266.
37.
Miethe, T.
, Stafford, M., & Long, S. (1987). Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. American Sociological Review, 52, 184-194.
38.
O'Brien, R.
(1991). Sex ratios and rape rates: A power-control theory. Criminology, 29, 99-114.
39.
O'Farrell, B.
& Harlan, S. (1982). Craftworkers and clerks: The effect of male coworker hostility on women's satisfaction with nontraditional jobs. Social Problems, 29, 252-265.
40.
Pryor, J. B.
, Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model of predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69-84.
41.
Quina, K.
(1997). The victimization of women. In L. L. O'Toole & J. R. Schiffman (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 164-171). New York: New York University Press.
42.
Rabinowitz, V. C.
(1990). Coping with sexual harassment. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Ivory Power: Sexual Harassment on Campus (pp. 103-118). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
43.
Rogers, J. K.
, & Henson, K. D. (1997). Hey, why don't you wear a shorter skirt? Structural vulnerability and the organization of sexual harassment in temporary clerical employment. Gender and Society, 11, 215-237.
44.
Rountree, P. W.
, Land, K. C., & Miethe, T. D. (1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology, 32, 387-414.
45.
Sampson, R. J.
(1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7-40.
46.
Sampson, R. J.
(1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
47.
Sampson, R. J.
, & Lauretson, J. L. (1990). Deviant lifestyles, proximity to crime, and the offender-victim link in personal violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 110-139.
48.
Saunders, B. E.
(1992). Sexual harassment of women in the workplace: Results from the National Women's Study. Paper presented at the 8th annual North Carolina/South Carolina Labor Law Seminar, Asheville, NC.
49.
Schwendinger, H.
, & Schwendinger, J. (1983). Rape and inequality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50.
Shaw, C. R.
, & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Sherman, L. W.
, Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-55.
52.
Stockdale, M. S.
(1993). The role of sexual misperceptions of women's friendliness in an emerging theory of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 84-101.
53.
Tangri, S. S.
, Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33-54.
54.
Walby, S.
(1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
