This article examines East-West differences in work values among German women, using data from the 1991 German Social Survey (ALLBUS). Our analyses indicate a clear regional gap in work values: East German women are more likely than West German women to consider employment to be very important and to highly value its socioeconomic and social rewards. We contend that this gap exists because of the effect of preunification differences in state ideology and policy on the life experiences of German women in the two regions. We discuss the implications of the findings for the claim that East Germany was more successful than West Germany in fostering positive attitudes toward market work among women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, M. A.
, & Brayfield, A. A. (1992). Perceptions of women's opportunities in the FRG and the UK. Mid-American Review of Sociology, 16, 45-60.
2.
Adler, M. A.
, & Brayfield, A. (1996). East-West differences in attitudes about employment and family in Germany. The Sociological Quarterly, 37, 401-416.
3.
Alwin, D. F.
, Braun, M., & Scott, J. (1992). The separation of work and the family: Attitudes towards women's labor force participation in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 8, 13-37.
4.
Beyer, M.
(1992). The situation of East German women in postunification Germany. Women's Studies International Forum, 15, 111-114.
5.
Braun, M.
, Scott, J., & Alwin, D. F. (1994). Economic necessity or self-actualization? Attitudes toward women's labor force participation in East and West Germany. European Sociological Review, 10, 29-47.
6.
Bundesanstalt für Arbeit. (1992). Frauenerwerbstätigkeit und Teilzeitarbeit (Auszug aus der Arbeitsmarktanalyse 1991) [Women's employment and part-time work]. Informationen für die Beratungs—und Vermittlungsdienste 33 (pp. 1983-2001). Nürnberg, Germany: IBV.
7.
Bundesanstalt für Arbeit. (1995). Arbeitsmarkt 1994 (Doku 13) [Labor market 1994]. Informationen für die Beratungs—und Vermittlungsdienste 28 (pp. 837-860). Nümberg, Germany: IBV.
8.
Bütow, B. (1992). Frauenerwerbsarbeit in den neuen Bundesländern und Anforderungen an Frauenpolitik—am Beispiel von empirischen Ergebnissen einer soziologischen Studie aus Sachsen [Women's employment in the new federal states and tasks for women's policy—an example of empirical results of a sociological study in Saxony]. Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis, 15, 376-393.
9.
Chamberlayne, P.
(1995). Gender and the private sphere: A touchstone of misunderstanding between Eastern and Western Germany. Social Politics, 2, 23-36.
10.
Daniels, A. K.
(1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34, 403-415.
11.
Davis, N. J.
, & Robinson, R. V. (1991). Men's and women's consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 56, 72-84.
12.
de Vaus, D.
, & McAllister, I. (1991). Gender and work orientation: Values and satisfaction in Western Europe. Work and Occupations, 18, 72-93.
13.
Dölling, I.
(1989). Culture and gender. In M. Rueschemeyer & C. Lemke (Eds.), The quality of life in the German Democratic Republic (pp. 27-47). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
14.
Eberstadt, N.
(1994). Demographic shocks after communism: Eastern Germany, 1989-1993. Population and Development Review, 10, 137-152.
15.
Einhorn, B.
(1992). German Democratic Republic—Emancipated women or hardworking mothers. In C. Corrin (Ed.), Superwomen and the double burden (pp. 125-154). Toronto: Second Story Press.
16.
Ferree, M. M.
(1993). The rise and fall of “Mommie Politics”: Feminism and unification in (East) Germany. Feminist Studies, 19, 89-115.
17.
Gerhard, U.
(1992). German women and the social cost of unification. German Politics and Society, 24/25, 16-33.
18.
Goldberg, G. S.
(1991). Women on the verge: Winners and losers in German unification. Social Policy, 22, 34-44.
19.
Habich, R., Landua, D., Seifert, W., & Spellerberg, A. (1991). Ein unbekanntes Land—objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives Wohlbefinden in Ostdeutschland [An unknown country—objective living conditions and subjective well-being in East Germany]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 32, 13-33.
20.
Hakim, C.
(1991). Grateful slaves and self-made women: Fact and fantasy in women's work orientations. European Sociological Review, 7, 101-121.
21.
Hakim, C.
(1995). Five feminist myths about women's employment. British Journal of Sociology, 46, 429-455.
22.
Haller, M.
, & Hoellinger, F. (1994). Female employment and the change of gender roles: The conflictual relationship between participation and attitudes in international comparison. International Sociology, 9, 87-112.
23.
Harris, C.
, & Earle, J. (1986). Gender and work values: Survey findings from a working-class sample. Sex Roles, 15, 487-494.
24.
Kalleberg, A. L.
, & Stark, D. (1993). Career strategies in capitalism and socialism: Work values and job rewards in the United States and Hungary. Social Forces, 72, 181-198.
25.
Kolinsky, E.
(1992). Women in the new Germany: The East-West divide. In G. Smith, W. Paterson, P. Merkl, & S. Padgett (Eds.), Developments in German politics (pp. 264-280). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
Kolinsky, E.
(1993). Women in contemporary Germany. New York: Berg.
27.
Lewis, S.
(1992). Introduction. In S. Lewis, D. N. Izraeli, & H. Hootsmans (Eds.), Dual-earner families: International perspectives (pp. 1-18). London: Sage.
28.
Marsden, P. V.
, Kalleberg, A., & Cook, C. R. (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment: Influences of work positions and family roles. Work and Occupations, 20, 368-390.
29.
Mohler, P.P., Braun, M., Scheuch, E. K., & Hader, M. (1992). German Social Survey (ALLBUS). Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung and Mannheim, Germany: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden, und Analyses (ZUMA) and Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.
30.
Neil, C. C.
, & Snizek, W. E. (1987). Work values, job characteristics, and gender. Sociological Perspective, 30, 245-265.
31.
Nickel, H. M.
(1992). Women in the German Democratic Republic and in the Federal States: Looking backwards and forwards. German Politics and Society, 24-25, 34-52.
32.
Ostner, I.
(1994). Independence and dependency: Options and constraints for women over the life course. Women's Studies International Forum, 17, 129-139.
33.
Rowe, R.
, & Snizek, W. E. (1995). Gender differences in work values: Perpetuating the myth. Work and Occupations, 22, 215-229.
34.
Schaeffer-Hegel, B.
(1992). Makers and victims of unification: German women and the two Germanies. Women's Studies International Forum, 15, 101-110.
35.
Schäfgen, K. (1992). Damals gebraucht, heute verdrängt—Frauenalltag und -arbeit in der DDR als (eine) Ursache für ihre massenhafte Verdrängung vom Arbeitsmarkt [Needed in the past and pushed out today—women's everyday life and work in the GDR as (one) cause of their massive exit from the labor market]. Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Frauenforschung Bulletin, 4, 12-25.
36.
Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.). (1992). Datenreport 1992. Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundes-republik Deutschland [Data report 1992. Figures and facts about the FRG]. Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
37.
Winkler, G.
(Ed.). (1990). Frauenreport 90 [Women's report 90]. Berlin: Verlag Die Wirtschaft Berlin GmbH.
