Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The uniqueness of Korean work attitudes is described with a survey of 1,288 blue-collar and white-collar workers in the 10 largest Korean conglomerate business firms. Compared to the Lincoln-Kalleberg survey results for Japanese and U.S. workers, the Korean survey results indicate that Korean workers harbor a discrepancy between their expectations toward work and their evaluations of their actual situations. Korean workers tend to be more committed to and satisfied with their work but less proud of their jobs and companies than Japanese and U.S. workers. The findings suggest that several factors, including culture, industrialization, labor market conditions, and labor policies, influence work attitude formation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abegglen, J. C. (1958). The Japanese factory: Aspects of its social organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Amsden, H. (1989). Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bae, K. (1987). Korean automobile workers. Seoul, Korea: Seoul National University Press.

Bae, K. (1989). Labor strategy for industrialization in South Korea. Pacific Affairs, 62, 353-363.

Bae, K. (1993). A theoretical approach to industrial conflict in a rapidly industrializing country: The Korean case. Korean Journal of Population and Development, 22(2), 137-153.

Bae, K. , & Form, W. (1986). Payment strategy in South Korea's advanced economic sector. American Sociological Review, 51, 120-131.

Bae, K. , & Form, W. (1988). Convergence theory and the Korean connection. Social Forces, 66, 618-644.

Cumings, B. (1987). The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consciousness. In F. Deyo (Ed.), The political economy of the New Asian in industrialism (pp. 44-83). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Dore, R. (1973). British factory-Japanese factory: The origins of diversity in industrial relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

10.

Form, W. (1972). Technology and social behavior of workers in four countries: A sociological perspective. American Sociological Review, 37, 727-738.

11.

Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

12.

Halaby, C. N. (1986). Work attachment and workplace authority. American Sociological Review, 51, 34-49.

13.

Han, W -K. (1980). The history of Korea (K. Lee, Trans.). Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.

14.

Jin, S. (1995). Industrial democracy: Politics of production and culture. Korean Journal of Sociology, 29, 757-787.

15.

Johnson, C. (1987). Political institutions and economic performance: The government-business relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In F. Deyo (Ed.), The political economy of the New Asian industrialism (pp. 136-164). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

16.

Kerr, C. , Dunlop, J. T. , Harbison, F. , & Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

17.

Lincoln, J. R. , & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Taira, K. (1962). Characteristics of Japanese labor markets. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 10, 150-168.

19.

Vogel, E. F. (1963). Japan's new middle class. Berkeley: University of California Press.

20.

Yoo, H. J. , Lee, E. J. , & Lee, J. T. (1995). Technological and structural characteristics of production organization and worker attitudes and perception. Korean Journal of Sociology, 27, 319-341.

Cultural Values and Work Attitudes of Korean Industrial Workers in Comparison with those of the United States and Japan

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References