This study argues that job and workplace characteristics, in addition to individual and household characteristics, are important predictors of class identity among women office workers. This expands on earlier research findings on the importance of women's own socioeconomic status (SES) characteristics as predictors of class identity. The author also addresses whether class identity is related to (a) “proletarianized” working conditions, (b) office automation, and (c) organizational context. The results show that both intrinsic job rewards and work autonomy are associated with a more middle-class identity. Although greater use of video display terminals is linked with a more working-class identity, office workers in small office settings become more middle class in their identity the longer the office has been automated. This suggests that organizational context may mediate the relationship between automation and class identity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Attewell, P.
(1987) The deskilling controversy. Work and Occupations, 3, 323-346.
2.
Beechey, V.
(1987). Unequal work. London: Verso/New Left Books.
3.
Braverman, H.
(1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
4.
Carter, V.
(1987). Office technology and relations of control in clerical work organization. In Barbara Drygulski Wright (Ed.), Women, Work and Technology (pp. 202-219). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
5.
Carter, V.
(Forthcoming). Automation and autonomy among university office workers: Deconstructing the monolithic workplace. Sociology Forum.
6.
Centers, R.
(1949). The psychology of the social classes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Crompton, R.
, & Jones, G. (1984). White-collar proletariat. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
Daft, R. L.
(1992). Organization theory and design. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
9.
Davis, N. J.
, & Robinson, R. V. (1988). Class identification of men and women in the 1970s and 1980s. American Sociological Review, 53, 103-112.
10.
Dewar, R.
, & Hage, J. (1978). Size, technology, complexity and structural differentiation: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 111-136.
11.
Edwards, R.
(1979). Contested terrain. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Form, W.
, Kaufman, R. L., Parcel, T. L., & Wallace, M. (1988). The impact of technology on work organization and work outcomes. In G. Farkas & P. England (Eds.), Industries, firms, and jobs: Sociological and economic approaches (pp. 303-328). New York: Plenum.
13.
Giddens, A.
(1982). Class structuration and class consciousness. In A. Giddens & D. Held (Eds.), Class, power and conflict (pp. 157-174). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Glenn, E. N.
, & Feldberg, R. L. (1977). Degraded and deskilled: The proletarianization of clerical work. Social Problems, 25, 52-64.
15.
Glenn, E. N.
, & Feldberg, R. L. (1979a). Proletarianizing clerical work: Technology and organizational control in the office. In A. Zimbalist (Ed.), Case studies on the labor process (pp. 51-72). Chicago: University of Chicago.
16.
Goldberg, R.
(1983). Organizing women office workers. New York: Praeger.
17.
Halle, D.
(1984). America's working man. Chicago: University of Chicago.
18.
Hodge, R. W.
, & Treiman, D. J. (1968). Class identification in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 535-547.
19.
Jackman, M. R.
, & Jackman, R. W. (1983). Class awareness in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Kalleberg, A. L.
(1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 38, 569-582.
21.
Kelley, M. R.
(1990). New process technology, job design, and work organization: A contingency approach. American Sociological Review, 55, 191-208.
22.
Machung, A. (1983). From psyche to technic: The politics of office work. Unpublished dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
23.
Mann, M.
(1980). Consciousness and action among the Western working class. London: Macmillan.
24.
Matteis, R. J.
(1979). The new back office focuses on customer service. Harvard Business Review, 57, 146-159.
25.
Oppenheimer, M.
(1985). White-collar politics. New York: Monthly Review Press.
26.
Ritter, K. V.
, & Hargens, L. L. (1975). Occupational positions and class identification: A test of the asymmetry hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 934-948.
27.
Rytina, N. F.
, & Bianchi, S. M. (1984, March). Occupational reclassification and changes in distribution by gender. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 11-17.
28.
Simpson, T. H.
, Stark, D., & Jackson, R. A. (1988). Class identification processes of married, working men and women. American Sociological Review, 53, 284-293.
29.
Sobel, R.
(1989). The white-collar working class. New York: Praeger.
30.
Stark, D.
(1982). Class struggle and the transformation of the labour process: A relational approach. In A. Giddens & D. Held (Eds.), Class, power and conflict (pp. 310-329). Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
U.S. Department of Labor
. (1983). Time of change: 1983 handbook on women workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
Vallas, S. P.
(1987). The labor process as a source of class consciousness: A critical examination. Sociological Forum, 2, 237-256.
33.
Vanneman, R.
, & Pampel, F. C. (1977). The American perception of class and status. American Sociological Review, 42, 422-437.
34.
West, J.
(1982). New technology and women's office work. In J. West (Ed.), Work, women and the labour market (pp. 61-79). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35.
Wright, E. O.
(1985). Classes. London: New Left Books.
36.
Zetka, J. R., Jr.
(1991). Automated environments, institutional environments, and skilled labor processes: Toward an institutional theory of automation outcomes. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 557-574.
