Eliot Freidson's Contribution to the Sociology of Professions

Abstract

This article discusses three major contributions of Eliot Freidson to the sociology of professions: (a) Freidson's work introduces a new concept of the professions rooted in the social organization of labor markets. This concept is far more harmonious with the contemporary situation of professions than any previous effort to conceptualize the differences between professions and other occupations. (b) The work provides an analysis of the spheres of professional control that result from the knowledge monopolies and gatekeeping activities of the professions. In this analysis, Freidson provides a new perspective on the meaning and social consequences of applied knowledge. (c) In a more humanistic vein, the work provides a measured defense of professions in the face of critics who see their powers as unnecessary, harmful, or both. The article concludes by commenting on a paradox suggested by Freidson's work. This paradox concerns the simultaneous strength and weakness of the contemporary professions, their strength as market shelters and their weakness as a status category and as activities connected to the larger political economy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.

Collins, R. (1979). The credential society. New York: Academic Press.

Derber, C. (1982). The proletarianization of the professional: A review essay. In C. Derber (Ed.), Professionals as workers: Mental labor in advanced capitalism (pp. 13-33). Boston: G. K. Hall.

Dingwall, R. (1976). Accomplishing profession. Sociological Review, 24, 331-349.

Elliot, P. (1972). The sociology of professions. London: Macmillan.

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

Freedman, M. (1976). Labor markets: Segments and shelters. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.

Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead.

Freidson, E. (1973a). Professions and the occupational principle. In E. Freidson (Ed.), Professions and their prospects (pp. 19-37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.

Freidson, E. (1973b). Professionalization and the organization of middle-class labor in postindustrial society. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 47-59.

11.

Freidson, E. (1975). The deprofessionalization of everyone? Sociological Focus, 3, 197-213.

12.

Freidson, E. (1982). Occupational autonomy and labor market shelters. In P. Stewart & M. Cantor (Eds.), Varieties of work (pp. 39-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Freidson, E. (1983a). The reorganization of the professions by regulation. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 279-290.

14.

Freidson, E. (1983b). The theory of professions: State of the art. In R. Dingwall & P. Lewis (Eds.), The sociology of professions: Doctors, lawyers and others (pp. 19-37). London: Macmillan.

15.

Freidson, E. (1984a). The changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 1-20.

16.

Freidson, E. (1984b). Are professions necessary? In T.L. Haskell (Ed.), The authority of experts: Studies in history and theory (pp. 3-27). Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.

17.

Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Haug, M. (1973). Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 195-211.

19.

Illich, I. (1980). Toward a history of needs. New York: Bantam.

20.

Johnson, T. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan.

21.

Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

22.

Larson, M. S. (1980). Proletarianization and educated labor. Theory and Society, 9, 131-175.

23.

Millerson, G. (1964). The qualifying associations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

24.

Oppenheimer, M. (1973). The proletarianization of the professional. Sociological Review Monographs, 20, 213-227.

25.

Parkin, F. (1979). Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. New York: Columbia University Press.

26.

Veysey, L. R. (1988). Higher education as a profession: Changes and discontinuities. In N. O. Hatch (Ed.), Professions and American history (pp. 15-32). South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

27.

Webster's third international dictionary of the English language unabridged. (1967, vol. 2). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.

28.

Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70, 137-158.