This article uses longitudinal career history data for the period 1982 through 1990 to explore the mechanisms that produce a gender gap in earnings among writers in the television industry. Two models of labor market dynamics are compared. The first is a model of cumulative disadvantage whereby differential access to opportunity is increasingly consequential over the course of writers' careers. The second is a model of continuous disadvantage whereby the contributions of women writers are uniformly devalued across career stages. The results strongly support the model of continuous disadvantage and show that a narrowing of the wage gap is limited to very recent cohorts of writers. The article describes how unstructured labor market arrangements in the entertainment industry sustain the process of continuous disadvantage and discusses implications for labor market issues more generally.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, P. D.
, Long, J. S., & Krauz, T. K. (1982) Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615-625.
2.
Bielby, D. D.
, & Bielby, W. T. (1991, November). Older writers' participation in television production. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco.
3.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Baron, J. N. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759-799.
4.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Bielby, D. D. (1987a). The 1987 Hollywood writers report: A study of ethnic, gender and age employment practices. Los Angeles: Writers Guild of America, West.
5.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Bielby, D. D. (1987b). Employment opportunities for television writers: Continuity and change from 1960 to the present. Los Angeles: Writers Guild of America, West.
6.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Bielby, D. D. (1989). The 1989 Hollywood writers report: Unequal access, unequal pay. Los Angeles: Writers Guild of America, West.
7.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Bielby, D. D. (1990, August). Organizational concentration and the diversity of network television programming. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
8.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Bielby, D. D. (1991, August). “Tried and true is dead and buried”: Genre, institutionalized decision-making, and claims to uniqueness in prime time television. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, OH.
9.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Bielby, D. D. (1992). The 1992 Hollywood writers report. Los Angeles: Writers Guild of America, West.
10.
Brewer, M. B.
, & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219-243.
11.
DiMaggio, P.
(1977). Market structure, the creative process, and popular culture: Toward an organizational reinterpretation of mass culture theory. Journal of Popular Culture, 11, 433-451.
12.
Faulkner, R. R.
(1983). Music on demand: Composers and careers in the Hollywood film industry. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
13.
Faulkner, R. R.
, & Anderson, A. B. (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 879-909.
14.
Goldin, C.
(1990). Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Hirsch, P. M.
(1972). Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 639-659.
16.
Jacobs, J. A.
(1989). Revolving doors: Sex segregation in women's careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Kanter, R. M.
(1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Polachek, S. W.
(1979). Occupational segregation among women: Theory, evidence, and a prognosis. In C. B. Lloyd, E. S. Andrews, & C. L. Gilroy (Eds.), Women in the labor market (pp. 137-157). New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
Reskin, B. F.
, & Roos, P. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women's inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
Roos, P. A.
, & Reskin, B. (1984). Institutional factors affecting job access and mobility for women: A review of institutional explanations for job segregation. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 235-260). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
Ruble, D. N.
, & Ruble, T. L. (1982). Sex stereotypes. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 188-252). New York: Praeger.
22.
Salancik, G. R.
, & Pfeffer, J. (1978). Uncertainty, secrecy, and the choice of similar others. Social Psychology, 41, 246-255.
23.
Stinchcombe, A.
(1959). Bureaucratic and craft administration of production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 168-187.
24.
Steenland, S.
(1990). What's wrong with this picture?Washington, DC: National Commission on Working Women.
25.
Tetlock, P. E.
(1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 297-332). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
