This article examines employment continuity for three succeeding cohorts of women in their 20s who would be typically experiencing early life-cycle transitions to marriage and parenthood. Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Young Women, women's work attachment is analyzed over 5-year periods during the 1970s, a decade of rapid social change. Two competing explanations are presented to account for the expected increase in women's employment continuity: (a) A growing number of women have characteristics traditionally conducive to employment, and (b) the employment behavior of those who have typically worked intermittently has increasingly resembled that of women who have typically worked more continuously. Findings show that the impact of behavioral change was far more significant than changes in women's characteristics. The implications of these results for models of female labor force participation are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beller, A. H.
(1982). Occupational segregation by sex: Determinants and changes. Journal of Human Resources, 17, 371-392.
2.
Beller, A. H.
(1985). Changes in the sex composition of U.S. occupations, 1960-1981. Journal of Human Resources, 20, 335-350.
3.
Bielby, D.
, & Bielby, W. T. (1984). Work commitment and sex-role attitudes. American Sociological Review, 49, 234-247.
4.
Cohen, J.
, & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multivariate regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
5.
Corcoran, K.
, Duncan, G., & Ponza, M. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of white women's wages. Journal of Human Resources, 18, 497-520.
6.
Desai, S.
, Leibowitz, A., & Waite, L. (1989, March). Women's labor force participation before and after their first birth: The effect of occupational characteristics and work commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Baltimore, MD.
7.
Elder, G. H., Jr.
(1978). Family history and the life course. In T. K. Hareven (Ed.), Transitions: The family and the life course in historical perspective (pp. 17-64). New York: Academic Press.
8.
England, P.
(1984). Wage appreciation and depreciation: A test of neoclassical economic explanations of occupational sex segregation. Social Forces, 62, 147-168.
9.
England, P.
, Farkas, G., Dou, T., & Kilbourne, B. (1988). Explaining occupational segregation and wages: Findings from a model with fixed effects. American Sociological Review, 53, 544-558.
10.
Fullerton, H.
(1982). How accurate were projections for the 1980 labor force?Monthly Labor Review, 105, 15-21.
11.
Gwartney-Gibbs, P.
(1987, August). Women's work intensity and the origins of occupational sex segregation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.
12.
Heilman, M.
(1978, August). Male and female reactions to altered sex ratios in male-dominated occupations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
13.
Hill, M.
, & O'Neill, J. (1989, March). A dynamic model of women's work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Baltimore, MD.
14.
Huber, J.
, & Spitze, G. (1981). Wives' employment, household behavior, and sex-role attitudes. Social Forces, 60, 150-169.
15.
Iams, H.
, & Thomton, A. (1975). Decomposition of differences: A cautionary note. Sociological Methods and Research, 3, 341-352.
16.
Johnson, C.
, Sum, A., & Weill, J. (1988). Vanishing dreams: The growing economic plight of America's young families. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund; Boston: Northeastern University, Center for Labor Market Studies.
17.
Jones, F.
, & Kelley, J. (1984). Decomposing differences between groups: A cautionary note on measuring discrimination. Sociological Methods and Research, 12, 323-343.
18.
Lillard, L.
, & Macunovich, D. (1989, March). Why the baby bust cohorts haven't boomed yet: A reconsideration of cohort variables in labor market analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Baltimore, MD.
19.
O'Rand, A.
(1981). Socioeconomic status and poverty. In D. Mangen & W. L. Petersen (Eds.), Handbook of research instruments in gerontology (Vol. 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
O'Rand, A.
, & Henretta, J. C. (1982). Early family and work careers, industrial pension structure and early retirement among unmarried women. American Sociological Review, 47, 365-373.
21.
Rexroat, C.
(1985). Women's work expectations and labor-market experience in early and middle family life-cycle stages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 131-142.
22.
Rexroat, C.
, & Shehan, C. (1984). Expected versus actual work roles of women. American Sociological Review, 49, 349-358.
23.
Roos, P.
(1983). Marriage and women's occupational attainment in cross-cultural perspective. American Sociological Review, 48, 852-864.
24.
Ryder, N.
(1965). The cohort as a conception in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 583-609.
25.
Rytina, N.
, & Bianchi, S. (1984). Occupational reclassification and changes in distribution by gender. Monthly Labor Review, 107, 11-17.
26.
Shaw, L.
(1985). Determinants of the increasing work attachment of married women. Work and Occupations, 12, 41-57.
27.
Shaw, L.
, & Shapiro, D. (1987). Women's work plans: Contrasting expectations and actual work experience. Monthly Labor Review, 110, 7-13.
28.
Thomton, A.
, Alwin, D., & Camburn, D. (1983). Sex-role attitudes and attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48, 211-227.
29.
Waite, L. J.
(1980). Working wives and the family life cycle. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 272-294.
30.
Waldman, E.
, Grossman, A., Hayghe, H., & Johnson, B. (1979). Working mothers in the 1970's: A look at the statistics. Monthly Labor Review, 102, 39-49.
31.
Wolf, W.
, & Fligstein, N. (1979). Sex and authority in the workplace: The causes of sexual inequality. American Sociological Review, 44, 235-252.
