Although substantial effort has been directed at explaining patterns of unpaid household labor, relatively little is known about the effects of household work on employment and their interrelationship in determining paid income. This article applies multivariate analysis to data collected in Australia in 1984 and 1985 to examine the effects of employment on household work. The results show that women in the full-time work force are most affected by household labor, while it has a lesser impact on women in part-time employment; for the latter, household duties would appear to determine their labor market participation. Household labor has more consequences for the weekly earnings of women in full-time work than for those in part-time work, and it also has consequences for the weekly earnings of men. Finally, a decomposition of effects shows that household labor is comparable in importance to occupational characteristics in explaining income differentials between men and women in the full-time work force.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, S.
(1982). Gender inequality and class formation. In A. Giddens & G. Mackenzie (Eds.), Social class and the division of labour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Becker, G. S.
(1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Becker, G. S.
(1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(Supplement); S33-S58.
4.
Beer, W. R.
(1983). Househusbands: Men and housework in American families. New York: Praeger.
5.
Berk, R. A.
, & Berk, S. F. (1978). A simultaneous equation model of the division of household labor. Sociological Methods and Research, 6, 431-465.
6.
Berk, R. A.
, & Berk, S. F. (1979). Labor and leisure at home. Beverly Hills: Sage.
7.
Berk, R. A.
, & Berk, S. F. (1983). Supply-side sociology of the family: The challenge of the new home economics. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 375-395.
8.
Berk, S. F.
(1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
9.
Bibb, R.
, & Form, W. H. (1977). The effects of industrial, occupational, and sex stratification on wages in blue collar markets. Social Forces, 55, 975-976.
10.
Bielby, D. D.
, & Bielby W. T. (1988). She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work for effort. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1031-1059.
11.
Blau, P. M.
, & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.
12.
Broom, L.et al.
(1977). The inheritance of inequality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Cass, B.
(1978). Women's place in the class structure. In E. L. Wheelwright & K. D. Buckley (Eds.), Essays in the political economy of Australian capitalism, Vol. 3. Sydney: ANZ Books.
14.
Corcoran, M.
& Duncan, G. J. (1979). Work history, labor force attachment, and earnings differences between the races and sexes. Journal of Human Resources, 14, 3-20.
15.
Coverman, S.
(1983). Gender, domestic labor time, and wage inequality. American Sociological Review, 48, 623-637.
16.
Coverman, S.
(1985). Explaining husbands' participation in domestic labor. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 81-97.
17.
Edgar, D.
(1988). The family. In J. Najman & J. Western (Eds.), A sociology of Australian society. Melbourne: Macmillan.
18.
England, P.
& Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
Farkas, G.
(1976). Education, wage rates and the division of labor between husband and wife. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 473-483.
20.
Fox, K. D.
, & Nichols, S. (1983). The time crunch. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 61-82.
21.
Geerken, M.
, & Grove, W. R. (1983). At home and at work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Glazer, N.
(1980). Everyone needs three hands: Doing unpaid and paid work. In S. F. Berk (Ed.), Women and household labor. Beverly Hills, CA. Sage.
23.
Hanushek, E. A.
, & Jackson, J. A. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Hertel, B. R.
(1976). Minimizing error variance introduced by missing data routines in survey analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 4, 169-184.
25.
Huber, J.
, & Spitze, G. (1983). Sex stratification: Children, housework, and jobs. New York: Academic Press.
26.
Jones, F. L.
(1983). Source of gender inequality in income: What the Australian census says. Social Forces, 62, 134-152.
27.
Jones, F. L.
(1984). Income inequality. In D. H. Broom (Ed.), Unfinished business. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
28.
Kelley, J.
, Cushing R., & Headey, B. (1987). National social science survey codebook. Canberra: Social Science Data Archives.
29.
Kuhn, A.
, & Wolpe, A. M. (Eds.). (1978). Feminism and materialism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30.
Pahl, R. E.
(1984). Divisions of labour. Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Roos, P.
(1981). Sexual stratification in the workplace: Male-female differences in economic returns to occupation. Social Science Research, 10, 195-224.
32.
Schooler, C.et al.
(1984). Work for the household: Its nature and consequences for husbands and wives. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 97-124.
33.
Spitze, G.
(1986). The division of task responsibility in U.S. households: Longitudinal adjustments to change. Social Forces, 65, 689-671.
34.
Stafford, R.
, Backman, E., & Dubona, P. (1977). The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 43-54.
35.
Treiman, D. J.
, & Terrell, K. (1975). Sex and the process of status attainment: A comparison of working men and women. American Sociological Review, 40, 174-200.
36.
Vanek, J.
(1974). Time spent in housework. Scientific American, 231, 116-120.
37.
Western, J. S.
(1984). Social inequality in Australian society. Melbourne: Macmillan.
38.
Yeatman, A.
(1986). Women, domestic life, and sociology. In C. Pateman & E. Gross (Eds.), Feminist challenges: Social and political theory. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
