Sex desegregation in over 100 managerial and professional specialty occupations were examined during the periods 1950-1960, 1960-1970, and 1970-1980. Three patterns of desegregation were theoretically derived and empirical support for each of them was found: female entry into male fields, male entry into female occupations, and the gender-switching process in which a field is left by men and entered by women. Rapid growth was found to be associated with the first two patterns, and declines in occupational size with the last. Findings indicated that desegregation is both widespread and increasing in higher status fields. Nevertheless, desegregation rates are higher in occupations which pay men less and which are declining in size. The highest-paying fields continue to be more resistant to sex desegregation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beller, A. H.
(1984) Trends in occupational segregation by sex and race, 1960-1981. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 11-26). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
Beller, A. H.
(1985). Changes in the sex composition of U.S. occupations, 1960-1981. Journal of Human Resources, 20, 235-250.
3.
Bergmann, B.
(1971). The effect on white incomes of discrimination in employment. Journal of Political Economy, 79, 294-313.
4.
Bergmann, B.
(1974). Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by race or sex. Eastern Economic Journal, 1, 103-110.
5.
Bibb, R.
& Form, W. H. (1977). The effects of industrial, occupational, and sex stratification on wages in blue-collar markets. Social Forces, 55, 974-996.
6.
Blau, F. D.
, & Hendricks, W. E. (1979). Occupational segregation by sex: Trends and prospects. Journal of Human Resources, 14, 197-210.
7.
Blau, P. M.
, & Duncan, O. D. (1978). The American occupational structure. New York: Free Press.
8.
Butz, W. P.
, & Ward, M. P. (1979). Will U.S. fertility remain low? A new economic interpretation. Population and Development Review, 5, 663-688.
9.
Carter, M. J.
, & Carter, S. B. (1981). Women's recent progress in the professions or women get a ticket to ride after the gravy train has left the station. Feminist Studies, 7(3), 476-504.
10.
Chartos, C. H.
, Haignore, L., & Steinberg, R. J. (1982). Occupational segregation and its impact on working women. Report of the Conference of the Ford Foundation, 1982. Albany: State University of New York, Center for Women in Government.
11.
England, P.
, Chessie, M., & McCormack, L. (1982). Skills demands and earnings in female and male occupations. Sociology and Social Research, 66, 147-168.
12.
England, P.
, & Farkas, G. (1986) Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic and demographic view. New York: Aldine.
13.
Fuchs, V. R.
(1975). A note on sex segregation in professional occupations. Explorations in Economic Research, 2, 105-111.
Grimm, J. W.
(1978). Women in female-dominated professions. In A. Stromberg & S. Harkess (Eds.), Women working: Theories and facts in perspective (pp. 105-136). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
16.
Grimm, J. W.
, & Stern, R. N. (1974). Sex roles and internal labor market structures: the “female” semi-professions. Social Problems, 21, 690-705.
17.
Gross, E.
(1968). Plus ca change...? The sexual structure of occupations over time. Social Problems, 16(2), 198-208.
18.
Hauser, R. M.
, Dickinson, P. J., Travis, H. P., & Koffel, J. W. (1975). Structural changes in occupational mobility among men in the United States. American Sociological Review, 40, 585-598.
19.
Heistand, J. F.
(1964). Economic growth and employment opportunities for minorities. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
Jacobs, J. A.
(1985). Sex segregation in American higher education. In L. Larwood, A. H. Stromberg, & B. A. Guteck (Eds.), Women and Work: An annual review (pp. 191-214). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Kronus, C.
(1975). Occupational values, role orientations and work settings: The case of pharmacy. Sociological Quarterly, 16, 173-183.
22.
Lorence, J.
(1987). Gender differences in occupational labor market structure. Work and Occupations, 14, 23-61.
23.
Mellor, E. F.
(1985). Weekly earnings in 1983. Monthly Labor Review, 108, 54-59.
24.
O'Neill, J.
(1985). The trend in the male female wage gap in the United States. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 591-616.
25.
Reskin, B. F.
, & Phipps, P. A. (1988). Women in male-dominated occupations. In A. Stromberg & S. Harkess (Eds.), Women working: Theories and facts in perspective (2nd ed.) (pp. 190-205). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
26.
Ritzer, G.
, & Walczak, D. (1986). Working: Conflict and change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
Rothman, R. A.
(1987). Working: Sociological perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
Rytina, N. F.
(1982). Earnings of men and women: A look at specific occupations. Monthly Labor Review, 105, 25-31.
29.
Rytina, N. F.
, & Bianchi, S. M. (1984). Occupational reclassification and changes in distribution by gender. Monthly Labor Review, 107, 11-17.
30.
Smith, J. P.
, & Ward, M. P. (1984). Women's wages and work in the twentieth century. Report No. R-3119-NICHD. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31.
Snyder, D.
, Hayward, M.D., & Hudis, P.M. (1978). The location of change in the sexual structure of occupations, 1950-1960: Insights from labor market segmentation theory. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3), 706-717.
32.
Strober, M. H.
(1984). Toward a general theory of occupational sex segregation: The case of public school teaching. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 144-156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1950). United States census of the population: 1950. Vol. 4, Special Reports: Occupational characteristics (Pt. 1, Chapter 8). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1960). United States census of the population: 1960. Subject Reports: Occupational characteristic. Final Report PC(2)-7A. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1970). Census of population: 1970. Classified index of industries and occupations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1970). United States census of the population: 1970. Subject Reports: Occupational characteristics. Final Report PC(2)-7A. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1980). Census of Population: 1980. Classified index of industries and occupations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1980). United States census of the population: 1980. Vol. 2, Subject Reports: Earnings by occupation and education. Final Report PC 80-2-8B. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
. (1981). Population profile of the United States: 1980. Current Population Reports. P-20, No. 363, Table 21. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40.
Van Fossen, B. E.
(1979). The structure of social inequality. Boston: Little, Brown.
