Existing theories of the effects of relative numbers, and especially tokenism, on worker behaviors and attitudes are reviewed. Despite the absence of specific reference in the literature to worker alienation as an outcome of token status, an argument is presented drawing upon this research tradition and discussions of marginality to link this dependent variable to tokenism. In addition, often neglected status considerations are included to predict directionality in that linkage. Findings suggest that relative numbers play a minimal role in worker alienation. Some limited support for the relevance of status concerns is found, but only in sex tokenism. Absolute size appears to have negligible effects. It is suggested that theories of tokenism may need to define more narrowly the occupations to which they apply and also delineate other, more social psychological variables that may intervene between numbers and attitudes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAYES, M.
and P. NEWTON (1978) “Women in authority: a sociopsychological analysis.”J. of Applied Behavioral Sci.14: 7-25.
2.
BLALOCK, H. M., Jr.
(1967) Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. New York: John Wiley.
3.
BLAU, P. M.
(1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
4.
BLAUNER, R.
(1964) Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
5.
BRIDGE, G.
(1974) Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys: The Case of the Department of Defense Post-Service Survey. Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, ARPA, R-1501.
6.
CARAM, D. F. (1982) “An analysis of factors associated with job dissatisfaction and quitting behavior among urban public school teachers.” Ed.D. dissertation, University of Houston.
7.
CLEMENT, D. C.
, M. EISENHART, and J. R. HARDING (1979) “The veneer of harmony: social-race relations in a southern desegregated school.” pp. 15-64 in R. C. Rist (ed.) Desegregated Schools: Appraisals of an American Experience. New York: Academic Press.
8.
CORWIN, R. G.
(1970) Militant Professionalism: A Study of Organizational Conflicts in a High School. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9.
COUGHLIN, R. J.
(1970) “Dimensions of teacher morale.”Amer. Educ. Research J.7: 221-233.
10.
DONNENWORTH, G.
and H. G. COX (1978) “Attitudinal militancy among teachers.”Soc. Q.19 (Summer): 459-468.
11.
DWORKIN, A. G.
(1974) Balance on the Bayou: The Impact of Racial Isolation and Stereotype in the Houston Schools. Houston: Houston Council on Human Relations.
12.
DWORKIN, A. G.
(1980) “The changing demography of public school teachers: some implications for faculty turnover in urban areas.”Sociology of Education53 (April): 65-73.
13.
DWORKIN, A. G.
(1986) Teacher Burnout in the Public Schools: Structural Causes and Consequences for Children. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
14.
DWORKIN, A. G.J. M. SANDERS
, and F. BLACK (1978) “The Singleton Ratio: the impact of faculty desegregation upon faculty alienation in an urban public school district.” Presented at the meetings of the Southwestern Sociological Association, Houston, TX.
15.
EPSTEIN, C. F.
(1970) Women's Place: Options and Limits on Professional Careers. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
16.
FALK, W. W.
, M. D. GRIMES, and G. F. LORD III (1982) “Professionalism and conflict in a bureaucratic setting: the case of a teachers' strike.”Social Problems29 (June): 551-560.
17.
FOX, W. S.
and M. H. WINCE (1976) “Structure and determinants of occupational militancy among public school teachers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Rev.30: 47-58.
18.
FRAZIER, N.
and M. SADKER (1973) Sexism in School and Society. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
GIST, N. P.
and A. G. DWORKIN (1972) The Blending of Races: Marginality and Identity in World Perspective. New York: Wiley Interscience.
20.
GREENBLATT, S. L.
and C. V. WILLIE (1980) “The serendipitous effects of school desegregation,” pp. 51-66 in W. G. Stephan and J. R. Feagin (eds.) School Desegregation: Past, Present, and Future. New York: Plenum.
21.
GRIER, W.
and P. COBBS (1968) Black Rage. New York: Basic Books.
22.
HOLIAN, J., Jr.
(1972) “Alienation and social awareness among students.”Soc. Q.13: 114-125.
23.
HURN, C. J.
(1978) The Limits and Possibilities of Schooling. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
IZRAEL, D. N.
(1983) Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter's theory of proportions. Social Forces62 (September): 153-165.
25.
JACKSON, P. W.
(1968) Life in Classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
KANTER, R. M.
(1977a) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
27.
KANTER, R. M.
(1977b) “Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women.”Amer. J. of Sociology82: 965-990.
28.
LAWS, J. L.
(1975) “The psychology of tokenism: an analysis.”Sex Roles1: 51-67.
29.
LORTIE, D. C.
(1975) Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
30.
MACKE, A. S.
(1981) “Token men and women: a note on the salience of sex and occupation among professionals and semiprofessionals.”Sociology of Work and Occupations8 (February): 25-38.
31.
MOBLEY, W. H.
, R. W. GRIFFETH, H. H. HAND, and B. M. MEGLINO (1979) “Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process.”Psych. Bull.86: 493-522.
32.
MOTTAZ, C. J.
(1981) “Some determinants of work alienation.”Soc. Q.22 (Autumn): 515-529.
33.
National Education Association
(1972) “The American public school teacher.”NEA Research Bull.50: 3-8.
34.
National Institute of Education
(1976) The Desegregation Literature: A Critical Appraisal. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
35.
NIE, N. C.
, H. HULL, K. STEINBRENNER, and D. BENT (1975) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
NOBLIT, G. W.
(1979) “Practice and patience in a Southern high school: managing the political economy of desegregated education,” pp. 65-88 in R. Rist (ed.) Desegregated Schools: Appraisals of an American Experiment. New York: Academic Press.
37.
PARK, R. E.
(1928) “Human migration and the marginal man.”Amer. J. of Sociology33 (May): 881-893.
38.
RIDGEWAY, C. L.
(1982a) The Dynamics of Small Groups. New York. St. Martin's.
39.
RIDGEWAY, C. L.
(1982b) “Status in groups: the importance of motivation.”Amer. Soc. Rev.47 (February): 76-88.
40.
RIDGEWAY, C.
and C. JACOBSEN (1977) “Sources of status and influence in all-female and mixed sex groups.”Soc. Q.18 (Summer): 413-425.
41.
RITZER, G.
and H. TRICE (1969) “An empirical study of Howard Becker's sidebet theory.”Social Forces47: 475-478.
42.
SEEMAN, M.
(1959) “On the meaning of alienation.”Amer. Soc. Rev.24: 783-791.
43.
SEEMAN, M.
(1979) “Alienation studies.”Annual Rev. of Sociology1: 91-123.
44.
SEGAL, B.
(1962) “Male nurses: a case study of status contradiction and prestige loss.”Social Forces41 (October): 31-38.
45.
SEIFERT, K.
(1973) “Some problems of men in child care center work,” pp. 69-73 in J. Pleck and J. Sawyer (eds.) Men and Masculinity. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
46.
SHEPARD, J. M.
(1972) “Alienation as a process: work as a case in point.”Soc. Q.13: 161-173.
47.
SHOEMAKER, D. J.
, W. E. SNIZEK, and C. D. BRYANT (1977) “Toward a further clarification of Becker's side-bet hypothesis applied to organizational and occupational commitment.”Social Forces56: 598-603.
48.
SIMMEL, G.
(1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Kurt H. Wolff, trans.). New York: Free Press.
49.
SOUTH, S.
, C. BONJEAN, W. MARKHAM, and J. CORDER-BOLZ (1982) “Social structure and intergroup interaction: men and women of the federal bureaucracy.”Amer. Soc. Rev.47: 587-599.
50.
SPANGLER, E.
, M. GORDON, and R. PIPKIN (1978) “Token woman: an empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis.”Amer. J. of Sociology84: 160-170.
51.
STANDLEY, R.
and B. SOULE (1974) “Women in male-dominated professions: contrasts in their personal and vocational histories.”J. of Vocational Behavior4: 245-258.
52.
STEPHAN, W. G.
and J. R. FEAGIN [eds.] (1980) School Desegregation: Past, Present, and Future. New York: Plenum.
53.
STEVENS, J. H.
, J. M. BEYER, and H. M. TRICE (1978) “Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment.”Academy of Management J.21: 380-396.
54.
STONEQUIST, E. V.
(1937) The Marginal Man: A Study in Personality and Culture Conflict. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
55.
TELSCHOW, R. R. (1982) “Technical report on the active state of stress among teachers in the Houston Independent School District.” M.A. Thesis, University of Houston.
56.
WILSON, S.
(1978) Informal Groups. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57.
WOLMAN, C.
and H. FRANK (1975) “The solo woman in a professional peer group.”Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry45 (January): 164-171.
58.
YOUNG, C. J.
, D. L. MacKENZIE, and C. W. SHERIFF (1980) “In search of token women in academia.”Psychology of Women Q.4 (Summer): 508-525.
