Following a symbolic interactionist framework, a study of Chicago-area women aged 25 to 54 focused on their constructed reality including definitions of the complexity of their job. Women in even low status and task complexity occupations, as measured by Duncan and DOT scales, found some dimensions of their jobs “above average”—such as independence, responsibility, opportunities to see the product of the work, and opportunities for self-development—and were pleased by this level of perceived job complexity. There are women who feel their jobs are below average along these dimensions and are pleased with this situation, but there are fewer of them than the stereotypes of female workers predict. Women appear to judge their jobs from a social role rather a task perspective, which probably accounts for the relatively low fit between their evaluations of job complexity and the Duncan socioeconomic index or The Dictionary of Occupational Titles' complexity scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDRISANI, P. J.
(1978) “Job satisfaction among working women.”SIGNS3: 588-607.
2.
BECK, E. M.
, P. M. HORAN, and C. M. TOLBERT II (1978) “Stratification in a dual economy: a sectoral model of earnings differentiation.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 704-720.
3.
BERGER, P.
and T. LUCKMANN (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4.
BLAUNER, R.
(1964) Alienation and Freedom. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
5.
BONJEAN, C. M.
and M. D. GRIMES (1970) “Bureaucracy and alienation: a dimensional approach.”Social Forces48: 365-373.
6.
BRAVERMAN, H.
(1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
7.
CAPLOW, T.
(1954) The Sociology of Work. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
8.
CHINOY, E.
(1955) Automobile Workers and the American Dream. Boston: Beacon Press.
9.
COSER, R.
(1975) “The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy,” in L. Coser (ed.) The Idea of Social Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
10.
DAVIDSON, L.
and L. K. GORDON (1979) The Sociology of Gender. Chicago: Rand McNally.
11.
DAVIS, A.
, B. B. GARDNER, and M. R. GARDNER (1941) Deep South. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
12.
DUNCAN, O. D.
(1961) “A socioeconomic index for all occupations,” pp. 109-138 in A. J. Reisset al. (eds.) Occupations and Social Status. New York: Free Press.
13.
ETZIONI, A.
(1969) The Semi-Professions and Their Organization. New York: Free Press.
14.
FORM, W.
(1980) “Resolving ideological issues on the division of labor,” pp. 140-155 in Sociological Theory and Research: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Free Press.
15.
GARSON, B.
(1975) All the Livelong Day: The Meaning and Demeaning of Routine Work. New York: Doubleday.
16.
GILBRETH, L.
(1914) The Psychology of Management. New York: Free Press.
17.
GOODE, W.
(1964) World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press.
18.
GOULDNER, A. W.
(1957) “Cosmopolitans and Locals.”Admin. Sci. Q. (December): 281-306. (Also published in March, 1958: 444-480.)
19.
GRUENBERG, B.
(1980) “The happy worker: an analysis of educational and occupational differences in determinants of job satisfaction.”Amer. J. of Sociology86: 247-271.
20.
HALL, R.
(1975) Occupations and Social Structure. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
HODGE, R. W.
, P. M. SIEGAL, and P. H. ROSSI (1966) “Occupational prestige in the United States: 1925-1963,” pp. 322-334 in R. Bendix and S. M. Lipset (eds.) Class Status and Power. New York: Free Press.
22.
HORNER, M. S.
(1972) “Towards an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women.”J. of Social Issues28: 157-176.
23.
HOWE, L. K.
(1977) Pink Collar Workers: Inside the World of Women's Work. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
24.
ISRAEL, J.
(1971) Alienation: From Marx to Modern Sociology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
KANTER, R. M.
(1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
26.
KOHN, M. L.
(1976) “Occupational structure and alienation.”Amer. J. of Sociology82: 111-130.
27.
KOHN, M. L.
and C. SCHOOLER (1978) “The reciprocal effects of substantive complexity of work and intellectual flexibility: a longitudinal assessment.”Amer. J. of Sociology84: 24-52.
28.
KOHN, M. L.
and C. SCHOOLER(1973a) “Occupational experience and psychological functioning: an assessment of reciprocal effects.”Amer. Soc. Rev.38: 97-113.
29.
KOHN, M. L.
and C. SCHOOLER(1973b) “Indeces of occupational self-direction developed in the Schooler study of occupational conditions and psychological functioning.” (mimeo)
30.
LAWS, J. L.
(1976) “Work aspirations of women: false leads and new starts.”SIGNS1: 33-49.
31.
LAWS, J. L.
(1979) The Second X. New York: Elsevier.
32.
LAUMANN, E. O.
and R. SENTER (1976) “Subjective social distance, occupational stratification, and forms of status and class consciousness: a cross-national replication and extension.”Amer. J. of Sociology81: 1304-1338.
33.
LOPATA, H. Z.
(1971) Occupation: Housewife. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
34.
LOPATA, H. Z.
(1969) “Social psychological aspects of role involvement.”Sociology and Social Research53: 285-298.
35.
LOPATA, H. Z.
(1964) “A restatement of the relations between role and status.”Sociology and Social Research49: 58-68.
36.
LOPATA, H. Z.
and K. NORR (1980) “Changing commitments of women to work and family roles and their future consequences for Social Security.”Social Security Bulletin43: 3-14.
37.
LOPATA, H. Z.
and K. NORR(1979) “Changing commitments of women to work and family roles and their future consequences for Social Security.” Final report to the Social Security Administration.
38.
MANNHEIM, K.
(1936) Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
39.
MARCUSE, H.
(1964) One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
40.
MARGLIN, S. A.
(1974) “What do bosses do? The origins of hierarchy in capitalist production.”Rev. of Radical Pol. Econ.4: 60-112.
41.
McLAUGHLIN, S.
(1978) “Occupational sex identification and the assessment of male-female earnings inequality.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 909-921.
42.
MERTON, R.
(1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Scott, Foresman.
43.
MILLER, C.
, H. Z. LOPATA, and K. NORR (1980) “Continuous versus discontinuous schooling: women in their middle years.” Presented at the annual Midwest Sociological Society Meetings, Milwaukee.
44.
MILLER, J.
, C. SCHOOLER, M. L. KOHN, and K. A. MILLER (1979) “Women and work: the psychological effects of occupational conditions.”Amer. J. of Sociology85: 66-94.
45.
NORR, K.
, C. MILLER, and H. LOPATA (1979) “Changing involvements in employment and family roles among Chicago-area women: new ways of moving through the life course.” Presented at the annual Midwest Sociological Society Meetings, Minneapolis.
46.
OPPENHEIMER, V. K.
(1970) The Female Labor Force in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
47.
PEARLIN, L.
(1962) “Alienation from work: a study of nursing personnel.”Amer. Soc. Rev.28: 314-326.
48.
PERINBANAYAGAM, R. S.
(1974) “The definition of the situation: an analysis of the ethnomethodological and dramaturgical view.”Soc. Q. 15: 521-541.
49.
QUINN, R. P.
and L. J. SHEPARD (1974) The 1972-1973 Quality of Employment Survey. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center.
50.
QUINN, R. P.
, G. L. STAINES, and M. R. McCULLOUGH (1974) Job Satisfaction: Is There a Trend?Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
51.
REISS, A. J., Jr.
(1961) Occupations and Social Status. New York: Free Press.
52.
RITZER, G.
(1977) Working: conflict and change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
53.
ROBINSON, J. P.
, R. ATHANASIOU, and K. HEAD (1969) Measures of Occupational Attitudes and Occupational Characteristics. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
54.
ROETHLISBERGER, F. J.
and W. J. DICKSON (1964) Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
55.
SCHUTZ, A.
(1967) The Phenomonology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
56.
SEEMAN, M.
(1959) “On the meaning of alienation.”Amer. Soc. Rev.24: 738-791.
57.
Special Task Force to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
(1973) Work in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
SPRADLEY, J. P.
and B. J. MANN (1975) The Cocktail Waitress: Woman's Work in a Man's World. New York: John Wiley.
59.
STEBBINS, R.
(1978) “Studying the definition of the situation: theory and field research strategies,” pp. 258-271 in J. G. Manis and B. N. Meltzer (eds.) Symbolic Interaction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
60.
STONE, G.
and H. FABERMAN [eds.] (1970) Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction. Lexington, MA: Xerox College.
61.
SUELZLE, M.
(1973) “Women in labor,” pp. 325-334 in H. Z. Lopata (ed.) Marriages and Families. New York: D. Van Nostrand.
62.
TAYLOR, F. W.
(1947) Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Row.
63.
TERKEL, S.
(1974) Working. New York: Pantheon.
64.
THOMAS, W. I.
(1931) The Unadjusted Girl. Boston: Little, Brown.
65.
TREIMAN, D. J.
(1977) Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
66.
TRESEMER, D.
(1976) “Do women fear success?”SIGNS1: 863-874.
67.
U.S. Department of Labor
(1965) Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Volume II Occupational Classification. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
68.
WALKER, C. R.
and R. GUEST (1952) Man on the Assembly Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
69.
WARSHAY, L.
(1962) “Breadth of perspectives,” pp. 148-176 in A. Rose (ed.) Human Behavior and Social Processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
70.
WHYTE, W. F.
(1949) “The social structure of the restaurant.”Amer. J. of Sociology54(4): 302-310.
71.
WITT, M.
and P. K. NAHERNY (1975) Women's Work. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Extension.
72.
ZNANIECKI, F.
(1965) Social Relations and Social Roles. San Francisco: Chandler.
