Utilizing a field experiment design, this article examines whether discrimination based on any combination of job applicant gender and recruiter gender occurs in the first stage of the recruitment process, that is, selecting applicants to be contacted. This study includes 1,643 job applications in the Swedish labor market. Overall, based on the callbacks received, male recruiters, unlike female recruiters, are found to contact male applicants more often than female applicants. The results show a pro-male bias by male recruiters in gender-mixed occupations, whereas no significant gender differences in callbacks by recruiter gender are found in male- and female-dominated occupations.
AhmedA.AnderssonL.HammarstedtM. (2013).
Are gay men and lesbians discriminated against in the hiring process?Southern Economic Journal,
79(3), 565–585.
2.
AllasinoE.ReyneriE.VenturiniA.ZinconeG. (2004). Labour Market Discrimination against Migrant Workers in Italy (International Migrations Papers 67).
Geneva, Switzerland:
International Labour Office.
3.
AraiM.BursellM.NekbyL. (2016).
The reverse gender gap in ethnic discrimination: Employer stereotypes of men and women with Arabic names. International Migration Review,
50(2), 385–412.
4.
ArrowK. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In AshenfelterO.ReesA. (Eds.), Discrimination in labor markets (pp. 3–42).
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
5.
AttströmK. (2007). Discrimination against native Swedes of immigrant origin in access to employment (International Migrations Papers 86E).
Geneva, Switzerland:
International Labour Office.
6.
BaertS. (2018). Hiring discrimination: An overview of (almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005. In GaddisS. M. (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 63–77).
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer.
7.
BaguesM. F.Esteve-VolartB. (2010).
Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. The Review of Economic Studies,
77(4), 1301–1328.
8.
BartošV.BauerM.ChytilováJ.MatějkaF. (2016).
Attention discrimination: Theory and field experiments with monitoring information acquisition. American Economic Review,
106(6), 1437–1475.
9.
BeckerG. (1971). The economics of discrimination.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
10.
BoothA.LeighA. (2010).
Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations. Economics Letters,
107(2), 236–238.
11.
BrandtM. J. (2011).
Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science,
22(11), 1413–1418.
12.
BrewerM. B.KramerR. M. (1985).
The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology,
36(1), 219–243.
13.
BudigM. J.HodgesM. J. (2010).
Differences in disadvantage variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review,
75(5), 705–728.
14.
BursellM. (2014).
The multiple burdens of foreign-named men—Evidence from a field experiment on gendered ethnic hiring discrimination in Sweden. European Sociological Review,
30(3), 399–409.
15.
BygrenM.GählerM. (2012).
Family formation and men’s and women’s attainment of workplace authority. Social Forces,
90(3), 795–816.
16.
BygrenM.ErlandssonA.GählerM. (2017).
Do employers prefer fathers? Evidence from a field experiment testing the gender by parenthood interaction effect on callbacks to job applications. European Sociological Review,
33(3), 337–348.
17.
CarlssonM. (2011).
Does hiring discrimination cause gender segregation in the Swedish labor market?Feminist Economics,
17(3), 71–102.
18.
CedieyE.ForoniF. (2008). Discrimination in access to employment on grounds of foreign origin in France (International Migration Papers 85E).
Geneva, Switzerland:
International Labour Office.
19.
CejkaM. A.EaglyA. H. (1999).
Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
25(4), 413–422.
20.
CharlesM. (2011).
A world of difference: International trends in women’s economic status. Annual Review of Sociology,
37, 355–371.
21.
CorrellS. J.BenardS.PaikI. (2007).
Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology,
112(5), 1297–1338.
22.
FirthM. (1981).
Racial discrimination in the British labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,
34(2), 265–272.
23.
GaddisS. M. (2018). An introduction to audit studies in the social sciences. In GaddisS. M. (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 3–44).
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer.
24.
GanglM.ZiefleA. (2009).
Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography,
46(2), 341–369.
25.
GoldinC.RouseC. (2000).
Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review,
90(4), 715–741.
26.
GuryanJ.CharlesK. K. (2013).
Taste‐based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination returns to its roots. The Economic Journal,
123, F417–F432.
27.
HeckmanJ. (1998).
Detecting discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
12(2), 101–116.
28.
HeckmanJ.SiegelmanP. (1993). The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In FixM.StruykR. J. (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America (pp. 187–258).
Washington, DC:
The Urban Institute Press.
29.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world.
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
30.
KandelD. B. (1978).
Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology,
84(2), 427–436.
31.
KennerbergL. (2007). Hur förändras kvinnors och mäns arbetssituation när de får barn? [How does women’s and men’s work situation change when they have children?]
(IFAU Rapport 2007:9). Uppsala, Sweden: Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala University.
32.
LaheyJ. N. (2008).
Age, women, and hiring: An experimental study. Journal of Human Resources,
43(1), 30–56.
33.
LaheyJ. N.BeasleyR. A. (2009).
Computerizing audit studies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
70, 508–514.
34.
LaheyJ. N.BeasleyR. A. (2018). Technical aspects of correspondence studies. In GaddisS. M. (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 81–101).
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer.
35.
LevinsonR. (1975).
Sex discrimination and employment practices: An experiment with unconventional job inquiries. Social Problems,
22, 533–543.
36.
MandelH.SemyonovM. (2006).
A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology,
111, 1910–1949.
37.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001).
Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology,
27(1), 415–444.
38.
NeumarkD. (2018).
Experimental research on labor market discrimination, Journal of Economic Literature,
56, 799–866.
39.
NeumarkD.BankR. J.Van NortK. D. (1996).
Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
111(3), 915–941.
40.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). OECD employment outlook 2017.
Paris, France:
OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-en
41.
PagerD.QuillianL. (2005).
Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review,
70, 355–380.
42.
PetersenT.TogstadT. (2006).
Getting the offer: Sex discrimination in hiring. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,
24(3), 239–257.
43.
PetitP. (2007).
The effects of age and family constraints on gender hiring discrimination: A field experiment in the French financial sector. Labour Economics,
14(3), 371–391.
44.
PhelpsE. S. (1972).
The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review,
62(4), 659–661.
45.
RiachP. A.RichJ. (2002).
Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The Economic Journal,
112, 480–518.
46.
RiachP. A.RichJ. (2006).
An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labor market. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy,
5(2), 1–20.
47.
RiveraL. A.TilcsikA. (2016).
Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review,
81(6), 1097–1131.
VuoloM.UggenC.LagesonS. (2018). To match or not to match? Statistical and substantive considerations in audit design and analysis. In GaddisS. M. (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 119–140).
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer.
55.
WeichselbaumerD. (2004).
Is it sex or personality? The impact of sex stereotypes on discrimination in applicant selection. Eastern Economic Journal,
30(2), 159–186.
