How do contract professionals seek to control their working time? Here, the authors identify boundary work strategies through which contractors—both shift workers and project workers—maintain distinctions from employees with standard jobs. Drawing from interviews with contractors in three occupations, the authors identify sources of leverage for control of working time in payment systems, outsider status, and occupational networks. These structures allow contractors to reinforce boundaries between contract and standard employment and resist the overtime and overwork associated with standard jobs. Boundary work between contingent workers and employees may therefore generate inequalities of control, with implications for workers, managers, and organizations.
AllenD. (2001) Doing occupational demarcation: The “boundary-work” of nurse managers in a district general hospital. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography29(3): 326–356.
AlonzoA. A.SimonA. B. (2008) Have stethoscope, will travel: Contingent employment among physician heath care providers in the United States. Work, Employment & Society22: 635–654.
4.
ArthurM. B. (2008) Examining contemporary careers: A call for interdisciplinary inquiry. Human Relations61(2): 163–186.
5.
ArthurM. B.RousseauD. M. (1996) The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000) All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review25(3): 472–481.
7.
BailynL. (1993) Breaking the mold: Women, men, and time in the new corporate world, New York, NY: The Free Press.
8.
BanerjeeM.TolbertP. S.DiCiccioT. (2012) Friend or foe? The effects of contingent employees on standard employees’ work attitudes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management23(11): 2180–2204.
9.
BarleyS. R.KundaG. (2004) Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in a knowledge economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BassoP. (2003) Modern times/ancient hours: Working lives in the twenty-first century, London, England: Verso.
11.
BattR.ChristopheresonS.RightorN.van JaarsveldD. (2000) Net working: Work patterns and workforce policies for the new media industry, Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
12.
BenyonH.GrimshawD.RuberyJ.WardK. (2002) Managing employment change, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
BernhardtA. D.MorrisM.HandcockM. S.ScottM. A. (2001) Divergent paths: Economic mobility in the new American labor market, New York, NY: Russell Sage.
14.
BidwellM. (2009) Do peripheral workers do peripheral work? Comparing the use of highly skilled contractors and regular employees. Industrial & Labor Relations Review62(4): 200–225.
15.
BriscoeJ. P.HallD. T. (2006) The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior69(1): 4–18.
16.
BriscoeF.WardellM.SawyerS. (2011) Membership has its privileges? Contracting and access to jobs that accommodate work-life needs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review64(2): 258–282.
17.
BrooksR. A. (2011) Cheaper by the hour: Temporary lawyers and the deprofessionalization of the law, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
BroschakJ. P.Davis-BlakeA. (2006) Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements. Academy of Management Journal48(2): 317–393.
19.
BrownM. (2009) The cultural work of corporations, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
CadyR. F. (2008) Refusal to care. JONA’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation10(2): 46–47.
21.
CappelliP.BassiL.KatzH.KnokeD.OstermanP.UseemM. (1997) Change at work, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
ChattopadhyayP.GeorgeE. (2001) Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology86(4): 781–788.
23.
ChenC.-A.BrudneyJ. L. (2009) A cross-sector comparison of using nonstandard workers: Explaining use and impacts on the employment relationship. Administration and Society41(3): 313–339.
24.
ChristophersonS. (2002) Project work in context: Regulatory change and the new geography of media. Environment and Planning A34(11): 2003–2015.
25.
ClawsonD.GerstelN. (2014) Unequal time: Gender, class, and family in employment schedules, New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.
ConnellyC. E.GallagherD. G. (2006) Independent and dependent contracting, meaning and implications. Human Resource Management Review16(2): 95–106.
28.
CrowleyM.HodsonR. (2014) Neoliberalism at work. Social Currents1(1): 91–108.
29.
CrowleyM.TopeD.ChamberlainL. J.HodsonR. (2010) Neo-Taylorism at work: Occupational change in the post-Fordist era. Social Problems57(3): 421–447.
30.
DavidJ. (2005) The unexpected employee and organizational costs of skilled contingent workers. Human Resource Planning28(2): 32–40.
31.
Davis-BlakeA.BroschakJ.GeorgeE. (2003) Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal46(4): 475–485.
32.
de CuyperN.SoraB.de WitteH.CaballerA.PeiroJ. M. (2009) Organizations’ use of temporary employment and a climate of job insecurity among Belgian and Spanish permanent workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy30(4): 564–591.
33.
DiTomasoN. (2001) The loose doupling of jobs: The subcontracting of everyone. In: BergI.ArneL.Kalleberg (eds) Sourcebook of labor markets: Evolving structures and processes, New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 247–270.
34.
EvansJ. A.KundaG.BarleyS. R. (2004) Beach time, bridge time, and billable hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly49(1): 1–38.
35.
Fernandez-MateoI. (2007) Who pays the price of brokerage? Transferring constraint through price setting in the staffing sector. American Sociological Review72(2): 291–317.
36.
FraserJ. A. (2001) White collar sweatshop: The deterioration of work and its rewards in corporate America, New York, NY: Norton.
37.
FraserJ.GoldM. (2001) “Portfolio workers”: Autonomy and control amongst freelance translators. Work, Employment & Society15(4): 679–697.
38.
FriedM. (1998) Taking time: Parental leave policy and corporate culture, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
39.
GarrettC. (2008) The effect of nurse staffing patterns on medical errors and nurse burnout. AORN Journal87(6): 1191–1204.
40.
GarstenC. (2003) Colleague, competitor, or client: Social boundaries in flexible work arrangements. In: PaulsenN.HernesT. (eds) Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives, New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 244–261.
41.
GearyJ. F. (1992) Employment flexibility and human resource management: The case of three American electronics plants. Work, Employment, and Society6(2): 251–270.
42.
GeorgeE. (2003) External solutions and internal problems: The effects of employment externalization on internal workers’ attitudes. Organization Science14(4): 386–402.
43.
GiddensA. (1984) The constitution of society, Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
44.
GierynT. (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
45.
GoldenL. (2005) Mandatory overtime work in the United States: Who, where, and what?Labor Studies Journal39(1): 1–26.
46.
GoldenL. (2006) How long? The historical, economic and cultural factors behind working hours and overwork. In: BurkeR. J. (ed.) Research companion to working time and work addiction, Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar, pp. 36–57.
47.
GonosG. (2001) “Never a fee!”: The miracle of the postmodern temporary help and staffing agency. Working USA4(3): 9–36.
48.
GoodinR. E.RiceJ. M.ParpoA.ErikssonL. (2008) Discretionary time: A new measure of freedom, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49.
GordonS. (2005) Nursing against the odds: How health care cost cutting, media stereotypes, and medical hubris undermine nurses and patient care, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50.
GordonS.BuchananJ.BrethertonT. (2008) Safety in numbers: Nurse-to-patient ratios and the future of health care, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
GreenF. (2006) Demanding work: The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
GrimshawD.RuberyJ. (1998) Integrating the internal and external labour markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics22(2): 199–220.
53.
HallD. T. (2004) The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior65(1): 1–13.
54.
HayesL. J.O’Brien-PallasL.DuffieldC.ShamianJ.BuchanJ.HughesF.StoneP. W. (2006) Nurse turnover: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies43(2): 237–263.
55.
HeracleousL. (2004) Boundaries in the study of organization. Human Relations57(1): 95–103.
56.
HernesT. (2004) Studying composite boundaries: A framework of analysis. Human Relations57(1): 9–29.
57.
HochschildA. R. (1997) The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work, New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
58.
HolmasT. (2002) Keeping nurses at work: A duration analysis. Health Economics11: 493–503.
59.
HousemanS. N. (2001) Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review55(1): 149–170.
60.
HudsonM. (2002) Flexibility and the reorganisation of work. In: BurchellB.LadipoD.WilkinsonF. (eds) Job insecurity and work intensification, London, England: Routledge, pp. 39–60.
61.
HustonC. J. (2010) Professional issues in nursing: Challenges and opportunities, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Walters Kluwer Health.
62.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (2004) The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
JurikN. C. (1998) Getting away and getting by: The experiences of self-employed homeworkers. Work and Occupations25(1): 7–35.
64.
KallebergA. L. (2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review74(1): 1–22.
65.
KallebergA. L.ReskinB. F.HudsonK. (2000) Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review65(2): 256–278.
66.
KallebergA.ReynoldsJ.MarsdenP. V. (2003) Externalizing employment: Flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations. Social Science Research32: 525–552.
67.
KarimA. (2014) The increasing usage of professional contingent workers: A review. The Journal of Global Business Management10(1): 33–36.
68.
KirkpatrickI.HoqueK. (2006) Accounting for the rise of professional agency work in UK public services. Work, Employment & Society20(4): 649–666.
69.
KraimerM. L.WayneS. J.LidenR. C.SparroweR. T. (2005) The role of job security in understanding the relationship between employees’ perceptions of temporary workers and employees’ performance. Journal of Applied Psychology90(2): 389–398.
70.
KreinerG. E.HollensbeE. C.SheepM. L. (2006) On the edge of identity: Boundary dynamics at the interface of individual and organizational identities. Human Relations59(10): 1315–1341.
71.
KreinerG. E.HollensbeE. C.SheepM. L. (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 704–730.
72.
KuhnP.LozanoF. (2008) The expanding workweek? Understanding trends in long work hours among U.S. men, 1979–2006. Journal of Labor Economics26(2): 311–343.
73.
KundaG. (1992) Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
74.
LafferG. (2005) Hospital speedups and the fiction of a nursing shortage. Labor Studies Journal30(1): 27–46.
75.
LamontM.MolnarV. (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
76.
LeeS.McCannD.MessengerJ. C. (2007) Working time around the world: Trends in work hours, laws and policies in a global perspective, London, England: Routledge.
77.
LynessK. S.GornickJ. C.StoneP.GrottoA. R. (2012) It’s all about control: Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review77: 1023–1049.
78.
MarlerJ.BarringerM. W.MilkovichG. T. (2002) Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: Worlds apart. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(4): 425–453.
79.
MarschallD. (2012) The company we keep: Occupational community in the high-tech network society, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
80.
McGovernP.SmeatonD.HillS. (2004) Bad jobs in Britain: Nonstandard employment and job quality. Work and Occupations31(2): 225–249.
81.
MeiksinsP.WhalleyP. (2002) Putting work in its place: A quiet revolution, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
82.
MoenP.LamJ.AmmonsS.KellyE. L. (2013) Time work by overworked professionals: Strategies in response to the stress of higher status. Work and Occupations40(2): 79–114.
83.
NeffG. (2012) Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk in innovative industries, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
84.
NegreyC. (2012) Work time: Conflict, control, and change, Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
85.
Nippert-EngC. E. (1996) Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
86.
O’CarrollA. (2008) Fuzzy holes and intangible times: Time in a knowledge economy. Time & Society17(2/3): 179–193.
87.
O’RiainS. (2000) Net-working for a living: Irish software developers in the global workplace. In: BurawoyM.BlumJ. A.GeorgeS.GilleZ.GowanT.HaneyL.KlawiterM.LopezS. H.O’RiainS.ThayerM. (eds) Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 175–202.
88.
OsnowitzD. (2005) Managing time in domestic space: Home-based contractors and household work. Gender & Society19(1): 83–103.
89.
OsnowitzD. (2010) Freelancing expertise: Contract professionals in the new Economy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
90.
PachuckiM. A.PendergrassS.LamontM. (2007) Boundary processes: Recent theoretical developments and new contributions. Poetics35: 331–351.
91.
PadavicI. (2005) Laboring under uncertainty: Identity renegotiation among contingent workers. Symbolic Interaction28(1): 111–134.
92.
PearceJ. L. (1993) Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers: Their psychological involvement and effects on employee co-workers. The Academic of Management Journal36(5): 1082–1096.
93.
PedullaD. S. (2013) The hidden costs of contingency: Employers’ use of contingent workers and standard employees’ outcomes. Social Forces92(2): 691–722.
94.
PerlowL. A. (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 57–81.
95.
PerssonsA. (2010) Soldiers and secretaries: Gendered boundary work in the Swedish armed forces. Scandinavian Journal of Management26(2): 166–175.
96.
PlatmanK. (2004) “Portfolio careers” and the search for flexibility in later life. Work, Employment & Society18(3): 573–599.
97.
RobertsK. (2007) Work-life balance: The sources of the contemporary problem and possible outcomes: A review and interpretation of the evidence. Employee Relations29(4): 334–351.
98.
RogersJ. K. (2001) There’s no substitute: The politics of time transfer in the teaching profession. Work and Occupations28: 64–90.
99.
RuberyJ.EarnshawJ. (2005) Employment policy and practice: Cross borders and disordering hierarchies. In: MarchingtonM.GrimshawD.RuberyJ.WillmottH. (eds) Fragmenting work: Blurring organizational boundaries and disordering hierarchies, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–177.
100.
RuberyJ.WardK.GrimshawC.BeynonH. (2005) Working time, industrial relations and the employment relationship. Time & Society14(1): 89–111.
101.
RubinB. A. (2007) Time-work discipline in the 21st century. Research in the Sociology of Work17: 1–26.
102.
SantosF. M.EisenhardtK. M. (2005) Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science16(5): 491–508.
103.
SchiemanS.MilkieM. A.GlavinP. (2009) When work interferes with life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. American Sociological Review74(December): 966–988.
104.
SchorJ. (1991) The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure, New York, NY: Basic Books.
105.
SennettR. (1999) The corrosion of character: Personal consequences of work in the new capitalism, New York, NY: Norton.
106.
SharoneO. (2004) Engineering overwork: Bell-curve management at a high-tech firm. In: Fuchs EpsteinC.KallebergA. (eds) Fighting for time: Shifting boundaries of work and social life, New York, NY: Russell Sage, pp. 191–218.
107.
ShermanR. (2007) Class acts: Service and inequality in luxury hotels, Berkeley: University of California Press.
108.
ShihJ. (2004) Project time in Silicon valley. Qualitative Sociology27(2): 223–245.
109.
SmithV. (2001) Teamwork vs. tempwork: Managers and the dualisms of workplace restructuring. In: CornfieldD. B.CampbellK. E.McCammonH. J. (eds) Working in restructured workplaces: Challenges and new directions for the sociology of work, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 7–28.
110.
SmithV. (2010) Enhancing employability: Human, cultural, and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Human Relations63(2): 279–300.
111.
StandingG. (2011) The precariat: The new dangerous class, London, England: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing.
112.
StanworthC.StanworthJ. (1997) Reluctant entrepreneurs and their clients: The case of self-employed freelance workers in the British book publishing industry. International Small Business Journal16(1): 58–73.
113.
StoneK. (2006) Legal protections for atypical employees: Employment law for workers without workplaces and employees without employers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law27: 251–285.
114.
StirpeL.BonacheJ.RevillaA. (2014) Differentiating the workforce: The performance effects of using contingent labor in a context of high-performance work systems. Journal of Business Research67(4): 1334–1341.
115.
StormerF. (2008) The logic of contingent work and overwork. Industrial Relations63(2): 343–361.
116.
SzaboK.NegyesiA. (2005) The spread of contingent work in the knowledge-based economy. Human Resource Development Review4(1): 63–85.
117.
TailbyS. (2005) Agency and bank nursing in the UK National Health Service. Work, Employment and Society19(2): 369–385.
118.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2015) Contingent workforce: Size, characteristics, earnings, and benefits. GAO 15-168R, Washington, DC: Author.
119.
VallasS. P. (2001) Symbolic boundaries and the new division of labor: Engineers, workers and the restructuring of factory life. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility18: 3–37.
120.
VidalM. (2013) Postfordism as a dysfunctional accumulation regime: A comparative analysis of the USA, the UK and Germany. Work, Employment and Society27(3): 451–547.
121.
von HippelC.KalokerinosE. K. (2012) When temporary employees are perceived as threatening: Antecedents and consequences. Leadership and Organization Development Journal33(2): 200–216.
122.
VoskoL. F. (2010) Managing the margins: Gender, citizenship, and the international regulation of precarious employment, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
123.
VoughH. C.BroschakJ. P.NorthcraftG. B. (2005) Here today, gone tomorrow? Effects of nonstandard work status on workgroup processes and outcomes. Status and Groups: Research on Managing Groups and Teams7: 229–257.
124.
WayS. A.LepakD. P.FayC. H.ThackerJ. W. (2010) Contingent workers’ impact on standard employee withdrawal behaviors: Does what you use them for matter?Human Resource Management49(1): 109–138.
125.
WeickK. (1995) Sensemaking in organizations, London, England: Sage Publications.
126.
WeinbergD. (2003) Code green: Money-driven hospitals and the dismantling of nursing, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
127.
YodanisC. L. (2002) Producing social class representations: Women’s work in a rural town. Gender & Society16(3): 323–344.
128.
ZerubavelE. (1979) Patterns of time in hospital life, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
129.
ZerubavelE. (1991) The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life, New York, NY: Free Press.
130.
ZietsmaC.LawrenceT. B. (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly55(2): 189–221.
