The public and nonprofit sectors are known for providing enhanced employment opportunity to women, persons of color, and parents. The authors ask whether the same is true for workers without college degrees, examining sectoral differences in access to jobs offering fringe benefits, full-time hours, and schedule flexibility. The authors find that the influence of sector and union representation on job quality varies by type of benefit. For example, among public and for-profit employees, union representation is positively associated with benefits availability. Nonprofit employees of either union status have less access to full-time hours, and schedule flexibility is comparably available to all but unionized for-profit workers.
AlthauserR.KallebergA. (1981). Firms, occupations, and the structure of labour markets. In BergI. (Ed.), Sociological perspectives on labour markets (pp. 119-149). New York, NY: Academic Press.
BahramiB.BitzanJ.LeitchJ. (2009). Union worker wage effect in the public sector. Journal of Labor Research, 30, 35-51.
5.
BainesD.CunninghamI. (2011). Employment implications of the outsourcing of public services to voluntary, not-for-profit organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24, 684-693.
Ben-NerA.RenT.PaulsonD. F. (2011). A sectoral comparison of wage levels and wage inequality in human services industries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 608-633.
8.
BernhardtA.DresserL. (2002). Why privatizing government services would hurt women workers. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
9.
BlankR. (1985). An analysis of workers’ choice between employment in the public and private sectors. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38, 211-224.
10.
BousheyH. (2005). No way out: How prime-age workers get trapped in minimum-wage jobs. WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society, 8, 659-670.
11.
BousheyH.FremstadS.GraggR.WallerM. (2007). Understanding low-wage work in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for Economic Policy Research.
BousheyH.TillyC. (2009). The limits of work-based social support in the United States. Challenge, 52(2), 81-114.
14.
BoyneG.JenkinsG.PooleM. (1999). Human resource management in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison. Public Administration, 77, 407-420.
15.
CapulongE. (2005-2006). Which side are you on? Unionization in social service nonprofits. New York City Law Review, 9, 373-404.
CostoS. (2006, February). Trends in retirement plan coverage over the last decade. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 58-64.
19.
Council of Economic Advisors. (2010). Work-life balance and the economics of flexibility. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
20.
DeWittL. (1996). Origins of the three-legged stool metaphor for Social Security (Research Note No. 1, Historian’s Office, U.S. Social Security Administration). Retrieved from http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/stool.html.
21.
DolcosS.DaleyD. (2009). Work pressure, workplace social resources, and work–family conflict: The tale of two sectors. International Journal of Stress Management, 16, 291-311.
22.
DonahueJ. (2008). The warping of government work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
DruckerP. (1989, July-August). What business can learn from nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, pp. 88-93.
24.
EdwardsC. (2010). Public sector unions and the rising costs of employee compensation. Cato Journal, 30(1), 87-115.
25.
FreemanR. (1988). Contraction and expansion: The divergence of private sector and public sector unionism in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(2), 63-88.
26.
FreemanR.IchniowskiC. (1988). Introduction: The public sector look of American unionism. In FreemanR.IchiowskiC. (Eds.), When public sector workers unionize (pp. 1-15), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
FriedmanM. (1970, September13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, pp. 217-223.
GalinskyE.SteinP. (1990). The impact of human resource policies on employees: Balancing work/family life. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 368-383.
30.
GerstelN.ClawsonD. (2001). Unions’ responses to family concerns. Social Problems, 48, 277-298.
31.
GoldenL. (2009). Flexible daily work schedules in U.S. jobs: Formal introductions needed?Industrial Relations, 48, 27-54.
32.
GonyeaJ. (1999). The nonprofit sector’s responsiveness to work-family issues. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 562, 127-142.
33.
GregoryR.BorlandJ. (1999). Recent developments in public sector labor markets. In AshenfelterO.CardD. (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 3573-3630). New York, NY: Elsevier.
34.
GregoryA. G.HowardD. (2009). The nonprofit starvation cycle. Stanford Social Innovation Review, pp. 49-53.
35.
Haley-LockA.KruzichJ. (2008). Serving workers in the human services: The roles of organizational ownership, chain affiliation and professional leadership in front-line job benefits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 443-467.
36.
HenlyJ. R.ShaeferH. L.WaxmanR. E. (2006). Nonstandard work schedules: Employer- and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs. Social Service Review, 80, 609-634.
37.
HolzerH. (2008). Workforce development as an antipoverty strategy: What do we know? What should we do? (IZA Discussion Paper 3776). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1293548
38.
HolzerH.LaLondeR. (2000). Job change and job stability among less skilled young workers. In CardD. (Ed.), Finding jobs: Work and welfare reform (pp. 125-59). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
39.
HunterL. (2000). What determines job quality in nursing homes?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 463-481.
40.
HuselidM. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
41.
JacobsD. (1994). Organizational theory and dualism: Some sociological determinants of spot and internal labor markets. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 13, 203-235.
42.
JohnsonR.CorcoranM. (2003). The road to economic self-sufficiency: Job quality and job transition patterns after welfare reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 615-639.
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2011). Employer health benefits: 2011 summary of findings. Retrieved from http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/8226.pdf
45.
KallebergA. (2006). Beyond profit? Sectoral differences in high-performance work practices. Work and Occupations, 33, 271-302.
46.
KallebergA. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1-22.
47.
KallebergA. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
48.
KallebergA.ReskinB.HudsonK. (2000). Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 65, 256-278.
KayeK.NightingaleD. S. (2000). Introduction and overview. In KayeK.NightingaleD. S. (Eds.), The low-wage labor market: Challenges and opportunities for economic self-sufficiency (pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
51.
KearneyR. (2003). Patterns of union decline and growth: An organizational ecology perspective. Journal of Labor Research, 14, 561-578.
52.
KeefeJ. (2011). Are public employees overpaid?Labor Studies Journal, 37(1), 104-126. doi:10.1177/0160449X11429263
53.
KimC.SakamotoA. (2010). Assessing the consequences of declining unionization and public-sector employment: A density-function decomposition of rising inequality from 1983 to 2005. Work and Occupations, 37, 119-161.
54.
LambertS. (2008). Passing the buck: Labor flexibility practices that transfer risk onto hourly workers. Human Relations, 61, 1203-1227.
55.
LambertS.Haley-LockA. (2004). The organizational stratification of opportunities for work-life balance: Addressing issues of equality and social justice in the workplace. Community, Work and Family, 7, 179-195.
56.
LambertS. J.Haley-LockA.HenlyJ. (2012). Work schedule flexibility in hourly jobs: Unanticipated consequences and promising directions. Community, Work & Family, 15, 293-315.
57.
LeeteL. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 423-446.
58.
LeeteL. (2001). Wither the nonprofit wage differential? Estimates from the 1990 Census. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 136-170.
59.
LeeteL. (2006). Work in the nonprofit sector. In PowellW.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 159-177). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
LewinD.KochanT.Cutcher-GershenfeldJ.GhilarducciT.KatzH.KeefeJ.WellerC. (2011). Getting it right: Empirical evidence and policy implications from research on public sector unionism and collective bargaining. Champaign, IL: Employment Policy Research Network and Labor and Employment Relations Association.
61.
LightP. (2002, October3). Winning the talent war: New Brookings survey finds the nonprofit sector has the most dedicated workforce (News Release). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
62.
LipskyM.SmithS. R. (1989-90). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 625-648.
63.
MacDuffieJ. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197-221.
64.
MackyK. (2008). Employee experiences of high-performance work systems: An analysis of sectoral, occupational, organizational and employee variables. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 33(1), 1-18.
65.
MastracciS.ThompsonJ. (2009). Who are the contingent workers in the federal government?The American Review of Public Administration, 39, 352-373.
66.
McDonaldP.BradleyL.BrownK. (2009). “Full-time is a given here”: Part-time versus full-time job quality. British Journal of Management, 20, 143-157.
67.
MirvisP.HackettE. (1983, April). Work and work force characteristics in the nonprofit sector. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 3-12.
68.
MoultonS. (2009). Putting together the publicness puzzle: A framework for realized publicness. Public Administration Review, 69, 889-900.
69.
Nonprofit Overhead Cost Project. (2004). Getting what we pay for: Low overhead limits nonprofit effectiveness (Brief No. 3). Washington, DC/Bloomington: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, Urban Institute, and Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University.
70.
OnyxJ.MacleanM. (1996). Careers in the third sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 331-345.
PerryJ.WiseL. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-372.
73.
PetersJ.MasaokaJ. (2000). A house divided: How nonprofits experience union drives. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10, 305-317.
74.
PfefferJ. (2005). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 95-106.
75.
Pitt-CatsouphesM.SwanbergJ.BondJ.GalinskyE. (2004). Work-life policies and programs: Comparing the responsiveness of nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 291-312.
76.
PrestonA. (1990). Women in the white-collar nonprofit sector: The best option or the only option?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 560-568.
77.
RaineyH.BozemanB. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Policy Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447-469.
SaltzsteinA.TingY.SaltzsteinG. (2001). Work-family balance and job satisfaction: The impact of family-friendly policies on attitudes of federal government employees. Public Administration Review, 61, 452-467.
80.
SchmittJ. (2007). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Job quality in the United States over the three most recent business cycles. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
81.
SchmittJ. (2010). The wage penalty for state and local government employees. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
ThompsonJ.SchmittJ. (2010, September). The wage penalty for state and local government employees in New England (Joint Working Paper). Amherst, MA/Washington, DC: Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, and the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
85.
TillyC. (1996). Half a job: Bad and good part-time jobs in a changing labor market. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
86.
TillyC. (1997). Arresting the decline of good jobs in the USA?Industrial Relations Journal, 28, 269-274.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012b, January). Table 3. Union affiliation of employed wage and salary workers by occupation and industry (Economic News Release). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.t03.htm
