This study assesses three explanations for cross-national differences in unionization: Western’s (1997) institutional model, economic explanations based on the business cycle or globalization, and Hechter’s (2004) solidaristic theory. This study features a multilevel analysis of employed workers with the late 1990s World Values surveys of 18 affluent democracies. The analyses generally support the institutional model. Left parties and ghent systems remain influential, though ghent is less robust. Neo-corporatism and wage coordination are insignificant whereas workplace access is the more salient indicator of centralization. Beyond Western’s model, right cabinet significantly weakens unionization. Refuting economic explanations, inflation, unemployment, and economic growth, as well as international trade and investment, do not influence unionization. Consistent with Hechter’s claims, the welfare state reduces unionization but, contradicting his claims, immigration does not undermine unions. Ultimately, this study supports a revised institutional model that supplements Western’s model with right cabinet and the welfare state.
Allan, J. B., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496-512.
2.
Bain, G., & Elsheikh, F. (1976). Union growth and the business cycle: An econometric analysis. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
3.
Baldwin, R. E. (2003). The decline of U.S. labor unions and the role of trade. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
4.
Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (1982). The deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Brady, D., Beckfield, J., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2005). Economic globalization and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975-2001. American Sociological Review, 70, 921-948.
6.
Brady, D., & Denniston, R. (2006). Economic globalization, industrialization, and deindustrialization in affluent democracies. Social Forces, 85(1), 297-329.
7.
Brady, D., & Leicht, K. (2006). Party to inequality: Right party power and income inequality in rich Western democracies. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.
8.
Brady, D., & Wallace, M. (2000). Spatialization, foreign direct investment and labor outcomes in the American states, 1976-1996. Social Forces, 79, 67-100.
9.
Briggs, V. M., Jr. (2001). Immigration and American unionism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
Bruno, M., & Sachs, J. (1985). The economics of worldwide stagflation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11.
Clark, T. N., & Lipset, S. M. (2001). The breakdown of class politics. Washington, DC, Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Clawson, D., & Clawson, M. A. (1999). What has happened to the U.S. labor movement? Union decline and renewal. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 95-119.
13.
Cooke, W. N., & Gautsch, F. H. (1982). Political bias in NLRB unfair labor practice decisions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 35, 539-549.
14.
Cornfield, D. B. (1989). Becoming a mighty voice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Cornfield, D. B. (1991). The U.S. labor movement: its development and impact on social inequality and politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 27-49.
16.
Ebbinghaus, B., & Visser, J. (1999). When institutions matter: Union growth and decline in Western Europe, 1950-1995. European Sociological Review, 15, 135-158.
17.
Ebbinghaus, B., & Visser, J. (2000). The societies of Europe: Trade unions in Western Europe since 1945. New York: Grove’s Dictionaries.
18.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Farber, H. S., & Western, B. (2001). Accounting for the decline of unions in the private sector, 1973-1998. Journal of Labor Research, 22, 459-485.
20.
Farber, H. S., & Western, B. (2002). Ronald Reagan and the politics of declining union organization. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, 385-401.
21.
Fiorito, J., & Greer, C. R. (1982). Determinants of U.S. unionism: past research and future needs. Industrial Relations, 21, 1-32.
22.
Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do?New York: Basic Books.
23.
Golden, M., & Pontusson, J. (1992). Bargaining for change: Union politics in North America and Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Golden, M. A., Wallerstein, M., & Lange, P. (1999). Postwar trade-union organization and industrial relations in twelve countries. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism (pp. 194-230). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Gordon, D. (1994). The global economy: New edifice or crumbling foundation? In D. M. Kotz, T. McDonough, & M. Reich (Eds.), Social structures of accumulation: The political economy of growth and crisis (pp. 292-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Harrison, B., & Bluestone, B. (1988). The great U-turn. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Hechter, M. (2004). From class to culture. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 400-445.
28.
Hirsch, B. T., & Addison, J. T. (1986). The economic analysis of unions: New approaches and evidence. London: Allen & Unwin.
29.
Howell, C. (1995). Trade unions and the state: A critique of British industrial relations. Politics & Society, 23, 149-183.
30.
Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J. D., Brady, D., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Comparative welfare states data set. Northwestern University, University of North Carolina, Duke University, and Indiana University.
31.
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Inglehart, R., & Collaborators (European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association). (2005). European and world values surveys integrated data file, 1999-2002, Release I (2nd ICPSR Version). Available at www.worldvaluessurvey.com
33.
International Monetary Fund. (2003). International financial statistics database. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Kenworthy, L. (2003). Quantitative indicators of corporatism. International Journal of Sociology, 33, 10-44.
35.
King, D., & Wood, S. (1999). The political economy of neoliberalism: Britain and the United States in the 1980s. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism (pp. 371-397). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Kingston, P. W. (2000). The classless society. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
37.
Kitschelt, H., Lange P., Marks G., & Stephens, J. D. (Eds.). (1999). Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Boston: Routledge.
39.
Lee, C. S. (2005). International migration, deindustrialization and union decline in 16 affluent OECD countries, 1962-1997. Social Forces, 84, 71-88.
40.
Leicht, K. T., Wallace, M., & Grant, D. S., II. (1993). Union presence, class, and individual earnings inequality. Work and Occupations, 20, 429-451.
41.
Lopez, S. H. (2005). Bring out yer dead. Work and Occupations, 32, 355-359.
42.
Milkman, R. (2000). Organizing immigrants: The challenge for unions in contemporary California. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43.
Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (1999). Social democratic labor market institutions: A retrospective analysis. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. D. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism (pp. 231-260). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Ness, I. (2005). Immigrants, unions, and the new U.S. labor market. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
45.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). OECD social expenditures data base, 1980/1998. Paris: Author.
46.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003a). OECD health data CD-ROM, eco-sante. Paris: Author.
47.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003b). Organization for economic cooperation and development, labor force statistics. Paris: Author.
48.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Trends in international migration. Paris: Author.
49.
Oskarsson, S. (2005). Institutional explanations of union strength: An assessment. Politics & Society, 31, 609-635.
50.
Pakulski, J., & Waters, M. (1996). The death of class. London: Sage.
51.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.
52.
Quinn, D. (1997). The correlates of change in international financial regulation. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 531-551.
53.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T., Jr. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
55.
Rothstein, B. (1992). Labor market institutions and working-class strength. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics (pp. 33-56). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Sassoon, D. (1996). One hundred years of socialism: The West European left in the twentieth century. London: Fontana Press.
57.
Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66, 806-828.
58.
Scruggs, L., & Lange, P. (2002). Where have all the members gone? Globalization, institutions, and union density. Journal of Politics, 64, 126-153.
59.
Stephens, J. D. (1979). The transition from capitalism to socialism. London: Macmillan.
60.
Sutcliffe, B., & Glyn, A. (1999). Still underwhelmed: Indicators of globalization and their misinterpretation. Review of Radical Political Economics, 31, 111-132.
61.
Visser, J. (2002). Why fewer workers join unions in Europe: A social custom explanation of membership trends. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, 403-430.
62.
Voss, K., & Fantasia, R. (2004). The future of American labor: Reinventing unions. Contexts, 3(2), 35-41.
63.
Wallace, M., & Brady, D. (2001). The next long swing: Spatialization, technocratic control, and the restructuring of work at the turn of the century. In A. L. Kalleberg & I. Berg (Eds.), Sourcebook on labor markets: Evolving structures and processes (pp. 101-133). New York: Plenum.
64.
Wallace, M., Leicht, K. T., & Raffalovich, L. E. (1999). Unions, strikes, and labor’s share of income: A quarterly analysis of the United States. Social Science Research, 28, 265-288.
65.
Wallerstein, M., & Western, B. (2000). Unions in decline? What has changed and why. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 355-377.
66.
Watts, J. R. (2002). Immigration policy and the challenge of globalization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67.
Western, B. (1994). Institutional mechanisms for unionization in sixteen OECD countries: An analysis of social survey data. Social Forces, 73, 497-519.
68.
Western, B. (1995). A comparative study of working-class disorganization: union decline in eighteen advanced capitalist countries. American Sociological Review, 60, 179-201.
69.
Western, B. (1997). Between class and market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
Wood, A. (1994). North-South: Trade, employment and inequality. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
71.
Wright, E. O. (1997). Class counts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
