Most employeeswork in large organizations, enjoying the potential benefits of forming career-enhancing intraorganizational networks. By contrast, small business owners must look to external contexts such as voluntary associations for their business-enhancing ties. This research discusses ways through which involvement in voluntary associations can enhance or diminish occupational diversity and density for owners' networks. Whether owners met their alters (members of respondents'business discussion network, individuals they nominated as persons with whom they would discuss business matters) in voluntary association memberships and whether comemberships are concentrated in one or dispersed among several organizations influence the occupational diversity and density of their networks. The article concludes that voluntary association memberships help owners overcome some of the career isolation produced by their social location.
Babchuk, N., & Edwards, J. N. (1965). Voluntary associations and the integration hypothesis. Sociological Inquiry, 35(2), 149-162.
2.
Bekkers, R., Völker, B., Van der Gaag, M. P. J., & Flap, H. D. (in press). Social networks of participants in voluntary associations. In N. Lin& B. Erickson (Eds.), Social capital: Advances in research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
3.
Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1999). Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. American Political Science Review, 93(1), 153-168.
4.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Burt, R. S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19(4), 355-373.
6.
Campbell, K. E. (1988). Gender differences in job-related networks. Work and Occupations, 15(2), 179-200.
7.
Campbell, K. E., Marsden, P. V., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8(1), 97-117.
8.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
9.
Cooper, A., & Dunkelberg, W. (1987). Old questions, new answers and methodological issues. American Journal of Small Business, 11(3), 11-23.
10.
Eastis, C. M. (1998). Organizational diversity and the production of social capital. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(1), 66-77.
11.
Finlay, W., & Coverdill, J. E. (2000). Risk, opportunism, and structural holes: How headhunters manage clients and earn fees. Work and Occupations, 27(3), 377-405.
12.
Glanville, J. (2004). Voluntary associations and social network structure: Why organization location and type are important. Sociological Forum, 19(3), 465-491.
13.
Gould, R. V. (1993). Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 182-196.
14.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
15.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
16.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-447.
17.
Kalleberg, A., & Leicht, K. (1991). Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 136-161.
18.
Kaufman, J. (2002). For the common good? American civic life and the golden age of fraternity. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Lieberson, S. (1969). Measuring population diversity. American Sociological Review, 34(6), 850-862.
20.
Liedka, R. V. (1991). Who do you know in the group? Location of organizations in interpersonal networks. Social Forces, 70(2), 455-474.
21.
Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8(4), 365-385.
22.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122-131.
24.
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133-1156.
25.
McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P. A., & Drobnic, S. (1992). Social networks and organizational dynamics. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 153-170.
26.
McPherson, J. M., & Rotolo, T. (1995). Measuring the composition of voluntary groups: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Social Forces, 73(3), 1097-1115.
27.
McPherson, J. M., & Rotolo, T. (1996). Testing a dynamic model of social composition: Diversity and change in voluntary groups. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 179-202.
28.
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1982). Women and weak ties: Differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 87(4), 883-904.
29.
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 61-79.
30.
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52(3), 370-379.
31.
McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
32.
Munch, A. J., McPherson, M. J., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1997). Gender, children, and social contact: The effects of childrearing for men and women. American Sociological Review, 62(4), 509-520.
33.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
34.
Olsen, M. E. (1982). Participatory pluralism: Political participation and influence in the United States and Sweden. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
35.
Pescosolido, B. A., & Rubin, B. A. (2000). The web of group affiliations revisited: Social life, postmodernism, and sociology. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 52-76.
36.
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673-693.
37.
Popielarz, P. A. (1999a). (In)voluntary association: A multilevel analysis of gender segregation in voluntary associations. Gender & Society, 13(2), 234-250.
38.
Popielarz, P. A. (1999b). Organizational constraints on personal network formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 263-281.
39.
Popielarz, P. A., & McPherson, J. M. (1995). On the edge or in between: Niche position, niche overlap, and the duration of voluntary association memberships. American Journal of Sociology, 101(3), 698-720.
40.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
41.
Reese, P. R. (1993). Entrepreneurial networks and resource acquisition: Does gender make a difference?Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
42.
Reese, P. R., & Aldrich, H. E. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and business performance. In S. Birley & I. C. MacMillan (Eds.), International entrepreneurship (pp. 124-144. London: Routledge.
43.
Renzulli, L. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Who can you turn to: Tie activiation within core business discussion networks. Social Forces, 84(1), 323-341.
44.
Renzulli, L. A., Aldrich, H. E., & Moody, J. (2000). Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79(2), 523-546.
45.
Reskin, B. (1993). Sex segregation in theworkplace. Annual Reviewof Sociology, 19, 241-270.
46.
Reynolds, P. D., & White, S. B. (1997). The entrepreneurial process: Economic growth, men, women, and minorities. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
47.
Rotolo, T. (2000). A time to join, a time to quit: The influence of life cycle transitions on voluntary association membership. Social Forces, 78(3), 1133-1161.
48.
Sicilano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1313-1320.
49.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Wellman, B. (2000). Changing connectivity: A future history of y2.03k. Sociological Research Online, 4. Available from www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/wellman.html
51.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
52.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. A. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteerwork. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694-713.
