This article examines the determinants of professional commitment of college-educated specialists in one of the Russian provinces. We analyze the specialists’ professional commitment as determined by two sets of orientations: universalistic instrumental factors (compensation, career advancement and opportunities of alternative employment) and specifically professional noninstrumental factors (professional responsibility, cognitive orientation, and cultural capital). Although both instrumental and noninstrumental factors affect professional commitment of Russian specialists, noninstrumental factors are the most important. The article also identifies significant differences between two groups of Russian professionals, technocrats, and the traditional intelligentsia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A. (1983). Professional ethics. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 855-885.
2.
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Aranya, N., Pollock, J., & Amernic, J. (1981). An examination of professional commitment in public accounting. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 6, 271-280.
4.
Balzer, H. (1998). Russia’s middle classes. Post-Soviet Affairs, 14, 165-186.
5.
Ben-David, J. (1958). The professional role of the physician in bureaucratized medicine: A study in role conflict. Human Relations, 2, 901-911.
6.
Blau, P., & Scott, R. (1962). Formal organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.
7.
Bledstein, B. J. (1976). The culture of professionalism. New York: Norton.
8.
Bonnell, V. (1996). Winners and losers in Russia’s economic transition. In V. Bonnell (Ed.), Identities in transition: Eastern Europe and Russia after the collapse of communism (pp. 13-28). Berkeley, CA: International and Area Studies, No. 93.
9.
Boreham, P. (1983). Indetermination: Professional knowledge, organization and control. Sociological Review, 31, 693-718.
10.
Borisova, U. S. (1998). Sotsial’nyi portret uchitelya Respubliki Sakha [Social portrait of the teacher in the Republic of Sakha]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 8, 82-88.
11.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972)
12.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979)
13.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
14.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1984)
15.
Bridges, W., & Villemez, W. (1991). Employment relations and the labor market: Integrating institutional and market perspectives. American Sociological Review, 56, 748-764.
16.
Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Burawoy, M. (2001). Neoclassical sociology: From the end of communism to the end of classes. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1099-1120.
18.
Chernysh, M. (1995). Sotsial’naya mobil’nost’ i massovoe soznanie [Social mobility and mass consciousness]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1, 134-138.
19.
Churchward, L. (1973). The soviet intelligentsia: An essay on the social structure and roles of soviet intellectuals during the 1960s. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
20.
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society. New York: Academic.
21.
Derber, C. (1983). Managing professionals: Ideological proletarianization and post-industrial labor. Theory and Society, 12, 309-341.
22.
Derber, C., & Schwartz, W. (1991). New mandarins or new proletariat?: Professional power at work. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 8, 71-96.
23.
Derber, C., Schwartz, W., & Magrass, Y. (1990). Power in the highest degree: Professionals and the rise of a new mandarin order. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Desai, P., & Idson, T. (2000). Work without wages: Russia’s nonpayment crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
25.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
26.
Eyal, G., Szelenyi, I., & Townsley, E. (1998). Making capitalism without capitalists: Class formation and elite struggles in post-communist central Europe. London: Verso.
27.
Finley, A. P., Mueller, C. W., & Gurney, C.A. (2003). Organizational and professional commitment in professional and nonprofessional organizations: The case of nurse doctorates. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 20, 325-358.
28.
Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead.
29.
Friedson, E. (1984). The changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 1-20.
30.
Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Freidson, E. (1994). Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Gerber, T. P., & Hout, M. (1998). More shock than therapy: Market transition, employment, and income in Russia, 1991-1995. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1-50.
34.
Gimpelson, V., Gorbacheva, T., & Lippoldt, D. (1997). Dvizhenie rabochei sily [Turnover of the labour power]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2, 125-133.
35.
Goldberg, C., & Kishkovsky, S. (2000, December 16). Russia’s doctors are beggars at work, paupers at home. The New York Times, p. A1.
36.
Goode, W. F. (1957). Community within a community. American Sociological Review, 22, 194-200.
37.
Halaby, C. N. (1988). Action and information in the job mobility process: The search decision. American Sociological Review, 53, 9-25.
38.
Hall, R. H. (1967). Some organizational considerations in professional-organization conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 461-478.
39.
Halpern, S. A. (1992). Dynamics of professional control: Internal coalitions and cross professional boundaries. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 994-1021.
40.
Haug, M. (1973). Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 195-212.
41.
Heimer, C. A., & Staffen, L. R. (1998). For the sake of the children: The social organization of responsibility in the hospital and at the home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Horowitz, T. R. (1985). Professionalism and semi-professionalism among immigrant teachers from the U.S.S.R. and North America. Comparative Education, 21, 297-307.
43.
Jones, A. (1991). Professionalization. In A. Jones (Ed.), Professions and the state: Expertise and authority in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe (pp. 85-99). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
44.
Konrad, G., & Szelenyi, I. (1979). The intellectual sontheroad to class power. London: Verso.
45.
Krause, E. A. (1991). Professions and the state in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe: Theoretical issues. In A. Jones (Ed.), Professions and the state: Expertise and autonomy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe (pp. 3-42). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
46.
Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
Lane, D. S. (1982). The end of social inequality? Class, status, and power under state socialism. London: Allen and Unwin.
48.
Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment and exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89-108.
50.
Leicht, K. T., & Fennell, M. L. (1997). The changing organizational context of professional work. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 215-231.
51.
Leicht, K. T., & Fennell, M. L. (2001). Professional work: A sociological approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
52.
Lincoln, J., & Kalleberg, A. (1990). Culture, control and commitment: A study of work organizations and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Lonkila, M. (1998). The social meaning of work: Aspects of the teaching profession in post-Soviet Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 50, 699-712.
54.
Mansurov, V. A., & Semenova, L. A. (1998). Intelligentsia konversiruemykh predpriyatii (Intelligentsia of conversion enterprises). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 10, 96-105.
55.
Matthews, M. (1978). Privilege in the Soviet Union: A study of elite lifestyles under communism. London: Allen and Unwin.
56.
McDuff, E. M., & Mueller, C. W. (2000). The ministry as an occupational labor market: Intentions to leave an employer (church) versus intention to leave a profession (ministry). Work and Occupations, 27, 89-116.
57.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Morrow, P. C., & Wirth, R. E. (1989). Work commitment among salaried professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34, 40-56.
59.
Mueller, C. W., & Lawler, E. J. (1999). Commitment to nested organizational units: Some basic principles and preliminary findings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 325-346.
60.
Naumova, T. V. (1995). Intelligentsia i puti razvitiya rossiiskogo oshchestva [Intelligentsia and directions of development of Russian society]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, 39-46.
61.
Oppenheimer, M. (1973). The proletarianization of the professional. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 213-217.
62.
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
63.
Piirainen, T. (1997). Towards a new social order in Russia: Transforming structures and everyday life. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
64.
Reynolds, L., Masters, S. H., & Moser, C. H. (1986). Readings in labor economics and labor relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
65.
Rubina, L. J. (1996). Professional’noe i sotsial’noe samochuvstvie uchitelei [Professional and social self-identification of teachers]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 6, 63-75.
66.
Ruvinsky, L. (1997). As prestige and funding wane, Siberian scientists struggle to survive. Transitions, 21, 11-15.
67.
Schecter, K. (2000). The politics of health care in Russia: The feminization of medicine and other obstacles to professionalism. In M. G. Field & J. L. Twigg (Eds.), Russia’s torn safety nets: Health and social welfare during the transition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
68.
Schmidt, J. (2000). Disciplined minds: A critical look at salaried professionals and the soulbattering system that shapes their lives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
69.
Scott, W. R. (1966). Professionals in bureaucracies—Areas of conflict. In H. M. Vollmer & D. L. Mills (Eds.), Professionalization (pp. 265-275). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70.
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
71.
Sillaste, G. G. (2000). Izmeneniya sotsial’noi mobilnosti i ekonomicheskogo povedeniya zhenshin [Changing mobility and economic behavior among women]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 5, 25-34.
72.
Silverman, B., & Yanowitch, M. (2000). New rich, new poor, new Russia: Winners and losers on the Russian road to capitalism. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
73.
Sorenson, J. E. (1967). Professional and bureaucratic organization in the public accounting firm. Accounting Review, 42, 553-565.
74.
Steel, R. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (1989). The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: a methodological or conceptual artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 846-854.
75.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. New York: Harcourt Brace.
76.
Tawney, R. H. (1920). The acquisitive society. New York: Harcourt Brace.
77.
Toren, N. (1975). Deprofessionalization and its sources. Work and Occupations, 2, 323-337.
78.
Tuma, B. N., & Grimes, A. J. (1981). A comparison of models of role orientations of professionals in a research-oriented university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 187-206.
79.
Voslensky, M. (1984). Nomenklatura: The Soviet ruling class. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
80.
Wallace, J. E. (1995a). Corporatist control and organizational commitment among professionals: The case of lawyers working in law firms. Social Forces, 73, 811-839.
81.
Wallace, J. E. (1995b). Organizational and professional commitment in professional and nonprofessional organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 228-255.
82.
Waters, M. (1989). Collegiality, bureaucratization, and professionalization: A Weberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 945-972.
83.
White, A. (2000). Social change in provincial Russia: The intelligentsia in a raion centre. Europe-Asia Studies, 52, 667-693.
84.
White, H. (1970). The chains of opportunity: System models of mobility in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70, 137-159.
86.
Wright, E. O. (1985). Classes. New York: Verso.
87.
Zinchenko, G. P. (1999). Gossluzhaschshie region a: sostav i sotsial’nye osobennosti [Civic servants of a region: Composition and social specifics]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2, 25-33.
