This article examines patterns of occupational sex segregation for women and men born in the 1950s and early 1960s in the former East and West Germany prior to unification. Given the nature of family policies, we had expected to find an increase in the gender-typicality of occupations as individuals married and had children especially in the West. Yet, despite high levels of occupational sex segregation and clear evidence of the “holding power” of gender-typical occupations for both countries, we found almost no support for the neoclassical notion that family formation influences the gender type of an occupation. This is consistent with previous U.S.-based research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, M. A., & Brayfield, A. (1997). Women’s work values in unified Germany. Regional differences as remnants of the past. Work and Occupations, 24, 245-266.
2.
Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS System: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Berghahn, S., & Fritzsche, A. (1991). Frauenrecht in Ostund Westdeutschland: Bilanz, Ausblick [Women’s rights in East and West Germany: Situation, outlook]. Berlin, Germany: Basisdruck Verlag.
5.
Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759-799.
6.
Blackwell, L. (2001). Occupational sex segregation and part-time work in modern Britain. Gender, Work and Organization, 8, 146-163.
7.
Blossfeld, H.-P. (1987). Labor-market entry and the sexual segregation of careers in the Federal Republic of Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 89-118.
8.
Blossfeld, H.-P., & Rohwer, G. (1997). Part-time work in Germany. In H.-P. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalisation and marginalisation: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 164-190). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Born, C. (2000). Erstausbildung und weiblicher Lebenslauf. Was (nicht nur) junge Frauen bezüglich der Berufswahl wissen sollten [First occupational training and female life course. What (not only) young women should know about occupational decisions]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 3. Beiheft, 50-65.
10.
Brückner, H. (2000). The dynamics of social stability: Gender inequality in the labor market in West Germany 1975-1995. Unpublished doctorial thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
11.
Brückner, E., & Mayer, K. U. (1998). Collecting life history data. Experiences from the German Life History Study. In J. Z. Giele & G. H. Elder (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 152-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Buchmann, M., & Charles, M. (1995). Organizational and institutional factors in the process of gender stratification: Comparing social arrangements in six European countries. International Journal of Sociology, 25, 66-95.
13.
Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204-225.
14.
Chan, T. W. (1999). Revolving doors reexamined: Occupational sex segregation over the life course. American Sociological Review, 64, 86-96.
15.
Charles, M., & Buchmann, M. (1994). Assessing micro-level explanations of occupational sex segregation: Human-capital development and labor market opportunities in Switzerland. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie, 20, 595-620.
16.
Charles, M., Buchmann, M., Halebsky, S., Powers, J. M., & Smith, M. M. (2001). The context of women’s market careers. Work and Occupations, 28, 371-396.
17.
Charles, M., & Grusky, D.B. (in press). Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
Desai, S., & Waite, L. J. (1991). Women’s employment during pregnancy and after the first child birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review, 56, 551-566.
19.
Engelbrech, G. (1991). Berufsausbildung, Berufseinstieg und Berufsverlauf von Frauen [Vocational training, labor force entry and employment history of women]. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarktund Berufsforschung, 24, 531-558.
20.
England, P. (1982). The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation. Journal of Human Resources, 17, 358-370.
21.
Filer, R. K. (1989). Occupational segregation: Compensating differentials, and comparable work. In R. M. H. Hartmann&B. O’Farrell (Eds.), Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries (pp. 153-170). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
22.
Fritzsche, Y., & Münchmeier, R. (2000). Mädchen und Jungen [Girls and boys]. In Deutsche Shell-Aktiengesellschaft (Ed.), Jugend 2000, Band 1 [Youth 2000] (Vol. 1, pp. 343-348). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
23.
Glass, J. (1990). The impact of occupational segregation on working conditions. Social Forces, 68, 779-796.
24.
Glass, J., & Camarigg, V. (1992). Gender, parenthood, and job-family compatibility. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 131-151.
25.
Gorman, E. (1999). Bringing home the bacon: Marital allocation of income-earning responsibilities, job shifts, and men’s wages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 110-122.
26.
Gornick, J. C. (1999). Gender equality in the labor market: Women’s employment and earnings. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender policy regimes and welfare states (pp. 117-146). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. K., & Ross, K. E. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 7, 45-70.
28.
Hakim, C. (1993). Segregated and integrated occupations: A new approach to analysing social change. European Sociological Review, 9, 289-314.
29.
Huinink, J. (1995). Warum noch Familie? Zur Attraktivität von Partnerschaft und Elternschaft in unserer Gesellschaft [Why still family? On the attractiveness of partnership and parenthood in our society]. Frankfurt A.M./New York: Campus.
30.
Hultin, M. (2003). Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Career consequences of occupational sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 30, 30-61.
31.
International Labour Organisation. (1990). International standard classification of occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
32.
Jacobs, J. A. (1989). Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women’s careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Jacobs, J. A., & Steinberg, R. J. (1995). Further evidence on compensating differentials and the gender gap in wages. In J. A. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender inequality at work (pp. 93-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Krüger, H. (2001). Ungleichheit und Lebenslauf: Wege aus den Sackgassen empirischer Traditionen [Inequality and the life course: Ways out of dead ends in empirical traditions]. In B. Heintz (Ed.), Geschlechtersoziologie [Sociology of gender], Sonderheft 41 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (pp. 512-537). Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
35.
Li, J. H., Buchmann, M., König, M., & Sacchi, S. (1998). Patterns of mobility for women in female dominated occupations: An event-history analysis of two birth cohorts of Swiss women. European Sociological Review, 14, 49-67.
36.
Marini, M. M., & Brinton, M. C. (1984). Sex-typing in occupational socialization. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace (pp. 192-232). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37.
Nickel, H. M. (1993). Women in the German Democratic Republic: Looking backward and forward (five theses). In N. Funk & M. Mueller (Eds.), Gender politics and post-Communism (pp. 138-150). New York: Routledge.
38.
Okamoto, D., & England, P. (1999). Is there a supply side to occupational sex segregation? Sociological Perspectives, 42, 557-582.
39.
Ostner, I. (1993). Slow motion: Women, work and the family in Germany. In J. Lewis (Ed.), Women and social policies in Europe: Work, family and the state (pp. 92-115). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
40.
Peterson, R. R. (1989). Firm size, occupational segregation, and the effects of family status on women’s wages. Social Forces, 68, 397-414.
41.
Polachek, S. (1981). Occupational self-selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 60-69.
42.
Polachek, S. (1985). Occupational segregation: A defense of human capital predictions. Journal of Human Resources, 20, 437-440.
43.
Reskin, B. F. (1988). Bringing the men back in: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women’s work. Gender and Society, 2, 58-81.
44.
Roos, P. A. (1985). Gender and work: A comparative analysis of industrial societies. New York: SUNY Press.
45.
Rosenfeld, R. A., & Spenner, K. (1995). Occupational sex segregation and women’s early career job shifts. In J. A. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender inequality at work (pp. 231-258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Rosenfeld, R. A., & Trappe, H. (2002). Occupational sex segregation in state socialist and market economies: Levels, patterns and change in East and West Germany, 1980s and 1998. In K. T. Leicht (Ed.), The future of market transition: Vol. 19. Of Research in Social Stratification and Mobility (pp. 231-267). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
47.
Rudd, E. (2000). Reconceptualizing gender in postsocialist transformation. Gender and Society, 14, 517-539.
48.
Rytina, N., & Bianchi, S. (1984). Occupational reclassification and changes in distribution by gender. Monthly Labor Review, 107, 11-17.
49.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1996). The PHREG Procedure. In SAS Institute, Inc., SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.11 (pp. 809-884). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
50.
Siltanen, J. (1994). Locating gender. Occupational segregation, wages and domestic responsibilities. London: UCL Press.
51.
Solga, H., & Konietzka, D. (1999). Occupational matching and social stratification: Theoretical insights and empirical observations taken from a German-German comparison. European Sociological Review, 15, 25-47.
52.
Solga, H., & Konietzka, D. (2000). Das Berufsprinzip des deutschen Arbeitsmarktes: Ein geschlechtsneutraler Allokations mechanismus? [The occupational principle in the German labor market: A gender-neutral allocation mechanism?]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 26, 111-147.
53.
Statistisches Amt der DDR (Ed.). (1990). Statistisches Jahrbuch der DDR‘90 [Statistical yearbook of the GDR ‘90]. Berlin, Germany: Rudolf Haufe Verlag.
54.
Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press.
55.
Trappe, H. (1996). Work and family in women’s lives in the German Democratic Republic. Work and Occupations, 23, 354-377.
56.
Trappe, H., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1998). A comparison of job-shifting patterns in the former East Germany and the former West Germany. European Sociological Review, 14, 343-368.
57.
Trappe, H., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2000). How do children matter? A comparison of gender earnings inequality for young adults in the former East Germany and the former West Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 489-507.
