This study investigates how several dimensions of gender, including an individual's sex, gender ideology, and the gender composition of an occupation, influence the accommodations people make in reconciling employment and family life. Using data from the 1996 General Social Survey, we find that women and men sometimes make different kinds of job-family trade-offs, that people in male-dominated occupations make more family trade-offs and fewer employment trade-offs than people in other occupations, and that individual gender attitudes have little effect on job-family trade-offs. Our findings illustrate how gender, as an embedded social institution, contributes to the clash between employment and family responsibilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, J.
(1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4: 139-158.
2.
Acker, J.
(1992). The future of women and work: Ending the twentieth century. Sociological Perspectives, 35, 53-68.
3.
Aronson, P.
(1999). The balancing act: Young women's expectations and experiences of work and family. Research in the Sociology of Work, 7, 55-83.
4.
Barnett, R. C.
, & Gareis, K. C. (2000). Reduced-hours employment: The relationship between difficulty of trade-offs and quality of life. Work and Occupations, 27, 168-187.
5.
Becker, G.
(1964). Human capital. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
Bielby, W. T.
, & Baron, J. N. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759-799.
7.
Blau, F. D.
, & Ferber, M. A. (1992). The economics of women, men, and work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Bond, J. T.
, Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. E. (1998). The 1997 national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.
9.
Brayfield, A.
(1992). Employment resources and housework in Canada. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 19-30.
10.
Brayfield, A.
(1995). Juggling jobs and kids: The impact of employment schedules on fathers' caring for children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 321-332.
11.
Bruce, W.
, & Reed, C. (1994). Preparing supervisors for the future work force: The dual-income couple and the job-family dichotomy. Public Administration Review, 54, 36-43.
12.
Burstein, P.
, & Bricher, M. (1997). Problem definition and public policy: Congressional committees confront work, family, and gender, 1945-1990. Social Forces, 75, 135-169.
13.
Carlisle, W.
(1994). Sharing home responsibilities: Women in dual-career marriages. In C. W. Konek & S. L. Kitch (Eds.), Women and careers: Issues and challenges (pp. 141-152). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Casey, J. C.
, & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (1994). Employed single mothers: Balancing job and homelife. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 9, 37-53.
15.
Cassidy, M. L.
, & Warren, B.O. (1996). Family employment status and gender role attitudes: A comparison of women and men college graduates. Gender & Society, 10, 312-329.
16.
Clinton, A.
(1997). Flexible labor: Restructuring the American work force. Monthly Labor Review, 120(8), 3-27.
17.
Cox, A. G.
, & Presser, H. B. (2000). Nonstandard employment schedules among American mothers. In T. L. Parcel & D. B. Cornfield (Eds.), Work & family: Research informing policy (pp. 97-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Davies-Netzley, S. A.
(1998). Women above the glass ceiling: Perceptions on corporate mobility and strategies for success. Gender & Society, 12, 339-355.
19.
Davis, J. A.
, & Smith, T. W. (1996). General Social Surveys, 1972-1996: Cumulative codebook (machine-readable data file). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
20.
Estes, S. B.
, & Glass, J. L. (1996). Job changes following childbirth: Are women trading compensation for family-responsive work conditions?Work and Occupations, 23, 405-436.
21.
Franklin, S. T.
, Ames, B. D., & King, S. (1994). Acquiring the family eldercare role. Research on Aging, 16, 27-42.
22.
Fried, M.
(1998). Taking time: Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
Frone, M. R.
, Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the job-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65-78.
24.
Gerson, K.
(1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Gerson, K.
(1998). Gender and the future of the family: Implications for the postindustrial work-place. In D. Vannoy & P. J. Dubeck (Eds.), Challenges for work and family in the twenty-first century (pp. 11-21). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
26.
Gerstel, N.
, & McGonagle, K. (1999). Job leaves and the limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act. Work and Occupations, 26, 510-534.
27.
Gibeau, J. L.
, & Anastas, J. W. (1989). Breadwinners and caregivers: Interviews with working women. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 14, 19-40.
28.
Glass, J.
(1990). The impact of occupational segregation on working conditions. Social Forces, 68, 779-796.
29.
Glass, J.
, & Estes, S. B. (1997). The family responsive workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 289-313.
30.
Glass, J.
, & Fujimoto, T. (1995). Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies. Work and Occupations, 22, 381-411.
31.
Googins, B. K.
(1997). Introduction. In T. A. Lilly, M. Pitt-Catsouphes, & B. K. Googins (Eds.), Work-family research: An annotated bibliography (pp. xiii-xviii). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
32.
Grief, G. L.
, Demaris, A., & Hood, J. C. (1993). Balancing work and single fatherhood. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 176-194). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Grimm, J. W.
, & Stern, R. N. (1974). Sex roles and internal labor market structures: The “female” semi-professions. Social Problems, 21, 690-705.
34.
Gutek, B. A.
, Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.
35.
Hertz, R.
(1997). A typology of approaches to child care: The centerpieces of organizing life for dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 355-385.
36.
Hinze, S. W.
(2000). Inside medical marriages: The effect of gender on income. Work and Occupations, 27, 464-499.
37.
Hochschild, A. R.
(1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.
38.
Hochschild, A. R.
(1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
39.
Jacobs, J. A.
, & Steinberg, R. J. (1990). Compensating differentials and the male-female wage gap: Evidence from the New York State comparable worth study. Social Forces, 69, 439-468.
40.
Jurik, N. C.
(1998). Getting away and getting by: The experiences of self-employed homeworkers. Work and Occupations, 25, 7-35.
41.
Kelly, E. L.
(1999). Theorizing corporate family policies: How advocates built “the business case” for “family-friendly” programs. Research in the Sociology of Work, 7, 169-202.
42.
Kmec, J. A.
(1999). Multiple aspects of work-family conflict. Sociological Focus, 32, 265-285.
43.
Kozimer-King, M.
, & Leicht, K. T. (1999). Sources of convergence and divergence in attitudes about work and family roles among women. Research in the Sociology of Work, 7, 85-108.
44.
Lorber, J.
(1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
MacDermid, S. M.
, Williams, M., Marks, S., & Heilbrun, G. (1994). Is small beautiful? Work-family tension, work conditions, and organizational size. Family Relations, 43, 159-167.
46.
Martin, P. Y.
, Seymour, S., Courage, M., Godbey, K., & Tate, R. (1988). Work-family policies: Corporate, union, feminist, and pro-family leaders' views. Gender & Society, 2, 385-400.
47.
Milkie, M. A.
, & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 476-490.
48.
Mincer, J.
, & Polacheck, S. W. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy, 82(Supp.), S76-S108.
49.
Parasuraman, S.
, & Greenhaus, J. H. (1997). The changing world of work and family. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 3-14). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
50.
Parker, R. N.
, & Fenwick, R. (1983). The Pareto curve and its utility for open-ended income distributions in survey research. Social Forces, 76, 301-332.
51.
Perlow, L. A.
(1995). Putting the work back into work/family. Group & Organization Management, 20, 227-239.
52.
Potuchek, J. L.
(1997). Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dual-earner marriages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53.
Powell, G. N.
(1997). The sex difference in employee inclinations regarding work-family programs: Why does it exist, should we care, and what should be done about it (if anything)? In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 167-174). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
54.
Presser, H. B.
(1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348-364.
55.
Reskin, B.
(1993). Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 241-270.
56.
Reskin, B.
, & Padavic, I. (1994). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
57.
Rice, T. W.
, & Coates, D. L. (1995). Gender role attitudes in the southern United States. Gender & Society, 9, 744-756.
58.
Richardson, M. S.
(1981). Occupational and family roles: A neglected intersection. Counseling Psychologist, 9, 13-23.
59.
Risman, B. J.
(1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
Risman, B. J.
, & Johnson-Sumerford, D. (1998). Doing it fairly: A study of postgender marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 23-40.
61.
Robinson, J. P.
, & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
62.
Robinson, J. P.
, & Milkie, M. A. (1998). Back to the basics: Trends in and role determinants of women's attitudes toward housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 205-218.
63.
Rones, P. L.
, Ilg, R. E., & Gardner, J. M. (1997). Trends in hour of work since the mid-1970s. Monthly Labor Review, 120(4), 3-14.
64.
Rubin, B. A.
(1995). Flexible accumulation: The decline of contract and social transformation. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 14, 297-323.
65.
Rubin, B. A.
(1996). Shifts in the social contract: Understanding change in American society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
66.
Rubin, L. B.
(1994). Families on the fault line: America's working class speaks about the family, the economy, race, and ethnicity. New York: HarperCollins.
67.
Sanchez, L.
, & Thomson, L. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747-772.
68.
Sandberg, J. C.
(1999). The effects of family obligations and workplace resources on men's and women's use of family leaves. Research in the Sociology of Work, 7, 261-281.
69.
Sandberg, J. C.
, & Cornfield, D. B. (2000). Returning to work: The impact of gender, family, and work on terminating a family or medical leave. In T. L. Parcel & D. B. Cornfield (Eds.), Work & family: Research informing policy (pp. 161-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
Schor, J. B.
(1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.
71.
Seron, C.
, & Ferris, K. (1995). Negotiating professionalism: The gendered social capital of flexible time. Work and Occupations, 22, 22-47.
72.
Shelton, B. A.
(1992). Women, men and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. New York: Greenwood.
73.
Smith, V.
(1993). Flexibility in work and employment: The impact on women. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 11, 195-216.
74.
South, S. J.
, & Spitz, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347.
75.
Thompson, L.
, & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871.
76.
Thorne, B.
(1987). Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children?Gender & Society, 1, 85-109.
77.
Thornton, A.
(1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 873-893.
78.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1998). Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor. Retrieved March 27, 1998, from ftp://146.142.4.23/pub/special.requests/fl/AA96/aat11.txt at http://stats.bls.gov.datahome.htm
79.
Wharton, C. S.
(1994). Finding time for the “second shift”: The impact of flexible work schedules on women's double days. Gender & Society, 8, 189-205.
80.
Williams, D. R.
(1995). Women's part-time employment: A gross flows analysis. Monthly Labor Review, 118(4), 36-44.
