The article analyzes the reasons behind the persistent invisibility of class discrimination in social life and social science. Unlike gender and race, social class is not readily visible, clearly bounded and its boundaries agreed upon; membership can change and is not officialized by the state; position is perceived as a flexible and meritocratic; plus the social sciences have failed to develop a properly analytic concept of discrimination. I illustrate my argument with field observation of a California criminal court in which bias based on class is pervasive and overt, yet unseen and affirmed by judges, prosecutors and defence attorneys.
BeckerG (1957) The Economics of Discrimination, (2nd edition 1971). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BourdieuP (1979) La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement [Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste]. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
3.
BourdieuP (2014) Sociologie générale, vol 1: Cours au Collège de France 1981−1983 [General Sociology, vol 1: Course at the Collège de France 1981−1983]. Paris: Raisons d’agir Éditions and Seuil. [In French.]
4.
BrubakerR (2016) Trans: Gender and Race in an Age of Unsettled Identities.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
CentersR (1949) The Psychology of Social Classes.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
FeeleyM (1979) The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
HirschmanA (1972) Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
JackmanMRJackmanRW (1983) Class Awareness in the United States.Berkeley: University of California Press.
PhelpsES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review62(4): 659–661.
11.
RoedigerDR (2019) How Race Survived U.S. History: From Settlement and Slavery to the Twenty-First Century. New York: Verso, revised and expanded edition.
12.
RossD (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
RubinA (2025) Normativity is not a replacement for theory. Theory & Society 54(5): 795−850.
14.
SampsonRJ (2025) Frontiers of research on racial inequalities in criminal justice. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences11(3): 1–21.
15.
SchoenfeldHWalkerCRosaM (2025) Criminal justice as racialized organizations: Evidence from ethnographies of police, courts, and jails. Criminology63(1): 122–154.
16.
SombartW (1913) Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? [Why is there no socialism in the United States?] Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik7: 6-126. [In German.]
17.
StuartF (2016) Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
TuğalC (2021) Populism studies: The case for theoretical and comparative reconstruction. Annual Review of Sociology47(2021): 327–347.
