The article examines the interconnection between Lukács' analysis of labour as teleological positing in his late social ontology and his interpretation of Hegel's philosophy. It argues that Lukács' reading of Hegel's Logic, particularly his emphasis on the doctrine of essence, prioritizes the goal and cognitive aspects of subjectivity in his analysis of labour. By reconstructing the core aspects of Lukács' analysis of labour, the article highlights how this ontological priority of teleological positing stems from the modality of categorial relations in the doctrine of essence to which Lukács is committed. In doing so, it draws attention to both methodological inconsistencies in his analysis of labour and its crucial insights, while stressing the absence of a more speculative−dialectical presentation that could frame labour in more dynamic terms. The article thus underscores the great importance of the late Lukács' unfinished social ontology for debates on the dialectical method and critical theory.
AbazariA (2017) Opposition instead of recognition: The social significance of “determinations of reflection” in Hegel’s Science of Logic. Philosophy and Social Criticism44(3): 253–277..
2.
AndersonK (2016) Marx's at the Margins. On Nationalism, Ethnicity and Non-Western Societies. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
ArthurCH (2022) The Spectre of Capital: Idea and Reality. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
4.
BrowneP (1990) Lukács’ later ontology. Science & Society54(2): 193–218..
5.
CarlsonDG (2007) A Commentary to Hegel’s Science of Logic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
DüsingΚ (2012) Aufhebung der Tradition im dialektischen Denken. Untersuchungen zu Hegels Logik, Ethik und Ästhetik [Abolition of Tradition in Dialectical Thought. Investigations into Hegel’s Logic, Ethics, and Aesthetics]. München: Wilhelm Fink. [In German.]
7.
EngelsF (1987) Letter to Albert Lange, 29 march 1865. In: MarxKEngelsF (eds) Collected Works. Vol. 42. New York: International Publishers, 135–138.
8.
FehérFHellerAMarkusG, et al. (1976) Notes on Lukács’ Ontology. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary29(1): 160–181..
9.
ForczekA (2024) The post festum-rationality of history in Georg Lukács’ Ontology. Studies in East European Thought76(2): 177–192.
10.
FuchsC (2015) Georg Lukács as a communications scholar: Cultural and digital labour in the context of Lukács’ ontology of social being. Media, Culture & Society38(4): 506–524..
11.
GiesbertA (2020) The ontology of alienation: Lukács’ normative theory of history. In: ThompsonMJ (ed.) Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 116–151.
12.
HegelGWF (1977) Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by AV Miller with analysis of the Text and Foreword by JN Findlay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
HegelGWF (2008) Lectures on Logic. Berlin 1831, Translated by C Butler.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14.
HegelGWF (2010a) [1817]Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part 1, Science of Logic. Translated by Klaus Brinkmann and Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
HegelGWF (2010b) The Science of Logic. Translated by G di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HonnethA (2014) Foreword. In: JaeggiR (ed.) Alienation. New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press.vii-x.
18.
HoulgateST (2005) Why Hegel’s concept is not the essence of things. In: CarlsonDG (ed.) Hegel’s Theory of the Subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 19–29.
19.
InfrancaAVeddaM (2020) Ontology and labor in Lukács’ late thought. In: ThompsonMJ (ed.) Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 13–27.
20.
KalatzisA (2017) Faraway, So Close: Skepticism, subjective idealism and the problem of Shine in Hegel's Science of Logic. In: Faraklas G and Kozatsas J (eds) Hegel and Skepticism. Hegel-Jahrbuch Sonderband, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1242/10.1515/9783110528138-007
21.
KavoulakosK (2017) Lukács’ theory of reification and the tradition of critical theory. In: ThompsonM (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 67–85.
22.
KavoulakosK (2018) Georg Lukács’s Philosophy of Praxis: From Neo-Kantianism to Marxism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
23.
KavoulakosK (2020) What is reification in Georg Lukács’s early Marxist work?Thesis Eleven157(1): 41–59.
LukácsG (1975) The Young Hegel. London: Merlin Press.
26.
LukácsG (1978) The Ontology of Social Being. 1. Hegel. London: The Merlin Press.
27.
LukácsG (1980) The Ontology of Social Being. 3. Labour. London: The Merlin Press.
28.
LukácsG (1983) Record of a Life. London: Verso.
29.
LukácsG (1984) Prolegomena. Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins. 1. Halbband [Prolegomena. On the Ontology of Social Being. Volume 1]. Darmstadt und Neuwied: Luchterhand. [In German.]
30.
LukácsG (1986) Zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins. 2. Halbband [On the Ontology of Social Being. Volume 2]. Darmstadt und Neuwied: Luchterhand. [In German.]
31.
LukácsG (2015) Les fondements ontologiques de la pensée et de l’agir humains, Conférence pour le 4e congrès international de philosophie [The Ontological Foundations of Human Thought and Action, Conference for the 4th International Congress of Philosophy]. HAL Id: hal-01180344 https://hal-univ-tlse2.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01180344. [In French.]
32.
LukácsG (2023) The Specificity of the Aesthetic. Leiden: Boston: Brill.
33.
MaraguatE (2023) Hegel’s case for means and ends: The logic of ‘teleology.’. Hegel Bulletin44(1): 127–147..
34.
MarcuseH (1987) Hegel’s Ontology and the Theory of Historicity. Translated by S. Benhabib. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
35.
MarxK (1973) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by M. Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
36.
MarxK (1976) Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1. Translated by B. Fowkes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
37.
MeaneyM (2002) Capital as Organic Unity. Dordrecht, London: Springer Science & Business Media.
38.
MenozziF (2022) Reading Hegel after Marx: Lukács and the question of teleology. International Critical Thought12(1): 98–115.
39.
MészárosI (1972) Lukács’s Concept of Dialectic. London: Merlin.
40.
MillerEP (2021) Hegel on reflection and reflective judgement. Hegel Bulletin42(2): 201–226..
41.
MoseleyFSmithT (eds) (2014) Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
42.
NesbittN (2024) Reading Capital’s Materialist Dialectic. Marx, Spinoza, and the Althusserians. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
43.
NinosG (2023) Rethinking dialectic in the 21st century: Interpretation, method and scientific inquiry. Critique51(2–3): 363–379.
44.
NinosG (2024) Hegel’s theory of finite cognition and Marx’s critique of political economy. Hegel Bulletin: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2024.22.
45.
NuzzoA (2020) Method in Hegel’s dialectic−speculative logic. In: BykovaMFWestphalKR (eds) The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 151–166.
46.
PavlidisP (2010) Critical thinking as dialectics: A Hegelian–Marxist approach. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies8(2): 74–102.
47.
PotamiasS (2024) The Hegelian master-slave dialectic in history and class consiousness. Open Philosophy7(1). DOI: 10.1515/opphil-2024-0012.
48.
ReutenG (2024) Essays on Marx’s Capital; Summaries, Appreciations and Reconstructions. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
49.
RockmoreT (1988) Lukács on modern philosophy. In: RockmoreT (ed.) Lukács Today. Essays in Marxist Philosophy. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 221–241.
50.
ShafaiF (1996) The Ontology of Georg Lukács: Studies in Materialist Dialectics. Aldershot: Avebury.
51.
SkomvoulisM (2020) Lukács’ late appropriation of Hegel’s philosophy: The ontology of materialist dialectics and the complexities of labor as teleological positing. In: ThompsonMJ (ed.) Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 152–179.
52.
SmetonaMJ (2020) Lukács’ ontology of social being and the material basis of intentionality. In: ThompsonMJ (ed.) Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 41–77.
53.
SmetonaMJ (2023) Recovering the Later Lukács. A Study on the Unity of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
SmithT (1990) The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. Albany, NY: State University Of New York Press.
55.
TertulianN (1979) On the later Lukács. Telos1979(40): 136–144.
56.
TertulianN (1988) Lukács ontology. In: RockmoreT (ed.) Lukács Today. Essays in Marxist Philosophy. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 243–273.
57.
TertulianN (2011) Introduction. In: LukacsG (ed.) Ontologie de l’être social. Le travail, La reproduction [Ontology of social being. Work, reproduction]. Paris: Editions Delga, 5–49. [In French.]
58.
ThompsonM (ed.) (2020) Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
59.
ThompsonM (2020) Marx, Lukács and the groundwork for critical social ontology. In: Thompson GeorgM (ed.) Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 419–455.
60.
ToselA (2008) The late Lukács and the Budapest School. In: BidetJKouvelakisS (eds) Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism. Leiden: Brill, 163–173.
61.
TuchanskaBŚwiderskiEM (1991) Marxism as the foundation of philosophies of science: The case of G. Lukács’ Ontology of Social Being. Studies in Soviet Thought41(1): 1–17.
62.
VazjulinV (2006) Die Logik ‘Des Kapitals’ von Karl Marx [The Logic of Capital by Karl Marx]. Norderstedt: Books On Demand GmbH. [In German.]
63.
VazjulinV (2011) Die Logik der Geschichte: Frage der Theorie und Methode [The Logic of History: A Question of Theory and Method]. Norderstedt: Books on Demand GmbH.
