There has been a backlash against academic writing in the humanities that can be found in popular culture at least since the 1990s. By considering a selection of arguments from critics of academic writing in the humanities, I then defend a certain kind of ‘obscurity’ or ‘difficulty’ in scholarly prose by developing a concise genealogy of obscure academic writing. This paper develops the notion that an ‘uncommon sense’ should be situated against ‘common sense’ to unveil an assumed ‘world’ or ‘reality’ alongside the structural formations of that which is considered ‘useful’ language. Often, complicated academic language grapples with the intrinsic complexity that is hidden behind ‘simple’ ideas.
CullerJLambK (2003) Introduction: Dressing up, dressing down. In: CullerJLambK (eds) Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
13.
CussetF (2008 [2003]) French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States. Eds. Fort J, Berganza J and Jones M. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
DeLandaM (2009) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.
15.
DerridaJ (1978 [1967]) Writing and Difference. Trans. Bass A. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
EubanksPSchaefferJD (2008) A kind word for bullshit: The problem of academic writing. CCC59(3): 372–388.
17.
FergusonM (2003) Difficult style and ‘illustrious’ vernaculars: A historical perspective. In: CullerJLambK (eds) Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 15–28.
GaffneyP (2010) The Force of the Virtual: Deleuze, Science, and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
GlazebrookT (2012) Heidegger on Science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
Gorgias (2009) In: WaterfieldR (ed) The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and Sophists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 222–240.
22.
GraffGBirkensteinC (2007) They Say, I Say: The Moves that Matter in Persuasive Writing. New York: Norton.
23.
HegelGWF (1959) Hegel’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Trans. Mueller GE. New York: Philosophical Library.
24.
HorkheimerMAdornoTW (1989 [1944]) Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. and ed. Cumming J. New York: Continuum.
25.
JamesonF (1971) Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
JamesonF (1982) The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27.
JohnsonB (2003) Bad writing. In: CullerJLambK (eds) Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 157–168.
28.
JohnstoneMA (2014) On ‘Logos’ in Heraclitus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy47: 1–29.
KilcreaseB (2021) Falsehood and Fallacy: How to Think, Read, and Write in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31.
LacanJ (1980) Monsieur A. (Mr. A) Ornicar?21–22: 17.
32.
LacanJ (2001 [1977]) Peut-être à Vincennes…. (Maybe in Vincennes....) In: MillerJ-A (ed.) Autre écrits. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 313–315.
33.
LacanJ (2017 [2011]) Talking to Brick Walls: A Series of Presentations in the Chapel at Sainte-Anne Hospital. Trans. Price AR. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
LeahyDG (1996) Foundation: Matter the Body Itself. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
LewkowichD (2017) Notes from the field. McGill Journal of Education52(1): 207–215.
36.
LiebermanJK (2004) Bad writing: Some thoughts on the abuse of scholarly rhetoric. New York Law School Law Review49: 649–664.
37.
LuhmannN (2013 [2002]) Introduction to Systems Theory. Eds. Baecker D and Gilgen P. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
McCloskeyDN (2000) Economical Writing. Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.
39.
McCumberJ (2003) The metaphysics of clarity and the freedom of meaning. In: CullerJLambK (eds) Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 58–71.
40.
McGranahanC (2020) Writing Anthropology: Essays on Craft and Commitment. Durham: Duke University Press.
41.
MillerJ (2000) Is Bad Writing Necessary?: George Orwell, Theodor Adorno, and the Politics of Literature. Lingua Franca9(9): 12–18.
NewmanW (2006) Atoms and Alchemy: Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
OrwellG (1968 [1946) Politics and the English language. In: OrwellSAngusI (eds) The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell: Volume IV: In Front of Your Nose 1945–1950. London: Secker & Warburg, 127–140.
45.
Parmenides of Elea (1991) Fragments: A Text and Translation. Trans. Gallop D. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
SchopenhauerA (2000a [1851]) Parerga and Paralipomena: Short Philosophical Essays, Volume One. Ed. Payne EFJ. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
55.
SchopenhauerA (2000b [1851]) Parerga and Paralipomena: Short Philosophical Essays, Volume Two. Ed. Payne EFJ. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
56.
SchopenhauerA (2012 [1836]) In: (eds) On Will in Nature, in On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings. Ed. CartwrightDEErdmannEEJanawayC.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
