In this paper I want to leave behind the failed attempts to think about populism as ideology, strategy, style, or even discourse. I will focus on the ‘conceptual battles of politics’ and their potential to influence actors to pursue and effect specific ends. Reinhart Koselleck and his ideas about conceptual history will figure prominently in my discussion, as will his concept of asymmetrical combat-concept as a means of unleashing a theoretical and political war. The goal is to demonstrate that concepts have taken the place of weapons of war among political actors.
D’EramoM (2017) Review of ‘Jan-Werner Müller, What is Populism?’ The New Left Review103: 129–138.
7.
ErrejónIMouffeC (2015) Construir Pueblo: Hegemonía y radicalización de la democracia. Madrid: Icaria.
8.
FerraraA (2008) The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
FraserN (2017) American interregnum: From progressive neoliberalism to Trump and beyond. American Affairs4(1): 46–64.
10.
FraserNJaeggiR (2018) Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. London: Polity.
11.
HabermasJ (1995) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Burger T and Lawrence F. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. Rehg W. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
HabermasJ (2015) The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
HartogF (2017) Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time, trans. Brown S. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
HawkinsK (2009) Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies8: 1040–1067.
16.
JudisJ (2016) The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.
17.
KazinM (1995) The Populist Persuasion. An American History. New York: Cornell University Press.
18.
KoselleckR (1985) Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans. Tribe K. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
KoselleckR (1988) Critique and Crisis. Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
KoselleckR (2007) Crítica y Crisis. Un Estudio sobre la patogénesis del mundo burgués, trans. Vega R and Pérez Tudela J. Madrid: Trotta.
21.
LaclauE (2005a) On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
22.
LaclauE (2005b) Populism: What’s in a name? In: PanizzaF (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. New York: Verso, 32–49.
23.
LaraMP (2007) Narrating Evil: A Postmetaphysical Theory of Reflexive Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
LaraMP (2013) The Disclosure of Politics: Struggles Over the Semantics of Secularization. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
LaraMP (forthcoming) Semantic contents. In: AllenAMendietaE (eds) The Habermas Lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
LefortC (2006) The permanence of the theologico-political. In: VriesHDSullivanLE (eds) Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World. New York: Fordham, 148–187.
27.
LipsetSM (2017) The sources of radical right. In: BellD (ed.) The Radical Right. New York: Routledge, 259–312.
28.
MoffittB (2006) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
MouffeC (2007) En torno a lo politico, trans. Laclau S. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
30.
MouffeC (2018) For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
31.
MoynS (2010) The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
32.
MüllerJW (2016) What Is Populism?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
33.
PanizzaF (ed.) (2005) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. New York: Verso.
