This article explores some of the concerns which are being raised about algorithms with recourse to Habermas’s theory of communicative action. The intention is not to undertake an empirical examination of ‘algorithms’ or their consequences but to connect critical theory to some contemporary concerns regarding digital cultures. Habermas’s ‘colonization of life-worlds’ thesis gives theoretical expression to two different trends which underlie many current criticisms of the insidious influence of digital algorithms: the privatization of communication, and the particularization of knowledge and experience. Habermas’s social theory therefore offers a useful framework for exploring some of the normative and political problems that are attributed to ‘algorithmic culture’ and ‘big data’.
AndrejevicMHearnAKennedyH (2015) Cultural studies of data mining: Introduction. European Journal of Cultural Studies18(4–5): 379–394.
2.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
3.
BoxellLGentzkowMShapiroJM (2017) Is the Internet Causing Political Polarization? Evidence from Demographics. 23258, Working Paper, March. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: 10.3386/w23258.
4.
boyd d and Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 662–679.
5.
BradyWJWillsJAJostJT. (2017) Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(28): 7313–7318.
6.
BratichJZ (2005) Amassing the multitude: Revisiting early audience studies. Communication Theory15(3): 242–265.
7.
CorsiG (2017) Legitimating reason or self-created uncertainty? Public opinion as an observer of modern politics. Thesis Eleven143(1): 44–55.
8.
CurranJ (1993) Rethinking the media as a public sphere. In: DahlgrenPSparksC (eds) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge, pp. 27–56.
9.
DahlbergL (2005) The corporate colonization of online attention and the marginalization of critical communication?Journal of Communication Inquiry29(2): 160–180.
10.
DavisK (2008) Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory9(1): 67–85.
11.
DavisM (2015) E-books in the global information economy. European Journal of Cultural Studies18(4–5): 514–529.
12.
FraserN (2015) Legitimation crisis? On the political contradictions of financialized capitalism. Critical Historical Studies2(2): 157–189.
13.
FuchsC (2014) Social media and the public sphere. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique12(1): 57–101.
HabermasJ (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
16.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
HabermasJ (2006) Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory16(4): 411–426.
18.
HofstadterD (2008) I Am a Strange Loop. New York: Basic Books.
19.
JenkinsH (2006) Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: NYU Press.
20.
KennedyH (2012) Perspectives on sentiment analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(4): 435–450.
21.
KennedyHMossG (2015) Known or knowing publics? Social media data mining and the question of public agency. Big Data & Society2(2): 1–11.
22.
KnodtE (1994) Toward a non-foundationalist epistemology: The Habermas/Luhmann controversy revisited. New German Critique61: 77–100.
23.
KrayTR (2018) More dialectical than the dialectic: Exemplarity in Theodor W. Adorno’s ‘The Essay as Form’. Thesis Eleven144(1): 30–45.
24.
LuhmannN (2012) Theory of Society, Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
McLuhanM (1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
26.
O’ConnellA (2016) My entire life is online: Informed consent, big data, and decolonial knowledge. Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice5(1): 68–93.
27.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
28.
ShirkyC (2011) The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs90(1): 28–41.
29.
SlaterMD (2007) Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory17(3): 281–303.
30.
StriphasT (2015) Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies18(4–5): 395–412.
