The main goal of this paper is to offer a reading of Reinhart Koselleck’s work as an ally of critical theory. My contention is that, despite customary accusations of Koselleck being an anti-Enlightenment historian detrimental to social criticism and emancipatory politics, his investigations on the semantic fabric of modern society may actually expand our resources for the critique of domination. In order to make this argument plausible, I reconstruct some antinomies that are at the basis of Koselleck’s work (state/society, language/reality, experience/expectation) and discuss their critical potential. This analysis shows that, rather than a rejection of the spirit of critique, Koselleck contributes to the temporalization of the practice of critique as such: namely, a clarification of the contradictions and potentials of a reflexive practice imbued in the struggle between the need to comprehend the world as it is and the right to experiment with other forms of life.
AdornoTHorkheimerM (1997) The Dialectic of the Enlightenment. London: Verso.
3.
AllenA (2015) The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
BrunkhorstH (2003) Crisis. In: OuthwaiteW (ed.) The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought. London: Blackwell, 130–133.
5.
BrunkhorstH (2014) Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
6.
Bustamante KuschelG (2015) Duso’s critique of political philosophy: From methodology to a postmodern retrieval of democracy. Constellations. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12187.
7.
CohenJAratoA (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
CookeM (2004) Redeeming redemption: The utopian dimension of critical social theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism30(4): 413–429.
9.
CorderoR (2017) Crisis and Critique: On the Fragile Foundations of Social Life. New York and London: Routledge.
10.
FillaferFL (2007) The Enlightenment on trial: Reinhart Koselleck’s interpretation of Aufklärung. In: WangQEFillaferFL (eds) The Many Faces of Clio: Cross-cultural Approaches to Historiography: Essays in Honor of Georg G. Iggers. Oxford: Berghahn Books, 322–345.
11.
FineR (1997) Civil society, enlightenment and critique. Democratization4(1): 7–28.
12.
FineR (2001) Political Investigations: Hegel, Marx, Arendt. London: Routledge.
13.
FosterR (2007) Adorno: The Recovery of Experience. New York: SUNY Press.
14.
GilbertA (2016) Conceptual histories and critical theories. Thesis Eleven132(1): 87–101.
15.
HabermasJ (1987) Zur Kritik an der Geschichtsphilosophie. In: HabermasJ, Philosophisch-politische Profile. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 435–444.
16.
HabermasJ (1992) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
HoffmannS (2010) Koselleck, Arendt, and the anthropology of historical experience. History and Theory49: 212–236.
18.
HohendahlP (1995) Recasting the public sphere. October73: 27–54.
19.
KolakowskiL (1990) The dead of utopia reconsidered. In: KolakowskiL, Modernity on Endless Trial. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 131–145.
20.
KoselleckR (1989) Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
KoselleckR (1996) A response to comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbergriffe. In: LehmannHRichterM (eds) The Meanings of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Washington, DC: German Historical Institute, 59–70.
22.
KoselleckR (1997) Temporalization of concepts. Redescriptions: Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought1: 16–24.
23.
KoselleckR (2001a) Cambio de experiencia y cambio de método. Un apunte histórico-antropológico [Change of experience and change of method. Historical-anthropological notes]. In: KoselleckR, Los estratos del tiempo: estudios sobre la historia. Barcelona: Paidós, 43–92.
24.
KoselleckR (2001b) Estratos del tiempo [Time strata]. In: KoselleckR, Los estratos del tiempo: estudios sobre la historia. Barcelona: Paidós, 35–42.
25.
KoselleckR (2002a) The temporalization of utopia. In: KoselleckR, The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 84–99.
26.
KoselleckR (2002b) Social history and conceptual history. In: KoselleckR, The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 20–37.
27.
KoselleckR (2002c) Concepts of historical time and social history. In: KoselleckR, The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 114–130.
28.
KoselleckR (2004a) Neuzeit: Remarks on the semantics of modern concepts of movement. In: KoselleckR, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 222–254.
29.
KoselleckR (2004b) Begriffsgeschichte and social history. In: KoselleckR, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 75–92.
30.
KoselleckR (2004c) ‘Space of experience’ and ‘horizon of expectation’: Two historical categories. In: KoselleckR, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 255–275.
31.
KoselleckR (2011) Introduction and Prefaces to the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Contributions to the History of Concepts6(1): 1–37.
32.
LaraMP (2013) The Disclosure of Politics: Struggles over the Semantics of Secularization. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
LöwithK (1995) From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
NietzscheF (2007) On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
NorbergJ (2014) Sociability and its Enemies: German Political Theory After 1945. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
36.
OlsenN (2012) History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York: Berghahn Books.
37.
PalonenK (2002) The history of concepts as a style of political theorizing: Quentin Skinner’s and Reinhart Koselleck’s subversion of normative political theory. European Journal of Political Theory1(1): 91–106.
38.
PaltiEJ (2011) Reinhart Koselleck: His concept of the concept and neo-Kantism. Contributions to the History of Concepts6(2): 1–20.
39.
PankakoskiT (2010) Conflicts, context, concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on concepts. Political Theory38(6): 749–779.
40.
RicoeurP (1990) Time and Narrative, Vol. 3. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
41.
RobergeJ (2011) What is critical hermeneutics?Thesis Eleven106(1): 5–22.
42.
RoseG (1992) The Broken Middle: Out of Our Ancient Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
ScheuermanW (2002) Unsolved paradoxes: Conservative political thought in Adenauer’s Germany. In: McCormickJ (ed.) Confronting Mass Democracy and Industrial Technology: Political and Social from Nietzsche to Habermas. Durham: Duke University Press, 221–244.
44.
StrydomP (2000) Discourse and Knowledge: The Making of Enlightenment Sociology. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
45.
TonelliG (1978) ‘Critique’ and related terms prior to Kant: A historical survey. Kant-Studien69(2): 119–148.
46.
WagnerP (2008) Modernity as Experience and Interpretation: A New Sociology of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
