Marxists should reconsider their usual attitude to universal human rights. On the Jewish Question did not reject the entire French Declaration of 1791. In 1843 Marx and Engels were close to Babouvism, the continuation of French rights. Nor was their view that the 1791 Declaration must be completed by economic and social rights; rather, their criticism concerned the reduction of universal rights to citizen rights because it left the state the final arbiter of justice, denying the ‘voice from below’. The source of human rights cannot be the state or its hegemonic rule of law. The article concludes that a politics of human rights would return justice to individuals and create a counter-hegemony.
Davidson, Alastair ( 2003) ‘Ciudadania y migracion: Derechos para aquellos sin pertenencia’, Anales de la catedra Francisco Suarez37: 35-57.
3.
Du Bois, W.E.B. ( 1973) The Correspondence of W. E. B. du Bois, Vol. 1, Selections 1877-1934, edited by Herbert Aptheker.Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
4.
Levinas, Emanuel ( 1976) Totalité et l’infini. Paris: Seuil
5.
Marx, Karl ( 1975) Collected Works, Vol. 3, 1843-44. London : Lawrence and Wishart.
6.
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich ( 1976) Collected Works. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
7.
Schoyen, Albert Robert ( 1957) The Chartist Challenge: A Portrait of George Julian Harney . London, Melbourne, Toronto: Heinemann.
8.
Todorov, Tzevtan ( 1999) The Conquest of the Americas: The Question of the Other . Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
