Theories of social capital are popular because they claim to insulate society against both the coercion of states and the individualism of markets, as well as to better explain social prosperity and economic performance. But in fact laws, citizenship rights, compulsory associations and political institutions do a much better job of the former, while large-scale civic movements, like Poland’s Solidarity, with demonstrable impacts on the configuration of political power, are the historic keys to democratic prosperity and social confidence.
Friedman, M. (1953) ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, in M. Friedman Essays in Positive Economics, pp. 1-43. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
2.
Heilbroner, R. and Milberg, W. (1995) The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Portes, A. (1998) ‘Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology’ , Annual Review of Sociology24(1): 1-24 .
4.
Putnam, R. D. (1993) ‘The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life’ , American Prospect13: 35-42 .
5.
Putnam, R. D. (1995) ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’ , Journal of Democracy6(1): 65-78 .
6.
Putnam, R. D. (1996) ‘The Strange Disappearance of Civic America’ , American Prospect24: 34-48 .
7.
Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster .
8.
Putnam, R. D. (2002) Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press .
9.
Putnam, R. D. , Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
10.
Skocpol, T. (2003) Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civil Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press .
11.
Somers, M. R. (1993) ‘Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy’ , American Sociological Review58(5): 587-620 .
12.
Somers, M. R. (1994) ‘Rights, Relationality, and Membership: Rethinking the Making and Meaning of Citizenship’ , Law and Social Inquiry19(1): 1301-1350 .
13.
Somers, M. R. (1999) ‘The Privatization of Citizenship: How to Unthink a Knowledge Culture’, in V. E. Bonnell and L. Hunt (eds) Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, pp. 121-126. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
14.
Somers, M. R. (2001) ‘Romancing the Market, Reviling the State: Historicizing Liberalism, Privatization, and the Competing Claims to Civil Society’, in C. Crouch , K. Eder and D. Tambini (eds) Citizenship, Markets, and the State, pp. 23-48. New York: Oxford University Press .
15.
Somers, M. R. and Block, F. (2005) ‘From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions over Two Centuriess of Welfare Debate’ , American Sociological Review70(2).
16.
Swedberg, R. (1990) Economics and Sociology: Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
