Reporting and Storytelling: Eichmann in Jerusalem as Political Testimony

Abstract

Commentaries on Eichmann in Jerusalem are of two kinds. The first confronts the historical relevance of Arendt's `report' and attempts to ascertain whether her ironical presentation of Eichmann's trial matches reality, namely, the incommensurable suffering of the Jewish people. The second focuses on the meaning of her expression `the banality of evil', and places Arendt in a long tradition of moral and political philosophy concerned with the problem of evil and, accordingly, of judging evil. The argument of this paper is that both paths of research miss Arendt's intention, and that her `report' has to be read in light of Walter Benjamin's conceptions of history and storytelling. On the one hand, Eichmann in Jerusalem was not intended to reflect reality objectively because, as Arendt claimed, the objectivity of scientific historiography may serve only to condone the genocide. Throughout her entire work, Arendt aimed at avoiding the neutrality of historicism, the `tradition of sine ira et studio', which, according to her, represents a renunciation of responsibility. On the other hand, Arendt emphasized that she did not attempt to write about the nature of evil but to faithfully describe a phenomenon. Therefore the questions to be answered are: What did Arendt mean by a `report'? What does it mean to describe Eichmann's trial non-objectively but faithfully? In this paper, I show that her report should be understood in the light of a new methodological experiment inherited from Benjamin, which can be broken down into two steps: 1. To reveal the truth of history in stories rather than seek historical `objectivity' through theories; and 2. To look at events from forgotten standpoints, which are assumed to represent the experienced `inside' of history.

Keywords

Arendt Benjamin historical truth standpoints storytelling testimony

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arendt, Hannah (1953) ` “A Reply” [to Eric Vogelin's review of Origins of Totalitarianism]', Review of Politics 15: 76-84.

Arendt, Hannah (1957) Rahel Varnhagen. The Life of a Jewess, trans. Richard and Clara Winston. London, Jerusalem, New York: East and West Library.

Arendt, Hannah (1960) `Action and the Pursuit of Happiness', lecture delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Library of Congress, MSS Box 61, 1.

Arendt, Hannah (1968) Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Arendt, Hannah (1977) The Life of the Mind. Thinking. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Arendt, Hannah (1978) The Jew as Pariah. New York: Grove Press.

Arendt, Hannah (1979) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Arendt, Hannah (1982) Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, Ronald Beiner (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, Hannah (1990) On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

10.

Hannah Arendt-Karl Jaspers Correspondence (1992) San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace (Correspondence A/J).

11.

Arendt, Hannah (1993) Between Past and Future. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

12.

Arendt, Hannah (1994) Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

13.

Barnouw, Dagmar (1990) Visible Spaces. Hannah Arendt and the German-Jewish Experience. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

14.

Benhabib, Seyla (1996) The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

15.

Benjamin, Walter (1969) Illuminations, Hannah Arendt (ed.). New York: Schocken Books.

16.

Between Friends. The Correspondence of Hannah Arendt and Mary McCarthy, Carol Brightman (ed.) (1995) New York: Harcourt Brace (Correspondence A/M).

17.

Bilsky, Leora Y. (1996) `When Actor and Spectator Meet in the Courtroom: Reflections on Hannah Arendt's Concept of Judgment', History and Memory 8: 137-173.

18.

Canovan, Margaret (1999) `Terrible Truths: Hannah Arendt on Politics, Contingency and Evil', Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2: 173-189.

19.

Disch, Lisa (1994) Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

20.

Felman, Shoshana and Dori Laub (1992) Testimony. Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York and London: Routledge.

21.

Ginzburg, Carlo (1992) `Just One Witness', in Saul Friedlander (ed.) Probing the Limits of Representation. Nazism and the `Final Solution'. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Herzog, Annabel (2000) `Illuminating Inheritance. Benjamin's Influence on Arendt's Political Storytelling', Philosophy and Social Criticism 26(5): 1-27.

23.

Ingram, David (1996) `Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Trial of (Post) Modernity or the Tale of Two Revolutions', in Larry May and Jerome Kohn (eds) Hannah Arendt. Twenty Years Later. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

24.

Kant, Immanuel (1951) Critique of Judgment, trans. J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner.

25.

Landes, Joan B (1995) `Novo Ordo Saeclorum: Gender and Public Space in Hannah Arendt's Revolutionary France', in Bonnie Honig (ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

26.

Ring, Jennifer (1998) The Political Consequences of Thinking. Gender and Judaism in the Work of Hannah Arendt. Albany: State University of New York Press.

27.

The Correspondence of Walter Benjamin and Gershom Scholem 1932-1940, Gershom Scholem (ed.). (1992) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Correspondence B/S).

28.

Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth (1977) `Hannah Arendt's Storytelling', Social Research 44: 183-190.