This essay discusses totalitarian theories with regard to their capacity to interpret in a normatively plausible way such different dictatorships as Nazism, Stalinism and post-Stalinism. In contrast to theoretical approaches which subsume all these regimes under a single concept (totalitarianism as total control), it argues in favor of discerning terror and ideology as main characteristics (totalitarianism as extermination). The focus on National Socialism and Stalinism needs further differentiation. Theories of bureaucratic structures and charismatic domination may help in distinguishing both regimes' very particularities; at the same time, however, they seem to fail relevant aspects of historical reality.
Arnason, Johann (1993) The Future that Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London: Routledge.
2.
Arnason, Johann (1996) `Totalitarismus and Modernisierung', in Lars Clausen (ed.) Gesellschaft im Umbruch. Frankfurt: Campus.
3.
Arendt, Hannah (1968) The Origins of Totalitarianism, 3rd edn.London: HB.
4.
Breuer, Stefan (1994) Bürokratie und Charisma: Zur politischen Soziologie Max Webers. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
5.
Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1989) The Grand Failure. The Birth and Death of Communism in the 20th Century. New York.
6.
Courtois, Stéphane (ed.) (1998) Schwarzbuch des Kommunismus. Munich: Piper.
7.
Friedrich, Carl , Curtis, Michael and Barber, Benjamin (1969) Totalitarianism in Perspective. Three Views. London.
8.
Furet, François (1996) Das Ende der Illusion. Der Kommunismus im 20. Jahrhundert. Munich.
9.
Hirszowicz, Maria (1980) The Bureaucratic Leviathan. A Study in the Sociology of Communism. New York: New York University Press.
10.
Hobsbawm, Eric J. (1994) Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914-1991. London: Michael Joseph.
11.
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor (1973) Dialectic of Enlightenment. London.
12.
Jowitt, Ken (1983) `Soviet Neotraditionalism', Soviet Studies33(3).
13.
Jowitt, Ken (1992) New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.
14.
Kielmansegg, Peter Graf (1996) `Krise der Totalitarismus-Theorie?', in Eckhard Jesse (ed.) Totalitarismus im 20. Jahrhundert. Bonn: Bundeszeutrale für politische Bildung.
15.
Kershaw, Ian and Lewin, Moshe (eds) (1997) Stalinism and Nazism. Dictatorships in Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Lefort, Claude (1986) The Political Forms of Modern Society. Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
Lewin, Moshe (1997) `Bureaucracy and the Stalinist State', in Ian Kershaw and Moshe Lewin (eds) Stalinism and Nazism. Dictatorships in Comparison. Cambridge.
18.
Linz, Juan (1975) `Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes', in Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3. Reading, MA.
19.
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
20.
Lübbe, Hermann (1995) `Totalitäre Rechtgläubigkeit, Das Heil und der Terror', in H. Lübbe (ed.) Heilserwartung und Terror: politische Religionen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Düsseldorf: Patmos.
21.
Meuschel, Sigrid (1992) Legitimation und Parteiherrschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
22.
Neumann, Sigmund (1965) Permanent Revolution. Totalitarianism in the Age of International Civil War. London.
23.
Pakulski, Jan (1986) `Bureaucracy and the Soviet System', Studies in Comparative Communism14(1), 6 ff.
24.
Rigby, Thomas (1990) The Changing Soviet System. Mono-organisational Socialism from its Origins to Gorbachev's Restructuring. Aldershot.
25.
Walicki, Andrzej (1990) ` “The Captive Mind” Revisited: Intellectuals and Communist Totalitarianism in Poland', in Ellen Frankel Paul (ed.) Totalitarianism on the Crossroads. New Brunswick.
