Patterns of family functioning in families with a depressed member from two cultures (North America and Hungary) were compared. In both cultural settings, families with a depressed member reported poorer family functioning than the control families. Comparisons between the two depressed groups, however, showed that the response to family dysfunction by the two cultures differed. While depressed families in Hungary reported difficulties in setting family rules and boundaries, those in North America experienced impaired functioning in solving problems, communicating, being involved with each other, and in overall functioning. These results are discussed in terms of the interplay between culture, depression and family functioning.
References
1.
GarfinkelP.E., GarnerD.M.The role of the family. In: Anorexia nervosa: a multidimensional perspective.New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers,1982: 164–187.
2.
SteinglassP., RobertsonA.The alcoholic family. In: KissenB., BegleiterH., eds. The biology of alcoholism, volume 6. Psychosocial factors.New York: Plenum Press,1983: 243–307.
3.
MerikangasK.R., PrusoffB.A., KupperA.J.Marital adjustment in major depression.J Affective Disord1985; 9: 5–11.
4.
KeitnerG.I., BaldwinL., EpsteinN.B.Family functioning in patients with affective disorders: a review.International Journal of Family Psychiatry1985; 6: 405–437.
5.
KeitnerG.I., MillerI.W., EpsteinN.B.The functioning of families in patients with major depression.International Journal of Family Psychiatry1986; 7: 11–15.
6.
VaughnC., LeffJ.The influence of family and social factors on the course of psychiatric illness: a comparison of schizophrenic and depressed neurotic patients.Br J Psychiatry1976; 129: 125–137.
7.
MillerI.W., KabacoffR.I., KeitnerG.I.Family functioning in the families of psychiatric patients.Compr Psychiatry1986; 27: 302–312.
8.
FabregaH.Problems implicit in the cultural and social study of depression.Psychosom Med1974; 36: 377–398.
9.
MurphyH.B.M.Differences between mental disorders of French Canadians and British Canadians.Can Psychiatr Assoc J1974; 19(3): 247–257.
10.
MezzichJ.E., RaabE.S.Depressive symptomatology across the Americas.Arch Gen Psychiatry1980; 37: 818–823.
11.
EscobarJ.I., GomezJ., TuasonV.B.Depressive phenomenology in North and South American patients.Am J Psychiatry1983; 140: 47–51.
12.
KoppM.S., SkrabskiA., MagyarI.Neurotics at risk and suicidal behavior in the Hungarian population.Acta Psychiatr Scand1987; 76: 406–413.
13.
MillerI.W., EpsteinN.B., BishopD.S.The McMaster Family Assessment Device: reliability and validity.J Mar Fam Ther1985; 11: 345–356.
14.
NockL., RossiH.Household types and social standing.Social Forces1979; 57: 1325–1345.
15.
EpsteinN.B., BishopD.S., LevinS.The McMaster Model of Family Functioning.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling1978; 4: 19–31.
16.
EpsteinN.B., BaldwinL.M., BishopD.S.The McMaster Family Assessment Device.J Mar Fam Ther1983; 9: 171–180.
17.
KeitnerG.I., MillerI.W., FruzzettiA.E.Family functioning and suicidal behavior in psychiatric inpatients with major depression.Psychiatry1987; 50: 242–255.
18.
KeitnerG.I., MillerI.W., EpsteinN.B.Family functioning and the course of major depression.Compr Psychiatry1987; 28: 54–64.
19.
CrowneD.P., MarlowD.The approval motive: studies in evaluative dependence.New York: John Wiley and Sons,1964.
20.
EysenckS.B.G., KozekiB., GellenneM.K.Cross-cultural comparison of personality: Hungarian children and English children.Personality and Individual Differences1980; 1: 347–353.
21.
HeinrichH.G.Hungary: politics, economics, and society.Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.,1986.
22.
LosoncziA.Ways of living and social change. In: HalmosP., AlbrowM., Keele, eds. Hungarian sociological studies.Staffordshire UK: University of Keele,1972: 91–121.
23.
SawyerM.G., SarrisA., BaghurstP.A.Family Assessment Device: reports from mothers, fathers, and adolescents in community and clinic families.J Mar Fam Ther1988; 14: 287–296.
