Despite the enduring use and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) over the last half century, training in the theory and administration of ECT in the United States and the United Kingdom has been substandard and erratic. This survey of senior residents across Canada reveals limitations in the ECT training received by Canadian psychiatrists and the need to set academic standards.
References
1.
WestE.D.Electric convulsion therapy in depression: a double-blind controlled trial.Br Med J1978; 1: 355–357.
2.
BrandonS., CowleyP., McDonaldC.Electroconvulsive therapy: results in depressive illness from the Leicestershire trial.Br Med J1984; 288: 22–25.
3.
JanicakP.G., DavisJ.M., GibbonsR.D.Efficacy of ECT: a meta-analysis.Am J Psychiatry1985; 142: 297–302.
4.
KroesslerD.Relative efficacy rates for therapies of delusional depression.Convulsive Therapy1985; 1: 173–182.
5.
Specialty training requirements in psychiatry.Ottawa ON: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 1987.
6.
RaskinD.E.A survey of electroconvulsive therapy: use and training in university hospitals in 1984.Convulsive Therapy1986; 2: 293–296.
7.
BolwigT.G.Training in convulsive therapy in Denmark.Convulsive Therapy1987; 3: 156–157.
8.
BenbowS.M.Effect of training on administration of electroconvulsive therapy by junior doctors.Convulsive Therapy1986; 2: 19–24.
9.
RothmanW.ECT: the historical, social, and professional sources of the controversy.Psychopharmacol Bull1986; 22: 459–463.
10.
FinkM.New technology in convulsive therapy: a challenge in training.Am J Psychiatry1987; 144: 1195–1198.
11.
MartinB.A.Electroconvulsive therapy: contemporary standards of practice.Can J Psychiatry1986; 31(8): 759–771.
12.
ECT in Britain: a shameful state of affairs (editorial).Lancet1981; ii: 1207–1208.
