This paper critically examines the code of ethics that applies to practising psychiatrists. The code performs the functions for which it was designed admirably well. It does not, however, resolve moral dilemmas (i. e., complex situations in which any course of action compromises certain ethical principles). In these cases, the psychiatrist must turn to wider moral theory (i. e., psychiatric ethics) for guidance.
References
1.
Tarasoff vs the Regions of the University of California.California Reporter1976; 131; 14.
2.
CurranW.J.Confidentiality and the prediction of dangerousness in psychiatry: the Tarasoff case.N Engl J Med1975; 293: 185–286.
3.
MellorC.The Canadian Medical Association code of ethics annotated for psychiatrists. The position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association.Can J Psychiatry1980; 25(6): 432–438.
4.
GillionR.Philosophical medical ethics.New York: John Wiley and Sons,1985.
5.
ParedesJ., BeyersteinD., BrowneA.Psychiatric ethics: the outline of à general approach. Presentated at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychiatric Association, Vancouver BC, September 1986.
6.
DyerA.D.Ethics and psychiatry: toward a professional definition.Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.,1988.
7.
GuiloffR.J.Motor neuron disease and ethics: a neurologist's point of view.J R Soc Med1980; 80: 473–474.
8.
ParedesJ., LedwidgeB., BeyersteinD.The review panel process: interpretation of the findings and recommendations.Can J Psychiatry1987; 32(6): 444–447.
9.
ParedesJ., KanachowskiA., LedwidgeB.The validity of commitment certificates in British Columbia. Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychiatric Association, Halifax NS, September 1988.
