Abstract
Twenty phobic outpatients were treated by 9 weekly “interviews” at the console of a desk computer. Using a conversational style and multiple choice questions, the computer assessed the symptoms and agreed a hierarchy of self-exposure tasks. Each week the patient was given a diary sheet of tasks to practise daily. At his next visit his progress and motivation were assessed, and if he was succeeding he was encouraged to accept progressively more difficult tasks. This group was compared with a group of 20 patients (matched for age, sex and type of phobia) treated conventionally by a therapist in the preceding year.
Progress was measured on standardized scales (both self- and clinician-rated). The two groups showed significant improvement on all the scales, and 75–80% of each group were much improved (scores reduced by 50%). The therapist treated group tended to be more severely ill at entry and to show greater improvement during treatment. Improvement was maintained at 6 month follow-up in both groups.