Abstract
Among the most contentious legal and ethical issues concerning the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are the criteria for obtaining a valid consent to treatment and its administration to involuntarily hospitalized patients, with or without consent. This paper reviews the consent process, in particular the assessment of competence, as it is affected by the symptoms and clinical circumstances, including civil status, of those patients for whom ECT is prescribed.
The ECT caseload at one psychiatric facility was reviewed to determine the diagnosis and civil status of each patient and the source of consent for each course of ECT prescribed over a 10-year period. Significant differences were found in the diagnostic distribution and the source of consent by diagnostic group between the 1,042 courses administered to informal patients and the 249 courses to involuntary patients. The results are discussed in the context of relevant Ontario legislation and hospital policies. Recommendations are made for the improvement of procedural safeguards to protect the autonomy of all patients.