Abstract
The technique of installing penile prostheses for treatment of erectile dysfunction in the male is becoming increasingly popular, particularly, but by no means exclusively in the cases of impotence in which biological factors are clearly implicated. The literature to date fails to take into account suprabiological factors such as the nature of the couple's sexual relationship and more particularly the sexual myths that shape their sexual behaviour. The author evaluated eight couples in which the male was seeking a penile prostheses and in all eight couples a variety of sexual myths had contributed to major sexual problems for the couple, even before the onset of the erectile dysfunction. A plea is made for discarding the false dichotomy or “organic” versus “functional”, in favour of a list of etiological factors including the biological ones as well as suprabiological ones. Also, the installation of penile implants should only be considered after a full investigation of the couple's sexuality by a competent sex therapist and only when other forms of couple/sex therapy have failed.
