Physicians have been criticized for abusing the civil rights of the mentally ill by their methods of committal. To see if such criticism is justified in Canada, a review was conducted of all the major legal journals to identify cases in which it was alleged that physicians had wrongfully certified a patient. These cases are outlined, and, when considered along with the scientific literature, show no justification to support allegations of abuse, but rather show that physicians act with care and concern on behalf of their patients.
References
1.
SharpeG.The Ontario mental health act, 1978: a legal perspective.Can J Psychiatry1979; 24: 517–9.
2.
AnandR.Involuntary civil commitment in Ontario: the need to curtail the abuses of psychiatry.Canadian Bar Review1979; 57: 250–80.
3.
Editorial.Difficulties in commitment of the mentally ill.Can Med Assoc J1981; 124: 663–4.
4.
Burke vs. Efstatianos, Johnson & Psychopathic Hospital.Western Weekly Reports1961; 34: 337–56.
5.
Re Robinson and Hislop. Dominion Law Reports (3d)1980; 114: 620–34.
6.
Schmidt vs. Katz and Schnider.Western Weekly Reports1954; 13: 654–6.
7.
Fawcett vs. A.-G for Ontario.Dominion Law Reports (2d)1962; 40: 942–53.
8.
Ferris vs. Arndt et al. Legal Medical Quarterly1979; 3: 50–60.
9.
Re Kosinka and Clarke Institute of Psychiatry1980; 4: 153–5.
10.
Tanner vs. Norys.Western Weekly Reports1980; 4: 33–66.
11.
Re Hoskins and Hislop.Dominion Law Reports (3d)1980; 121: 337–45.
12.
SlovenkoR.Criminal justice procedures in civil commitment.Hosp Community Psychiatry1977; 28: 817–26.
13.
GunnJ.Prisons, shelters and homeless men.Psychiatric Quarterly1974; 48: 505–12.
14.
McGarryL., BendtR.H.Criminal vs. civil commitment of psychiatric offenders.Am J Psychiatry1969; 125: 1387–94.
15.
RollinH.R.The care of the mentally abnormal offender and the protection of the public.J Med Ethics1976; 2: 157–62.
16.
Editorial.Inhumanity to man.Br Med J1977; 591–2.
17.
GunnJ.Criminal behaviour and mental disorder.Br J Psychiatry1977; 130: 317–29.
18.
BowdenP.The current management of the mentally disordered offender.Proc Roy Soc Med1977; 70: 881–4.
19.
OrrJ.H.The imprisonment of mentally disordered offenders.Br J Psychiatry1978; 133: 194–9.
20.
ClanonT.L.Public protection and the trend to determinate sentence structure.Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law1979; 7: 179–89.
21.
BonovitzJ.C., GuyE.B.Impact of restrictive civil commitment procedures on a prison psychiatric service.Am J Psychiatry1979; 136: 1045–8.
22.
StelovichS.From the hospital to the prison: a step forward in deinstitutionalization?Hosp Community Psychiatry1979; 30: 618–20.
23.
WhitmerG.E.From hospitals to jails: the fate of California's deinstitutionalized mentally ill.Am J Orthopsychiatry1980; 50: 65–75.
24.
PageS., YatesE.Civil commitment and the danger mandate.Can Psychiatr Assoc J1973; 18: 267–71.
25.
PageS., YatesE.A note on semantics and civil commitment.Can Psychiatr Assoc J1974; 19: 413–4.
26.
PageS., FirthJ.Civil commitment practices in 1977.Can J Psychiatry1979; 24: 329–35.
