Data are presented regarding the decision by medical staff and by patients to discontinue renal dialysis. Some relevant issues regarding the patients are discussed, including their mental competence, underlying motivation and psychiatric state. Also some of the medical factors involved in the decision to stop treatment are considered. Emphasis is placed on the importance of the patient's sense of active participation and involvement in his treatment. Mention is made of the importance of interventions to decrease the psychological morbidity in survivors of patients who stop dialysis.
References
1.
LewisHP. Machine medicine and its relation to the fatally ill. JAMA1968; 206: 387-88.
2.
CollinsVJ. Limit of medical responsibility in prolonging life. Guides to decisions. JAMA1968; 206: 389-92.
3.
Editorial. When do we let the patient die?Ann Intern Med1968;68:695-700.
4.
HunterRCA. Euthanasia. A paper for discussion by psychiatrists. Can J Psychiatry1980; 25: 439-45.
5.
Pope Pius XII: Acta Apostolicae Sedis1957; 49: 1031-32.
6.
Proceedings.AMA House of Delegates, December 1973.
7.
FletcherGP. Legal aspects of the decision not to prolong life. JAMA1968; 203: 65-8.
8.
McCormickRA. Editorial. The Karen Ann Quinlan case. JAMA1975: 234: 1057.
9.
ParisJJ. Court intervention and the diminution of patients’ rights: the case of Brother Joseph Fox. N Engl J Med1980; 303: 876-8.
10.
LebDF. Moral issues in end-stage renal disease. Dialysis and Transplantation1980; 9: 432-3.
11.
RodinGM. Renal dialysis and the liaison psychiatrist. Can J Psychiatry1980; 25: 473-7.
12.
RabkinMH, GilleranG, RiceNR. Orders not to resuscitate. N Engl J Med1976; 295: 364-6.
13.
JacksonDL, YoungnerS.Patient autonomy and death with dignity. Some clinical caveats. N Engl J Med1979; 301: 404-8.
14.
MurphyG.The physician's responsibility for suicide II. Errors of omission. Ann Intern Med1975; 82: 305-9.
15.
FioreN.Fighting cancer — one patient's perspective. N Engl J Med1979; 300: 284-9.
