AnandiR.: Involuntary civil commitment in Ontario: The need to curtail the abuse of psychiatry.Canadian Bar Review, LVII: 250–280, 1979.
2.
BirnbaumM.: The right to treatment.American Bar Association J, 46: 499–505, 1960.
3.
BrakelS., RockR.S.: “The Mentally Disabled and the Law.” The American Bar Foundation Study.University of Chicago Press, 1971.
4.
BrooksA.D.: Law, Psychiatry and the Mental Health System.Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1974, p. 676.
5.
BrownL.B., BremerJ.M.: Inadequate means to a noble end: The right to treatment paradox.J Psychiatry and the Law, 6(1): 46–69, 1978.
6.
ChamberlinJ.: On Our Own — Patient Controlled Alternatives to Mental Health System.New York: Hawthorn Corp., 1978.
7.
ChodoffP.: The case for involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.Am J Psychiatry, 133(5): 496–501, 1976.
8.
CurranW.J.: The Supreme Court and madness: A middle ground on proof of mental illness for commitment.N Engl J Med, 301(6): 317–318, 1979.
9.
DavidoffD.J.: The Malpractice of Psychiatrists.Springfield: Thomas, 1973.
10.
DeutschA.: The Mentally Ill in America: A History of Their Care and Treatment From Colonial Times.New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1946.
11.
ElliottW.A., TimburyG.C., WalkerM.M.: Compulsory admission to hospital: An operational review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1960.Br J Psychiatry, 135: 104–114, 1979.
12.
EmsmingerL., LiguoriT.: The therapeutic significance of the civil commitment hearing: An unexplored potential.J Psychiatry and The Law, 6(1): 5–44, 1978.
13.
EnnisB.: Prisoners of Psychiatry.N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich, 1972.
14.
GalieL.P.: An essay on the civil commitment lawyer: Or how I learned to hate the adversary system.J Psychiatry and the Law, 6(1): 71–105, 1978.
15.
GordonD., AlexanderD.A., DietzanJ.: The psychiatric patient — A voice to be heard.Br J Psychiatry, 135: 115–121, 1979.
16.
GoodmanE.: Compulsory admission of the mentally ill.Med J Aust, 1: 964–965, 1977.
17.
GoveW., FainJ.: A comparison of voluntary and committed psychiatric patients.Arch Gen Psychiatry, 34: 669–676, 1977.
18.
Government of Manitoba: “Mental Health Act” Revised Statutes of Manitoba. Chapter M110. Queens’ Printer for the Province of Manitoba, 1974.
19.
Government Of Ontario: “Mental Health Act” Revised Statutes of Ontario. 1970, Chapter 269 as amended 1978 Chapter 50 (Bill 19). Queens’ Printer for Ontario, 1978.
20.
GutheilT., ShapiroR., St. ClairR.,: Legal guardianship in drug refusal: An illusory solution.Am J Psychiatry, 137(3): 347–352, 1980.
21.
HerringtonB.S.: Supreme Court Rules on Commitment.Psychiatric News, XIV (10): 1, May 18, 1979.
22.
HoffmanP.B.: Living with your rights off.Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 5(2): 171–199, 1977.
23.
KopolowL.: Review of major implications of O'Connor vs. Donaldson decision.Am J Psychiatry, 133(4): 379–383, 1976.
24.
LinnL.: Social characteristics and patient expectations toward mental hospitalization.Arch Gen Psychiatry, 20: 457–469, 1969.
25.
McDonaldM.: South African Mental Health Care Scored.Psychatric News, XIV (10): 1, May 18, 1979.
26.
MillerA.: The Ontario Mental Health Act 1978. A comment on its application.Can J Psychiatry.24(6): 515–516, 1979.
27.
MonahanJ.: The psychiatrization of criminal behaviour: A reply.Hosp Community Psychiatry, 24: 105–108, 1973.
28.
News & Notes: Supreme Court rules against involuntary commitment of non-dangerous mentally ill.Hosp Community Psychiatry26: 616, 1975.
29.
O'Connor vs. Donaldson: (U.S.) F.2d — (5th Cir. decided April 26, 1974).
ReitsmaM.: Civil liberties and the mentally ill.Canada's Mental Health.XXI: 8–12, 1973.
39.
RappoportJ. (ed): The Clinical Evaluation of Dangerousness of the Mentally Ill.Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1967.
40.
RosenzweigS.: Compulsory hospitalization of mentally ill —Laws for psychiatric treatment.Am J Public Health, 61(1): 121–126, 1971.
41.
RothL.: “Involuntary Civil Commitment: The Right to Treatment and the Right to Refuse Treatment,” in: Psychiatrists and the Legal Process: Diagnosis and Debate. (Ed) BonnieR.J., New York: Insight Communications, 1977.
42.
RothL.H.: Judicial Action Report.Psych. News.XIV (17): 5, September 7, 1979.
43.
RothL.H.: A commitment law for patients, doctors and lawyers.Am J Psychiatry, 136(9): 1121–1127, 1979.
44.
Rouse vs. Cameron: U.S. 373 F.2d - 451 (DC Cir. 1966).
45.
RozovskyL.: Civil commitment of the mentally ill.Dimens Health Serv, 55(11): 38–39, November, 1978.
46.
SataL.S., GoldenbergE.: A study of involuntary patients in Seattle.Hosp Community Psychiatry, 28: 834–837, 1977.
47.
ShannonP.: Coercion and compulsory hospitalization: Some patients’ attitudes.Med J Aust, 2: 798–800, November 20, 1976.
48.
SharpeG.: The Ontario Mental Health Act 1978: A legal perspective.Can J Psychiatry, 24(6): 517–519, 1979.
49.
SlovenkoR.: Criminal justice procedures in civil commitment.Hosp Community Psychiatry, 28: 817–826, 1977.
50.
SpensleyJ., BarterJ., WermeP., LangsleyD.: Involuntary hospitalization: What for and how long?Am J Psychiatry, 131(2): 219–223, 1974.
51.
StoneA.: Mental Health and Law: A System in Transition. Dhew Pub. No. (ADM) 76-176, N.I.M.H., Rockville, 1975.
52.
StoneA.: Comment on: Is dangerousness an issue for physicians in emergency commitment?Am J Psychiatry, 132: 829–831, 1975.
53.
StoneA.: Overview: The right to treatment — Comments on law and its impact.Am J Psychiatry, 132(11): 1125–1134, 1975.
54.
StoneA.: Recent mental health litigation: A critical perspective.Am J Psychiatry, 134(3): 273–279, 1977.
55.
SzaszT.S.: Law, Liberty and Psychiatry.New York: MacMillan & Co., 1963.
56.
Task Force Reports: “Clinical Aspects of the Violent Individual.” American Psychiatric Association, 1974.
57.
TomelleriC.J., LakshminarayananN., HerjanicM.: Who are the committed?J Nerv Ment Dis, 165: 288–293, 1977.
58.
VincentM.: Commentary on: Civil Commitment practices in 1977.Can J Psychiarty, 24(4): 334–35, 1979.
59.
WeinsteinH.: The right to refuse treatment.Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 5(4): 425–437, 1977.
WeitzelW.: Changing law and clinical dilemma.Am J Psychiatry, 134(3): 293–295, 1977.
62.
World Psychiatric Association:Declaration of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1977.
63.
Wyatt vs. Stickney: (U.S.) 325 F. Supp. 781,785 (1971).
64.
ZwerlingI., KarasuT., PlutchickR., KellermanS: A comparison of voluntary and involuntary patients in a State Hospital.Am J Orthopsychiatry, 45(1): 81–87, 1975.
65.
ZwerlingI., ConteH,. PlutchikR., KarasuT.: No commitment week — A feasibility study.Am J Psychiatry, 135(10): 1198–1201, October, 1978.