The present study investigated the social responsiveness of the general public, and of psychiatric hospital staff, using Mil-gram's (1969) lost-letter technique. The public did not return fewer (or more) letters believed to be addressed to mental patients. Highest return rates were observed when personal costs to the finder were negligible. Psychiatric staff returned significantly fewer letters than did the general public. Other research, and implications of the findings, are outlined.
References
1.
CrocettiG., SpiroH., SiassiI.: Contemporary Attitudes toward Mental Illness.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1974.
2.
FarinaA., FelnerR., BoudreauL.: Reactions of workers to male and female mental patient job applicants.J Consult Clin Psychol, 41: 363–372, 1973.
GoveW., FainT.: The stigma of mental hospitalization.Arch Gen Psychiatry, 28: 494–500, 1973.
5.
GrazianoA., FinkR.: Second-order effects in mental health treatment.J Consult Clin Psychol, 40: 356–364, 1973.
6.
HaneyC., BanksW., ZimbardoP.: Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison.Int J Criminology and Penology, 1: 69–97, 1973.
7.
LangerE., AbelsonR.: A patient by any other name. clinician group difference in labeling bias.J Consult Clin Psychol, 42: 4–9, 1974.
8.
MilgramS.: The lost-letter technique.Psychology Today, 3: 30–33, 66–68, 1969.
9.
NunallyJ.: Popular Conceptions of Mental Health.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1961.
10.
PageS.: Effects of the mental illness label in attempts to obtain accommodation.Can J Behav Sci, 9: 85–90, 1977.
11.
RosenhanD.: On being sane in insane places, Science, 179: 250–257, 1973.
12.
SarbinT., MancusoJ.: Failure of amoral enterprise: attitudes of the public toward mental illness.J Consult clin Psychol35: 159–173, 1970.
13.
SegalS.: Attitudes toward the mentally ill.Social Work, 23: 211–220, 1978.
14.
ShotlandR., BergerW., ForsytheR.: A validation of the lost-letter technique.Public Opinion Quarterly, 34: 278–281, 1970.
15.
SimonW., GillenM.: Return rates of “lost” letters as a function of whether the letter is stamped and amount of money apparently in the letter.Psychol Rep, 29: 141–142, 1971.
16.
VailD.: Dehumanization and the Institutional Career.Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 1966.