Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
A Geospatial Analysis of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs in Toronto,Canada: Une analyse géospatiale des programmes d’intervention précoce en cas de psychose à Toronto,au Canada
Early psychosis intervention (EPI) programs play a crucial role in detecting and treating psychosis early, yet disparities in access persist. This study aimed to assess the spatial accessibility of EPI programs in Toronto, Canada, and to explore the association between access and indicators of neighbourhood-level marginalization.
Methods
We conducted a geospatial analysis using floating catchment area and two-step floating catchment area methods, examining EPI program locations, census population estimates for the 158 Toronto neighbourhoods, and area-level marginalization data. Spatial regression models were used to estimate the association between marginalization factors and spatial accessibility.
Results
On average, the closest EPI program is 4 km away from the centre of any given neighbourhood (range 0.8–11 km), with variability across the city. Clustering is observed in some neighbourhoods, indicating better spatial accessibility, whereas other neighbourhoods face lower access. A full spatial regression model showed increasing levels of housing and dwelling marginalization, as well as material resource marginalization, to be associated with better access.
Conclusion
We identified neighbourhoods that have poorer spatial accessibility to EPI services. Some neighbourhood-level marginalization indicators previously found to be associated with psychosis risk are also associated with better spatial accessibility. It is notable that EPI services in Toronto may be located where they are most needed the most. The study underscores the importance of geospatial analyses to identify and address geographic distance as a potential source of disparity in access.
McGorryPDKillackeyEYungAR. Early intervention in psychotic disorders: detection and treatment of the first episode and the critical early stages. Med J Aust. 2007;187(S7):S8‐S10. doi:https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01327.x
2.
RuggeriMBonettoCLasalviaA, et al.Feasibility and effectiveness of a multi-element psychosocial intervention for first-episode psychosis: results from the cluster-randomized controlled GET UP PIANO trial in a catchment area of 10 million inhabitants. Schizophr Bull. 2015;41(5):1192‐1203.
3.
KaneJMRobinsonDGSchoolerNR, et al.Comprehensive versus usual community care for first-episode psychosis: 2-year outcomes from the NIMH RAISE early treatment program. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;173(4):362‐372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050632
4.
PetersenLJeppesenPThorupA, et al.A randomised multicentre trial of integrated versus standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness. Br Med J.2005;331(7517):602.
5.
AndersonKKNormanRMacDougallA, et al.Effectiveness of early psychosis intervention: comparison of service users and nonusers in population-based health administrative data. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(5):443‐452.
6.
AndersonKKNormanRMacDougallAG, et al.Estimating the incidence of first-episode psychosis using population-based health administrative data to inform early psychosis intervention services. Psychol Med. 2019;49(12):2091‐2099.
7.
DoyleALanoilJDudekK. Fountain House: Creating Community in Mental Health Practice. New York, USA: Columbia University Press, 2013, 218p.
8.
RotenbergMGozdyraPAndersonKK, et al.The role of geography and distance on physician follow-up after a first hospitalization with a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0287334.
9.
GoldnerEMJonesWFangML. Access to and waiting time for psychiatrist services in a Canadian urban area: a study in real time. Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56(8):474‐480.
10.
KurdyakPStukelTAGoldbloomD, et al.Universal coverage without universal access: a study of psychiatrist supply and practice patterns in Ontario. Open Med. 2014;8(3):e87‐e99.
11.
KurdyakPZaheerJChengJ, et al.Changes in characteristics and practice patterns of Ontario psychiatrists: implications for access to psychiatrists. Can J Psychiatry. 2017;62(1):40‐47.
12.
RotenbergMTuckAAndersonKK, et al.Neighbourhood-level social capital, marginalisation, and the incidence of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in Toronto, Canada: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Psychol Med. 2023;53(6):2643‐2651.
13.
RotenbergMTuckAAndersonKK, et al.The incidence of psychotic disorders and area-level marginalization in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Can J Psychiatry. 2021;67(3):216-225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437211011852
14.
OluwoyeOPuziaMLissauA, et al.Multidimensional approach to exploring neighborhood determinants and symptom severity among individuals with psychosis. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(5):e2410269.
15.
van der VenEJonesNBareisN, et al.An intersectional approach to ethnoracial disparities in pathways to care among individuals with psychosis in coordinated specialty care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022;79(8):790‐798.
16.
NguiANApparicioP. Optimizing the two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility to medical clinics in Montreal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):166.
17.
ApparicioPGelbJDubéA-S, et al.The approaches to measuring the potential spatial access to urban health services revisited: distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int J Health Geogr. 2017;16(1):32.
18.
LuoWWangF. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ Plan B Plan Des. 2003;30(6):865‐884.
19.
WangLDorkenooS.Measuring spatial accessibility of older adults to primary care physicians and adult day programs in the Toronto CMA. Nursing and Palliative Care. 2018;3(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.15761/NPC.1000186
20.
ShahTIClarkAFSeabrookJA, et al.Geographic accessibility to primary care providers: comparing rural and urban areas in Southwestern Ontario. Can Geogr Géographies Can. 2020;64(1):65‐78.
21.
ShahTIBellSWilsonK. Spatial accessibility to health care services: identifying under-serviced neighbourhoods in Canadian urban areas. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168208.
22.
Ngamini NguiAVanasseA. Assessing spatial accessibility to mental health facilities in an urban environment. Spat Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 2012;3(3):195‐203.
23.
OluwoyeOAmiriSKordasG, et al.Geographic disparities in access to specialty care programs for early psychosis in Washington State. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022;49(1):5‐12.
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Program Policy Framework for Early Intervention in Psychosis. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, 2004.
30.
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Early psychosis intervention program standards. March 2011.
MathesonFDunnJRSmithKLW, et al.Development of the Canadian marginalization index: a new tool for the study of inequality. Can J Public Health Rev Can Santee Publique. 2012;103(8 Suppl 2):S12‐S16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403823
KozloffNFoussiasGDurbinJ, et al.Early psychosis intervention-spreading evidence-based treatment (EPI-SET): protocol for an effectiveness-implementation study of a structured model of care for psychosis in youth and emerging adults. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e034280.
40.
KuBSComptonMTWalkerEF, et al.Social fragmentation and schizophrenia: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021;83(1):38587. doi:https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21r13941
41.
KnightonAJSavitzLBelnapT, et al.Introduction of an area deprivation Index measuring patient socioeconomic status in an integrated health system. Implications for Population Health. eGEMs. 2016;4(3):1238.
42.
AddingtonDBirchwoodMJonesP, et al.Fidelity scales and performance measures to support implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12(6):1235‐1242.
DurbinJSelickALangillG, et al.Using fidelity measurement to assess quality of early psychosis intervention services in Ontario. Psychiatr Serv. 2019;70(9):840‐844.
45.
KvigEIBrinchmannBMoeC, et al.Geographical accessibility and duration of untreated psychosis: distance as a determinant of treatment delay. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):176.
46.
van IngenTMathesonFI. The 2011 and 2016 iterations of the Ontario marginalization index: updates, consistency and a cross-sectional study of health outcome associations. Can J Public Health Rev Can Sante Publique. 2022;113(2):260‐271.
47.
KirkbrideJB. Epidemiology on demand: population-based approaches to mental health service commissioning. BJPsych Bull. 2015;39(5):242.
48.
McDonaldKDingTKerH, et al.Using epidemiological evidence to forecast population need for early treatment programmes in mental health: a generalisable Bayesian prediction methodology applied to and validated for first-episode psychosis in England. Br J Psychiatry. 2021;219(1):383‐391.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
