To determine whether the items in one of the most widely validated instruments of violence risk assessment, the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), are used in review board hearings to assess the risk of violence by people found Not Criminally Responsible on account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD).
Method:
This study was conducted from October 2004 to August 2006 in Quebec's sole forensic psychiatric hospital and 2 large civil psychiatric hospitals designated for the care of people declared NCRMD in the Montreal metropolitan area. The risk assessments presented by clinicians at annual review board hearings and the boards' rationale for the release or detention of people found NCRMD were contrasted with the risk assessments conducted by the research team using the HCR-20. The final sample was comprised of 96 men.
Results:
Very few of the risk factors identified by prior research (HCR-20 items) were mentioned in the hearing process, whether in clinical reports, discussions during the hearing, or in the disposition justification.
Conclusions:
The findings confirm that there remains a significant gap between research evidence and risk assessment practice.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Health research roadmap: Creating innovative research for better health and health care: CIHR's strategic plan 2009–10 to 2013–14. Ottawa (ON): CIHR; 2009.
2.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). NIMH Strategic Plan. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
3.
Canadian Medical Association (CMA). Code of ethics of the Canadian Medical Association. Ottawa (ON): CMA; 1996.
4.
Canadian Psychological Association. Canadian code of ethics for psychologists. 3rd ed. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Psychological Association; 2000.
5.
SchneiderRD. Commentary: Evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(4):503–508.
6.
DouglasKSYeomansMBoerDP. Comparative validity analysis of multiple measures of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 2005;32(5):479–510.
7.
BloomHWebsterCHuckerSThe Canadian contribution to violence risk assessment: History and implications for current psychiatric practice. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(1):3–11.
8.
BorumR.Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training. Am Psychol. 1996;51:945–956.
9.
GlancyGDChaimowitzG.The clinical use of risk assessment. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(1):12–17.
10.
HareR.Psychopathy: A clinical and forensic overview. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006;29:709–724.
11.
HemphillJFHareRDWongS.Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Leg Crim Psychol. 1998;3:139–170.
12.
KumarSSimpsonAI. Application of risk assessment for violence methods to general adult psychiatry: A selective literature review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(5):328–335.
13.
NorkoMABaranoskiMV. The state of contemporary risk assessment research. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(1):18–26.
14.
WebsterCDDouglasKSEavesDHCR-20: Assessing risk for violence: Version 2. Burnaby (BC): Simon Fraser University; 1997.
15.
HareRD. Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (PCL-R). 2nd ed. Technical manual. Toronto (ON): Multi-Health Systems Inc; 2003.
16.
QuinseyVLHarrisGTRiceMEViolent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2006.
17.
WebsterCDMartinM-LBrinkJShort-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). Hamilton (ON): St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton; 2004.
18.
DouglasKSOgloffJRPHartSD. Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54(10):1372–1379.
19.
MonahanJ.Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of the clinical techniques. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1981.
20.
ElbogenEBMercadoCCScaloraMJPerceived relevance of factors for violence risk assessment: A survey of clinicians. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2002;1(1):37–47.
21.
HiltonNZSimmonsJL. The influence of actuarial risk assessment in clinical judgments and tribunal decisions about mentally disordered offenders in maximum security. Law Hum Behav. 2001;25(4):393–408.
22.
McKeeSAHarrisGTRiceME. Improving forensic tribunal decisions: The role of the clinician. Behav Sci Law. 2007;25:485–506.
23.
ElbogenEBTomkinsAJPothulooriAPDocumentation of violence risk information in psychiatric hospital patient charts: An empirical examination. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31:58–64.
24.
GagnonNCNichollsTOgloffJR, editors. Variables predicting structured and unstructured risk assessment ratings of violence. Poster presented at the Seventh Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services; 2007; Montreal (QC).
25.
HartSDCoxDNHareRD. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL-SV). Toronto (ON): Multi-Health Systems Inc; 1995.
26.
BoccacciniMTTurnerDBMurrieDC. Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower PCL-R scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2008;14(4):262–283.
27.
MurrieDCBoccacciniMTJohnsonJTDoes interrater (dis) agreement on psychopathy checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations?Law Hum Behav. 2008;32(4):352–362.
28.
MurrieDCBoccacciniMTTurnerDBRater (dis) agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?Psychol Public Policy Law. 2009;15(1):19–53.
29.
Minister of Justice. Criminal Code. R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46. Available from: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-46.pdf. Act current to 2012 Feb 20 and last amended 2012 Jan 1.
30.
CrockerACôtéG.Evolving systems of care: Individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in custody of civil and forensic psychiatric services. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24:356–364.
31.
CrockerAGBraithwaiteECôtéGTo detain or to release? Correlates of dispositions for individuals declared not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56(5):293–302.
32.
BelfrageHFranssonGStrandS.Prediction of violence using the HCR-20: A prospective study in two maximum-security correctional institutions. J Forens Psychiatry. 2000;11(1):167–175.
33.
de VogelVde RuiterC.Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychol Crime Law. 2006;12(3):321–336.
34.
DernevikMGrannMJohanssonS.Violent behaviour in forensic psychiatric patients: Risk assessment and different risk-management levels using the HCR-20. Psychol Crime Law. 2002;8(1):93–111.
35.
DolanMKhawajaA.The HCR-20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK. Aggress Behav. 2004;30(6):469–483.
36.
DouglasKSOgloffJRNichollsTLAssessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67(6):917–930.
37.
DouglasKSWebsterCD. The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 1999;26:3–19.
38.
GrayNSHillCMcGleishAPrediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: A prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(3):443–451.
39.
GrayNSTaylorJSnowdenRJPredicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(5):384–387.
40.
RossDJHartSDWebsterCD. Aggression in psychiatric patients using the HCR-20 to assess risk for violence in hospital and in the community. Port Coquitlam (BC): Riverview Hospital Impulsivity Project; 1998.
41.
StrandSBelfrageHFranssonGClinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders—more important than historical data ?Leg Crim Psychol. 1999;4:67–76.
42.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
43.
CrockerAGNichollsTLSetoMC. The National Trajectory Study: Examining the changing face of the forensic mental health population and services in Canada. Symposium presented at the 10th Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services; 2010 May 25–27; Vancouver (BC).
44.
SetoMC. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychol Assess. 2005;17:156–167.
