To investigate the relation of responses to the Schwartz Value Scale to preferred social distance to a person with either schizophrenia or depression. The influence of personal value priorities on discrimination has been investigated in several contexts, but seldom with reference to social distance towards those with mental illness.
Method:
University students (n = 200) completed the Schwartz Value Scale, as well as a measure of beliefs about mental illness and preferred social distance with reference to a vignette describing a person with either schizophrenia or depression.
Results:
Consistent with past findings, respondents indicated a preference for greater social distance for schizophrenia than depression, and beliefs about likelihood of socially inappropriate behaviour and danger were correlated with social distance. Self-transcendence value orientation was a significant independent predictor of preference for less social distance. These findings were not influenced by a social desirability bias.
Conclusions:
Value orientation makes a significant contribution to the prediction of social distance towards those with mental illness. Evaluation of value-based interventions to reduce such discrimination appears warranted.
CorriganPWKleinleinP.The impact of mental illness stigma. In: CorriganPW, editor. On the stigma of mental illness: Practical strategies for research and social change. Washington (DC): American Psychological Press; 2005. p 11–44.
2.
ThornicroftG.Shunned: Discrimination against people with mental illness. Oxford (GB): Oxford University Press; 2006.
3.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD); 1999.
4.
CorriganPMarkowitzFEWatsonA, An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. J Health Soc Behav. 2003;44(2):162–179.
AngermeyerMCMatschingerH.The stereotype of schizophrenia and its impact on discrimination against people with schizophrenia: Results of a representative survey in Germany. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30:1049–1061.
7.
LinkBGPhelanJC. Conceptualizing stigma. Ann Rev Sociol. 2001;27:363–385.
8.
GaebelWBaumannAE. Interventions to reduce the stigma associated with severe mental illness: Experiences from the open the doors program in Germany. Can J Psychiatry. 2003;48(10):657–662.
9.
PaykelESHartDPriestRG. Changes in public attitudes to depression during the Defeat Depression Campaign. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;173:519–522.
10.
PinfoldVHuxleyPThornicroftG, Reducing psychiatric stigma and discrimination—evaluating an educational intervention with the police force in England. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003;38(6):337–344.
11.
PinfoldVToulminHThornicroftG, Reducing psychiatric stigma and discrimination: Evaluation of educational interventions in UK secondary schools. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;182:342–346.
12.
RosenAWalterGCaseyD, Combating psychiatric stigma: An overview of contemporary initiatives. Aust Psychiatry. 2000;8:19–26.
13.
SchulzeBRichter-WerlingMMatschingerH, Crazy? So what! Effects of a school project on students' attitudes towards people with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107(2):142–150.
14.
SchwartzSH. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: ZannaM, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. vol 25. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1992. p 1–65.
15.
KluckhohnC.Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In: ParsonTShilsE, editors. Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge (GB): Harvard University Press; 1951:388–433.
16.
RokeachM.The nature of human values. New York (NY): Free Press; 1973.
17.
BiernatMVescioTKThenoSA, Values and prejudice: Toward understanding the impact of American values on outgroup attitudes. In: SeligmanCOlsonJMZannaMP, editors. The psychology of human values: The Ontario symposium. vol 8. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996.
18.
HaddockGZannaMPEssesVM. Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:1105–1118.
19.
PrattoFSidaniusJStallworthLM, Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;67:741–763.
20.
SchwartzSH. Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In: SeligmanCOlsonJMZannaMP, editors. The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium. vol 8. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1996. p 1–24.
21.
GriffithsKMNakaneYChristensenH, Stigma in response to mental disorders: A comparison of Australia and Japan. BMC Psychiatry. 2006;6:21.
22.
YangLHKleinmanALinkBG, Culture and stigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(7):1524–1535.
23.
MaagG.Zur erfassung von werten in der umfrageforschung: Ein empirischer beitrag zur neu konzeptionalisierung und operationalisierung [The assessment of value orientations in survey research: An empirical contribution to its conceptualization and operationalization]. Z Soziol. 1989;18:313–323. German.
24.
AngermeyerMCMatschingerH.Social distance towards the mentally ill: Results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychol Med. 1997;27(1):131–141.
25.
SchomerusGMatschingerHAngermeyerMC. Preferences of the public regarding cutbacks in expenditure for patient care: Are there indications of discrimination against those with mental disorders?Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(5):369–377.
26.
BardiASchwartzSH. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29(10):1207–1220.
27.
SchwartzSH. Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In: TamayoAPortoJB, editors. Valores e compertamento nas organizacoes. Petropolis (BR): Vozes; 2005. p 21–25. Spanish.
28.
SchwartzSH. Basic human values and theory: Measurement and applications. Rev Fr Soc. 2006;47:929–968.
29.
KurzbanRLearyMR. Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(2):187–208.
30.
SchwartzSHBardiA.Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2001;32:268–290.
31.
SchwartzSHBilskyW.Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58:878–891.
32.
SchmittMJSchwartzSHSteyerR, Measurement models for the Schwartz Values Inventory. Eur J Psychol Assess. 1993;9:107–121.
33.
RoccasS.Identification and status revisited: The moderating role of self-enhancement and self-transcendence values. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29(6):726–736.
34.
StruchNSchwartzSHvan der KlootWA. Meanings of basic values for women and men: A cross-cultural analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28:16–28.
35.
AngermeyerMCMatschingerH.Public beliefs about schizophrenia and depression: Similarities and differences. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epid. 2003;38(9):526–534.
36.
AngermeyerMCMatschingerH.Causal beliefs and attitudes to people with schizophrenia. Trend analysis based on data from two population surveys in Germany. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186:331–334.
37.
BogardusES. Social distance and its origins. J Appl Sociol. 1925;9:216–226.
38.
ArmitageCJConnerM.Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40(Pt 4):471–499.
39.
HaywardPBrightJA. Stigma and mental illness: A review and critique. J Ment Health. 1997;6(4):345–354.
40.
BatsonCDLishnerDACookJ, Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;27:15–25.
41.
BatsonCDSagerKGarstE, Is empathy due to self-other merging?J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73:495–509.
42.
AlexanderLALinkBG. The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. J Ment Health. 2003;12:271–289.
43.
HaghighatR.A unitary theory of stigmatisation: Pursuit of self-interest and routes to destigmatisation. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:207–215.
44.
HaghighatR.The development of an instrument to measure stigmatization: Factor analysis and origin of stigmatization. Eur J Psychiatry. 2005;19:144–154.
45.
CrowneDPMarloweD.A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960;24:349–354.
46.
TabachnickBGFidellLS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
47.
MartinJPescosolidoBATuckSA. Of fear and loathing: The role of disturbing behavior, labels, and causal attributions in shaping public attitudes toward people with mental illness. J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41:208–223.
48.
van 't VeerJTKraanHFDrosseartSHC, Determinants that shape public attitudes towards the mentally ill: A Dutch public study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41:310–317.
49.
CrispAHGelderMGRixS, Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:4–7.
50.
PescosolidoBAMonahanJLinkBG, The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1339–1345.
51.
DuttonDG. Tokenism, reverse discrimination, and egalitarianism in interracial behavior. J Soc Issues. 1976;32:93–107.
52.
FeldmanS.Economic self-interest and mass belief systems. Am J Pol Sci. 1983;26:446–466.
53.
GaertnerSLDovidioJF. The aversive form of racism. In: DovidioJFGaertnerSL, editors. Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1986.
54.
KatzIHassRG. Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55:893–905.
55.
BenDJ. Beliefs, attitudes and human affairs. Belmont (CA): Brook Cole; 1970.
56.
OlsonJMStoneJ.The influence of behavior on attitudes. In: AlbarracinDJohnsonBTZannaMP, editors. The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2005. p 223–271.
57.
CoutureSMPennDL. Interpersonal contact and the stigma of mental illness: A review of the literature. J Ment Health. 2003;12(3):291–305.
58.
KatzD.The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opin Q. 1960;24:163–204.
59.
SmithMBBrunerJSWhiteRW, editors. Opinions and personality. New York (NY): Wiley; 1956.
60.
OstromTMBrockTC. Cognitive bonding to central values and resistance to a communication advocating change in policy orientation. J Exp Res Pers. 1969;4:42–50.
61.
MurraySLHaddockGZannaMP. On creating value-expressive attitudes: An experimental approach. In: SeligmanCOlsonJMZannaM, editors. The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium. vol 8. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996.
62.
Ball-RokeachSJRokeachMGrubeJW, editors. The great American values test. New York (NY): Free Press; 1984.
63.
GreensteinT.Behavior change through value self-confrontation: A field experiment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34(2):254–262.
64.
GrubeJWMaytonDMBall-RokeachSJ. Inducing changes in values, attitudes, and behaviors: Belief system theory and the method of value self-confrontation. J Soc Issues. 1994;50:153–173.
65.
RokeachM.Long-range experimental modification of values, attitudes and behavior. Am Psychol. 1971;26:453–459.
66.
RokeachMMcLellanDD. Feedback on information about the values of self and others as determinants of long-term cognitive and behavioral change. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1972;2:236–251.
67.
SchwartzSHInbar-SabanN.Value self-confrontation as a method to aid in weight loss. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(3):396–404.
68.
MayvilleEPennDL. Changing societal attitudes toward persons with severe mental illness. Cogn Behav Pract. 1998;5:241–253.
