Surrogate decision makers, usually family and friends, are often called on to assist seniors who are incapable of making certain decisions. The literature to date has focused primarily on decisions regarding medical treatment. Less has been written about issues faced by surrogates when making other types of decisions that often arise in the practice of geriatric psychiatry. This article outlines a case relating to personal care decision-making. The discussion focuses on areas that need to be addressed to understand and assist surrogates in making personal care decisions in the future.
The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. When others must choose: Deciding for patients without capacity. Albany (NY): Health Research Inc; 1992. Guidance for surrogate decisions; p 103–15.
2.
ShidlerS.Participation of chronically ill older adults in their life-prolonging treatment decisions: Rights and opportunity. Can J Aging1998;1:1–23.
3.
MitchellSLBerkowitzRELawsonFMELipsitzLA. A cross-national survey of tube-feeding decisions in cognitively impaired older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc2000;48:391–7.
4.
MezeyMKlugerMMaislinGMittlemanM.Life-sustaining treatment decisions by spouses of patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc1996;44:144–50.
5.
BoppJColesonRE. A critique of family members as proxy decisionmakers without legal limits. Issues Law Med1996;12:133–65.
6.
KochT.Principles and purpose: The patient surrogate's perspective and role. Camb Q Health Ethics1997;6:461–9.
7.
American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias of late lifeAm J Psychiatry1997;154(Suppl 5).
8.
PenrodJDellasegaC.Caregivers' experiences in making placement decisions. West J Nurs Res1998;20:706–32.
9.
GauglerJEPearlinLILeitschSADaveyA.Relinquishing in-home dementia care: Difficulties and perceived helpfulness during the nursing home transition. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias2001;16:32–42.
10.
LevineDZuckermanC.The trouble with families: Toward an ethic of accommodation. Ann Intern Med1999;130:148–52.
11.
BaergenR.Surrogates and uncertainty. J Clin Ethics1995;6:372–7.
12.
AlbertSMDel Castillo-CastanedaSanoMJacobsDMMarderKBellK, and others. Quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's diseases as reported by patient proxies. J Am Geriatr Soc1996;44:1342–7.
13.
SmuckerWDHoutsRMDanksJHDittoPHFagerlinACoppolaM.Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do. Med Decis Making2000;20:271–80.
14.
LewisMHepburnKCorcoran-PerrySNarayanSLallyR.Options, outcomes, values, likelihoods decision-making guide for patients and their families. J Gerontol Nurs1999;25(12):19–25.
15.
KitwoodT.Toward a theory of dementia care: Ethics and interaction. J Clin Ethics1998;9:23–34.
16.
SabatSR. Voices of Alzheimer's disease sufferers: A call for treatment based on personhood. J Clin Ethics1998;9:35–48.
17.
LymanKA. Living with Alzheimer's disease: The creation of meaning among persons with dementia. J Clin Ethics1998;9:49–57.
