Aggregate demand/aggregate supply models have recently been criticized as being inappropriate and/or incorrect for explaining macroeconomic theory to students. In this article we suggest that a properly defined aggregate demand/aggregate supply approach may be quite useful in comparing and contrasting the various theoretical explanations of the macroeconomy.
→ ColanderDavid. “The Stories We Tell: A Reconsideration of AS/AD Analysis.”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Summer 1995), pp. 169–188.
3.
DavidsonPaul. “Would Keynes Be a New Keynesian?”Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 18, No, 4 (Fall 1992), pp. 449–63.
4.
GeithmanDavidT.“A Note on Teaching the Aggregate-Supply/Aggregate-Demand Model.”Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Fall 1994) pp. 475–477.
5.
→ GerrardBill. “Keynes, the Keynesians, and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation.”The Economic Journal, Vol. 105 (March 1995), pp. 445–458.
6.
KeynesJ.M.The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1936.
7.
ManikiwN. Gregory. “Symposium on Keynesian Economics Today.”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Winter 1993), pp. 5–22.
8.
MeltzerAllanH.“Information, Sticky Prices, and Macroeconomic Foundations.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. LouisReview, Vol. 77, No. 3 (May/June 1995), pp. 101–118.
9.
WrightRandall. “Commentary.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. LouisReview, Vol. 77, No. 3 (May/June 1995), pp. 119–125.
